Literature DB >> 30475706

Closed Loop Spatial and Temporal Control of Cavitation Activity with Passive Acoustic Mapping.

Arpit Patel, Scott J Schoen, Costas D Arvanitis.   

Abstract

Ultrasonically actuated microbubble oscillations hold great promise for minimally invasive therapeutic interventions. While several preclinical studies have demonstrated the potential of this technology, real-time methods to control the amplitude and type of microbubble oscillations (stable vs inertial acoustic cavitation) and ensure that cavitation occurs within the targeted region are needed for their successful translation to the clinic. In this paper, we propose a real-time nonlinear state controller that uses specific frequency bands of the microbubble acoustic emissions (harmonic, ultra-harmonic, etc.) to control cavitation activity (observer states). To attain both spatial and temporal control of cavitation activity with high signal to noise ratio, we implement a controller using fast frequency-selective passive acoustic mapping (PAM) based on the angular spectrum approach. The controller includes safety states based on the recorded broadband signal level and is able to reduce sensing inaccuracies with the inclusion of multiple frequency bands. In its simplest implementation the controller uses the peak intensity of the passive acoustic maps, reconstructed using the 3rd harmonic (4.896 × 0.019 MHz) of the excitation frequency. Our results show that the proposed real-time nonlinear state controller based on PAM is able to reach the targeted level of observer state (harmonic emissions) in less than 6 seconds and remain within 10 % of tolerance for the duration of the experiment (45 seconds). Similar response was observed using the acoustic emissions from single element passive cavitation detection, albeit with higher susceptibility to background noise and lack of spatial information. Importantly, the proposed PAM-based controller was able to control cavitation activity with spatial selectivity when cavitation existed simultaneously in multiple regions. The robustness of the controller is demonstrated using a range of controller parameters, multiple observer states concurrently (harmonic, ultra-harmonic, and broadband), noise levels (°6 to 12 dB SNR), and bubble concentrations (0.3 to 180 × 103 bubbles per microliter). More research in this direction under preclinical and clinical conditions is warranted.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30475706      PMCID: PMC6690816          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2018.2882337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  46 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery.

Authors:  Katherine Ferrara; Rachel Pollard; Mark Borden
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.590

2.  Suppressing chaotic oscillations of a spherical cavitation bubble through applying a periodic perturbation.

Authors:  Sohrab Behnia; Amin Jafari Sojahrood; Wiria Soltanpoor; Okhtay Jahanbakhsh
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 7.491

3.  Integrated ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for simultaneous temperature and cavitation monitoring during focused ultrasound therapies.

Authors:  Costas D Arvanitis; Nathan McDannold
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Shaken and stirred: mechanisms of ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Matthew J Gruber; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Intracranial inertial cavitation threshold and thermal ablation lesion creation using MRI-guided 220-kHz focused ultrasound surgery: preclinical investigation.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Xu; Carissa Carlson; John Snell; Matt Eames; Arik Hananel; M Beatriz Lopes; Prashant Raghavan; Cheng-Chia Lee; Chun-Po Yen; David Schlesinger; Neal F Kassell; Jean-Francois Aubry; Jason Sheehan
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Spatiotemporally controlled single cell sonoporation.

Authors:  Zhenzhen Fan; Haiyan Liu; Michael Mayer; Cheri X Deng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Opening the Blood-Brain Barrier with MR Imaging-guided Focused Ultrasound: Preclinical Testing on a Trans-Human Skull Porcine Model.

Authors:  Yuexi Huang; Ryan Alkins; Michael L Schwartz; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Mechanogenetics for the remote and noninvasive control of cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Yijia Pan; Sangpil Yoon; Jie Sun; Ziliang Huang; Changyang Lee; Molly Allen; Yiqian Wu; Ya-Ju Chang; Michel Sadelain; K Kirk Shung; Shu Chien; Yingxiao Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Characterization of different bubble formulations for blood-brain barrier opening using a focused ultrasound system with acoustic feedback control.

Authors:  Chenchen Bing; Yu Hong; Christopher Hernandez; Megan Rich; Bingbing Cheng; Imalka Munaweera; Debra Szczepanski; Yin Xi; Mark Bolding; Agata Exner; Rajiv Chopra
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Three-dimensional transcranial microbubble imaging for guiding volumetric ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier opening.

Authors:  Ryan M Jones; Lulu Deng; Kogee Leung; Dallan McMahon; Meaghan A O'Reilly; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 11.556

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Towards controlled drug delivery in brain tumors with microbubble-enhanced focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Scott Schoen; M Sait Kilinc; Hohyun Lee; Yutong Guo; F Levent Degertekin; Graeme F Woodworth; Costas Arvanitis
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  A Clinical System for Non-invasive Blood-Brain Barrier Opening Using a Neuronavigation-Guided Single-Element Focused Ultrasound Transducer.

Authors:  Antonios N Pouliopoulos; Shih-Ying Wu; Mark T Burgess; Maria Eleni Karakatsani; Hermes A S Kamimura; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Real-Time Passive Acoustic Mapping Using Sparse Matrix Multiplication.

Authors:  Hermes A S Kamimura; Shih-Ying Wu; Julien Grondin; Robin Ji; Christian Aurup; Wenlan Zheng; Marc Heidmann; Antonios N Pouliopoulos; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Localized blood-brain barrier opening in infiltrating gliomas with MRI-guided acoustic emissions-controlled focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Pavlos Anastasiadis; Dheeraj Gandhi; Yutong Guo; Abdul-Kareem Ahmed; Soren M Bentzen; Costas Arvanitis; Graeme F Woodworth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Single-cell analysis reveals effective siRNA delivery in brain tumors with microbubble-enhanced ultrasound and cationic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Yutong Guo; Hohyun Lee; Zhou Fang; Anastasia Velalopoulou; Jinhwan Kim; Midhun Ben Thomas; Jingbo Liu; Ryan G Abramowitz; YongTae Kim; Ahmet F Coskun; Daniel Pomeranz Krummel; Soma Sengupta; Tobey J MacDonald; Costas Arvanitis
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  Improving temporal stability of stable cavitation activity of circulating microbubbles using a closed-loop controller based on pulse-length regulation.

Authors:  Chunjie Tan; Bo Yan; Tao Han; Alfred C H Yu; Peng Qin
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 7.491

Review 7.  Advances in Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Adult Glioblastoma: Overcoming Chemical and Physical Barriers.

Authors:  Mirna Lechpammer; Rohan Rao; Sanjit Shah; Mona Mirheydari; Debanjan Bhattacharya; Abigail Koehler; Donatien Kamdem Toukam; Kevin J Haworth; Daniel Pomeranz Krummel; Soma Sengupta
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  SonoVue® vs. Sonazoid™ vs. Optison™: Which Bubble Is Best for Low-Intensity Sonoporation of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma?

Authors:  Spiros Kotopoulis; Mihaela Popa; Mireia Mayoral Safont; Elisa Murvold; Ragnhild Haugse; Anika Langer; Georg Dimcevski; Christina Lam; Tormod Bjånes; Odd Helge Gilja; Emmet Mc Cormack
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 6.321

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.