Literature DB >> 30475367

Increasing the functionalities of 3D printed microchemical devices by single material, multimaterial, and print-pause-print 3D printing.

Feng Li1, Niall P Macdonald2, Rosanne M Guijt3, Michael C Breadmore1.   

Abstract

3D printing has emerged as a valuable approach for the fabrication of fluidic devices and may replace soft-lithography as the method of choice for rapid prototyping. The potential of this disruptive technology is much greater than this - it allows for functional integration in a single, highly automated manufacturing step in a cost and time effective manner. Integration of functionality with a 3D printer can be done through spatial configuration of a single material, inserting pre-made components mid-print in a print-pause-print approach, and/or through the precise spatial deposition of different materials with a multimaterial printer. This review provides an overview on the ways in which 3D printing has been exploited to create and use fluidic devices with different functionality, which provides a basis for critical reflection on the current deficiencies and future opportunities for integration by 3D printing.

Year:  2018        PMID: 30475367     DOI: 10.1039/c8lc00826d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Chip        ISSN: 1473-0189            Impact factor:   6.799


  20 in total

1.  Adhesive bonding strategies to fabricate high-strength and transparent 3D printed microfluidic device.

Authors:  Seren Kecili; H Cumhur Tekin
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Development of a Custom-Made 3D Printing Protocol with Commercial Resins for Manufacturing Microfluidic Devices.

Authors:  Francesc Subirada; Roberto Paoli; Jessica Sierra-Agudelo; Anna Lagunas; Romen Rodriguez-Trujillo; Josep Samitier
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.967

3.  A miniaturized 3D printed pressure regulator (µPR) for microfluidic cell culture applications.

Authors:  Meng-Chun Hsu; Mehran Mansouri; Nuzhet N N Ahamed; Stephen M Larson; Indranil M Joshi; Adeel Ahmed; David A Borkholder; Vinay V Abhyankar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Direct embedding and versatile placement of electrodes in 3D printed microfluidic-devices.

Authors:  Andre D Castiaux; Emily R Currens; R Scott Martin
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 4.616

5.  Automated calibration of 3D-printed microfluidic devices based on computer vision.

Authors:  Junchao Wang; Kaicong Liang; Naiyin Zhang; Hailong Yao; Tsung-Yi Ho; Lingling Sun
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 6.  Low-cost and open-source strategies for chemical separations.

Authors:  Joshua J Davis; Samuel W Foster; James P Grinias
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 4.759

Review 7.  It's in the Fine Print: Erasable Three-Dimensional Laser-Printed Micro- and Nanostructures.

Authors:  David Gräfe; Sarah L Walden; James Blinco; Martin Wegener; Eva Blasco; Christopher Barner-Kowollik
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 15.336

8.  Three-dimensional-printing for microfluidics or the other way around?

Authors:  Yi Zhang
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2019-07-03

Review 9.  Polymer 3D Printing Review: Materials, Process, and Design Strategies for Medical Applications.

Authors:  Amit M E Arefin; Nava Raj Khatri; Nitin Kulkarni; Paul F Egan
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.329

10.  A New Direction in Microfluidics: Printed Porous Materials.

Authors:  Hanno Evard; Hans Priks; Indrek Saar; Heili Aavola; Tarmo Tamm; Ivo Leito
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.