Literature DB >> 30474264

Associated tympanic bullar and cochlear hypertrophy define adaptations to true deserts in African gerbils and laminate-toothed rats (Muridae: Gerbillinae and Murinae).

Aluwani Nengovhela1,2, José Braga1,3, Christiane Denys4, Frikkie de Beer5, Christophe Tenailleau6, Peter J Taylor2,7,8.   

Abstract

Hearing capabilities in desert rodents such as gerbils and heteromyids have been inferred from both anatomical and ecological aspects and tested with experiments and theoretical models. However, very few studies have focused on other desert-adapted species. In this study, a refined three-dimensional morphometric approach was used on three African rodent tribes (Otomyini, Taterillini and Gerbillini) to describe the cochlear and tympanic bullar morphology, and to explore the role of phylogeny, allometry and ecology to better understand the underlying mechanism of any observed trends of hypertrophy in the bulla and associated changes in the cochlea. As a result, desert-adapted species could be distinguished from mesic and semi-arid taxa by the gross cochlear dimensions, particularly the oval window, which is larger in desert species. Bullar and cochlear modifications between species could be explained by environment (bulla and oval window), phylogeny (cochlear curvature gradient) and/or allometry (cochlear relative length, oval window and bulla) with some exceptions. Based on their ear anatomy, we predict that Desmodillus auricularis and Parotomys brantsii should be sensitive to low-frequency sounds, with D. auricularis sensitive to high-frequency sounds, too. This study concludes that in both arid and semi-arid adapted laminate-toothed rats and gerbils there is bulla and associated cochlea hypertrophy, particularly in true desert species. Gerbils also show tightly coiled cochlea but the significance of this is debatable and may have nothing to do with adaptations to any specific acoustics in the desert environment.
© 2018 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT scans; Muridae; adaptation; cochlea; hearing capabilities; semi-landmarks; three-dimensional morphometrics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30474264      PMCID: PMC6326829          DOI: 10.1111/joa.12906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  37 in total

1.  Auditory systems of Heteromyidae: functional morphology and evolution of the middle ear.

Authors:  D B Webster; M Webster
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 1.804

2.  A new partial temporal bone of a juvenile hominin from the site of Kromdraai B (South Africa).

Authors:  José Braga; John Francis Thackeray; Jean Dumoncel; Didier Descouens; Laurent Bruxelles; Jean-Michel Loubes; Jean-Luc Kahn; Marco Stampanoni; Lunga Bam; Jakobus Hoffman; Frikkie de Beer; Fred Spoor
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.895

3.  Structure and function of the mammalian middle ear. I: Large middle ears in small desert mammals.

Authors:  Matthew J Mason
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Anatomical evidence for low frequency sensitivity in an archaeocete whale: comparison of the inner ear of Zygorhiza kochii with that of crown Mysticeti.

Authors:  Eric G Ekdale; Rachel A Racicot
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Glen Stecher; Koichiro Tamura
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Audiograms of five species of rodents: implications for the evolution of hearing and the perception of pitch.

Authors:  R S Heffner; G Koay; H E Heffner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Low-frequency auditory characteristics: Species dependence.

Authors:  P Dallos
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The relationship of the spiral turns of the cochlea and the length of the basilar membrane to the range of audible frequencies in ground dwelling mammals.

Authors:  C D West
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Functional morphology of the ear in fossorial rodents, Microtus arvalis and Arvicola terrestris.

Authors:  Simone Lange; Julia Stalleicken; Hynek Burda
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.804

Review 10.  Comparative review of the human bony labyrinth.

Authors:  F Spoor; F Zonneveld
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.