Literature DB >> 1142444

Auditory systems of Heteromyidae: functional morphology and evolution of the middle ear.

D B Webster, M Webster.   

Abstract

Middle ears (515) from 26 species of the rodent family Heteromyidae - genera Dipodomys, Microdipodops, Perognathus, and Liomys - were studied both grossly and histologically, for qualitative and quantitative comparisons. Middle ear modifications characteristic of each genus are qualitatively described. Quantitative comparisons are made among the 26 species in the study. Some correlations between middle ear size and other measurements are discussed. The middle ear is an acoustical transformer that for best efficiency must match the impedance of the cochlea to the impedance of the air in the external auditory meatus. It accomplishes this by a pressure increase and a velocity decrease through the combined effects of the lever and areal ratios; however, because the important consideration is a matching of two impedances rather than an absolute pressure increase, the pressure transformer ratio is a less informative measure of the middle ear's efficiency than is the impedance transform ratio. The impedance transformer mechanism is explained (from a morphological point of view), and equations are presented. Dipodomys, Microdipodops, and Perognathus have a theoretical transmission (at the resonant frequency) of 94-100% of the incident acoustical energy; Liomys, 78-80%. The areal ratio of stapes footplate to 2/3 tympanic membrane is remarkably constant among the species, varying only from 0.04 to 0.07: in Dipodomys and Microdipodops this small ratio is due to the very large tympanic membrane; in Perognathus and Liomys it is due to the extremely small stapes footplate. The lever ratio of incus to malleus varies from 0.28 to 0.33 in Dipodpmys and Microdipodops, from 0.37 to 0.46 in Perognathus, and from 0.55 to 0.60 in Liomys. In addition, the middle ear volumes and the morphology of tympanic membrane, ossicles, ligaments, and muscles, all combine to minimize both mass and stiffness. All these data suggest middle ear mechanisms which are very efficient over a broad frequency range. The middle ear modifications found in heteromyids are adaptive in predator avoidance, especially in areas of little natural cover; nevertheless, contrary to expectations, there is no firm relationship between habitat and the extent of these modifications in the 26 species. However, environment did apparently plan an important role in the evolution of the family, and this is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1142444     DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1051460304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Morphol        ISSN: 0022-2887            Impact factor:   1.804


  9 in total

1.  Structures that contribute to middle-ear admittance in chinchilla.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Michael E Ravicz; Jocelyn E Songer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Structure and function of the mammalian middle ear. I: Large middle ears in small desert mammals.

Authors:  Matthew J Mason
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  Structure and function of the mammalian middle ear. II: Inferring function from structure.

Authors:  Matthew J Mason
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Associated tympanic bullar and cochlear hypertrophy define adaptations to true deserts in African gerbils and laminate-toothed rats (Muridae: Gerbillinae and Murinae).

Authors:  Aluwani Nengovhela; José Braga; Christiane Denys; Frikkie de Beer; Christophe Tenailleau; Peter J Taylor
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-11-25       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Low-frequency distortion product otoacoustic emissions in two species of kangaroo rats: implications for auditory sensitivity.

Authors:  L A Shaffer; G R Long
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Ear Structures of the Naked Mole-Rat, Heterocephalus glaber, and Its Relatives (Rodentia: Bathyergidae).

Authors:  Matthew J Mason; Hannah L Cornwall; Ewan St J Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cranial variation in allactagine jerboas (Allactaginae, Dipodidae, Rodentia): a geometric morphometric study.

Authors:  Bader H Alhajeri
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2021-03-18

8.  Functional anatomy of the middle and inner ears of the red fox, in comparison to domestic dogs and cats.

Authors:  Erich Pascal Malkemper; Matthew J Mason; Hynek Burda
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Evolution of the middle ear apparatus in Talpid moles.

Authors:  Matthew J Mason
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.804

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.