Literature DB >> 30474259

Six-Month Assessment of a Hand Prosthesis with Intraneural Tactile Feedback.

Francesco M Petrini1, Giacomo Valle1,2, Ivo Strauss1,2, Giuseppe Granata3,4, Riccardo Di Iorio3,4, Edoardo D'Anna1, Paul Čvančara5, Matthias Mueller5, Jacopo Carpaneto2, Francesco Clemente2, Marco Controzzi2, Lorenzo Bisoni6, Caterina Carboni6, Massimo Barbaro6, Francesco Iodice3,4, David Andreu7, Arthur Hiairrassary7, Jean-Louis Divoux8, Christian Cipriani2, David Guiraud7, Luigi Raffo6, Eduardo Fernandez3,4, Thomas Stieglitz5, Stanisa Raspopovic9, Paolo M Rossini3,4, Silvestro Micera1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Hand amputation is a highly disabling event, which significantly affects quality of life. An effective hand replacement can be achieved if the user, in addition to motor functions, is provided with the sensations that are naturally perceived while grasping and moving. Intraneural peripheral electrodes have shown promising results toward the restoration of the sense of touch. However, the long-term usability and clinical relevance of intraneural sensory feedback have not yet been clearly demonstrated.
METHODS: To this aim, we performed a 6-month clinical study with 3 transradial amputees who received implants of transverse intrafascicular multichannel electrodes (TIMEs) in their median and ulnar nerves. After calibration, electrical stimulation was delivered through the TIMEs connected to artificial sensors in the digits of a prosthesis to generate sensory feedback, which was then used by the subjects while performing different grasping tasks.
RESULTS: All subjects, notwithstanding their important clinical differences, reported stimulation-induced sensations from the phantom hand for the whole duration of the trial. They also successfully integrated the sensory feedback into their motor control strategies while performing experimental tests simulating tasks of real life (with and without the support of vision). Finally, they reported a decrement of their phantom limb pain and a general improvement in mood state.
INTERPRETATION: The promising results achieved with all subjects show the feasibility of the use of intraneural stimulation in clinical settings. ANN NEUROL 2019;85:137-154.
© 2018 American Neurological Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30474259     DOI: 10.1002/ana.25384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurol        ISSN: 0364-5134            Impact factor:   10.422


  33 in total

Review 1.  Artificial referred sensation in upper and lower limb prosthesis users: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Gonzalez; Alex Bismuth; Christina Lee; Cynthia A Chestek; Deanna H Gates
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Spatio-temporal feature extraction in sensory electroneurographic signals.

Authors:  C Silveira; R N Khushaba; E Brunton; K Nazarpour
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.019

3.  Peripheral Nervous System Interfaces: Invasive or Non-invasive?

Authors:  Claudio Castellini
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.493

Review 4.  Flexible Electronics and Devices as Human-Machine Interfaces for Medical Robotics.

Authors:  Wenzheng Heng; Samuel Solomon; Wei Gao
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 32.086

5.  The Materials Science Foundation Supporting the Microfabrication of Reliable Polyimide-Metal Neuroelectronic Interfaces.

Authors:  Cary A Kuliasha; Jack W Judy
Journal:  Adv Mater Technol       Date:  2021-05-03

6.  Microtopographical patterns promote different responses in fibroblasts and Schwann cells: A possible feature for neural implants.

Authors:  Sahba Mobini; Cary A Kuliasha; Zachary A Siders; Nicole A Bohmann; Syed-Mustafa Jamal; Jack W Judy; Christine E Schmidt; Anthony B Brennan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 7.  Toward higher-performance bionic limbs for wider clinical use.

Authors:  Dario Farina; Ivan Vujaklija; Rickard Brånemark; Anthony M J Bull; Hans Dietl; Bernhard Graimann; Levi J Hargrove; Klaus-Peter Hoffmann; He Helen Huang; Thorvaldur Ingvarsson; Hilmar Bragi Janusson; Kristleifur Kristjánsson; Todd Kuiken; Silvestro Micera; Thomas Stieglitz; Agnes Sturma; Dustin Tyler; Richard F Ff Weir; Oskar C Aszmann
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 25.671

8.  Sensory Feedback in Hand Prostheses: A Prospective Study of Everyday Use.

Authors:  Ulrika Wijk; Ingela K Carlsson; Christian Antfolk; Anders Björkman; Birgitta Rosén
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Neural feedback strategies to improve grasping coordination in neuromusculoskeletal prostheses.

Authors:  Enzo Mastinu; Leonard F Engels; Francesco Clemente; Mariama Dione; Paolo Sassu; Oskar Aszmann; Rickard Brånemark; Bo Håkansson; Marco Controzzi; Johan Wessberg; Christian Cipriani; Max Ortiz-Catalan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Sensory- and Action-Oriented Embodiment of Neurally-Interfaced Robotic Hand Prostheses.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Pino; Daniele Romano; Chiara Spaccasassi; Alessandro Mioli; Marco D'Alonzo; Rinaldo Sacchetti; Eugenio Guglielmelli; Loredana Zollo; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Vincenzo Denaro; Angelo Maravita
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 5.152

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.