Literature DB >> 30473953

Can You Teach Yourself Point-of-care Ultrasound to a Level of Clinical Competency? Evaluation of a Self-directed Simulation-based Training Program.

Fraser D Mackay1, Felix Zhou2, David Lewis3, Jacqueline Fraser4, Paul R Atkinson4.   

Abstract

Introduction Self-directed learning in medical professions is established as an effective method of training in certain modalities. Furthermore, simulation technology is becoming widely used and accepted as a valid method of training for various medical skills, with ultrasound being one of the best studied. The use of point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) in the practice of emergency medicine is well established, and PoCUS is a core competency of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada emergency medicine standards. The primary goal of our study was to assess the effectiveness of a self-directed simulation-based training program for medical students, in terms of achieving competency in basic PoCUS scans. Methods Fourteen second-year medical students with no prior ultrasound experience were provided access to online study modules created by SonoSim ultrasound training solutions (SonoSim, Santa Monica, CA, US), covering ultrasound theory and methodology, and attended a two-hour introductory session where they were introduced to the study protocol, simulation equipment, and software. Participants then undertook self-directed ultrasound simulation training throughout the year, using the CAE Vimedix PoCUS simulator (CAE Healthcare, Sarasota, FL, US) and the SonoSim ultrasound training solution system. Upon reaching 10 (and 25) scans in each of the four categories (cardiac, abdomen, aorta, and pelvic), a triggered assessment was arranged in which participants scanned a live volunteer under the direct supervision of PoCUS-certified physicians. The physicians scored the participant attempts in terms of image acquisition, interpretation, and clinical understanding. No feedback was provided to the participants. Following the study, participants submitted feedback regarding the design of the study and were asked to rank their preferred training program protocols out of a provided list of five different options. Results At the first triggered assessment (after completing only 10 scans in each category), four out of 14 participants were scored as competent in the aorta scan, two out of 14 participants were competent in the pelvic scan, and none of the participants were competent in both the cardiac and abdominal scans. Only nine out of 14 participants completed the second triggered assessment (after completing 25 scans in each category). At the second assessment, only three participants were scored as competent in the aorta scan, two participants were competent in the cardiac scan, and one participant was competent in the pelvic scan. None of the 14 learners completed the final phase of the training and assessment protocol. Feedback following the termination of the study showed that none of the participants supported continuing the study protocol as designed originally, and the preferred study design consisted of a full-day introductory course with live models and simulation, followed by self-directed learning with simulation and live models until 50 scans in each category were achieved. Conclusion We were unable to demonstrate the achievement of competence in PoCUS in medical learners engaged in our combined self-directed simulation-based training program. This is in contrast to the considerable literature supporting self-directed learning and simulation-based learning for other skills. Feedback from faculty, curriculum integration, and alignment with clinical experience may be beneficial.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bedside ultrasonography; bedside ultrasound; pocus; point of care ultrasound; point-of-care; point-of-care ultrasound; self-directed learning; sim; simulation; ultrasound

Year:  2018        PMID: 30473953      PMCID: PMC6248742          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.3320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  10 in total

1.  Ultrasound training: the virtual patient.

Authors:  I M Heer; K Middendorf; S Müller-Egloff; M Dugas; A Strauss
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 2.  The effectiveness of self-directed learning in health professions education: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mohammad H Murad; Fernando Coto-Yglesias; Prathibha Varkey; Larry J Prokop; Angela L Murad
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  Comparison of a multimedia simulator to a human model for teaching FAST exam image interpretation and image acquisition.

Authors:  Sara Damewood; Donald Jeanmonod; Beth Cadigan
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Emergency medicine ultrasonography: national survey of family medicine-emergency medicine program directors.

Authors:  Michael Y Woo; Chris Nussbaum; A Curtis Lee
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 5.  International Federation for Emergency Medicine point of care ultrasound curriculum.

Authors:  Paul Atkinson; Justin Bowra; Mike Lambert; Hein Lamprecht; Vicki Noble; Bob Jarman
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.410

6.  Ultrasound Guidelines: Emergency, Point-of-Care and Clinical Ultrasound Guidelines in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Effect of a point-of-care ultrasound protocol on the diagnostic performance of medical learners during simulated cardiorespiratory scenarios.

Authors:  Adam R Parks; Glenn Verheul; Denise LeBlanc-Duchin; Paul Atkinson
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.410

8.  Echo simulator with novel training and competency testing tools.

Authors:  Florence H Sheehan; Catherine M Otto; Rosario V Freeman
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2013

9.  Effects of simulation-based practice on focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) window identification, acquisition, and diagnosis.

Authors:  Gregory K W K Chung; Ruth G Gyllenhammer; Eva L Baker; Eric Savitsky
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 10.  Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review.

Authors:  S Barry Issenberg; William C McGaghie; Emil R Petrusa; David Lee Gordon; Ross J Scalese
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.650

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Hands-On Time in Simulation-Based Ultrasound Training - A Dose-Related Response Study.

Authors:  Oria Mahmood; Rikke Jørgensen; Kristina Nielsen; Lars Konge; Lene Russell
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2022-05-03

2.  Adaptation of an anatomy graduate course in ultrasound imaging from in-person to live, remote instruction during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Robert M DePhilip; Melissa M Quinn
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 6.652

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.