| Literature DB >> 30473856 |
Fangyu Fan1, Zongling Yang1, Han Li1, Zhengjun Shi1, Huan Kan1.
Abstract
Macadamia nut shell (MNS) is a type of waste lignocellulose obtained from macadamia nut production processing. Large MNS wastes caused serious resource waste and environmental pollution. So, preparation of hydrochars from MNS via hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is of great significance. HTC of MNS was conducted to study the effect of process parameters, including HTC temperature (180-260°C) and residence time (60-180 min) on the properties of hydrochars. Results showed that the increase in HTC temperature and residence time decreased the mass yield of hydrochars and increased the high heating value of hydrochars. Furthermore, the C content of hydrochars increased, whereas the H and O contents decreased. Mass yield of hydrochar is 46.59%, energy yield is 64.55% and the higher heating value is 26.02 MJ kg-1 at a temperature of 260°C and time of 120 min. The surface structure of hydrochars was rougher compared with that of MNS as observed via scanning electron microscopy. The chemical and combustion behaviour of MNS and hydrochars was analysed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis indicated that decarboxylation and dehydration reactions were the predominant pathways during the HTC process. Results showed that HTC can facilitate the transformation of MNS into solid fuel.Entities:
Keywords: hydrochar; hydrothermal carbonization; macadamia nut shell; property
Year: 2018 PMID: 30473856 PMCID: PMC6227982 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.181126
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Proximate analysis, HHV, and mass and energy yields of MNS and hydrochars.
| proximate analysisa (wt%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| samples | VM | FC | ash | HHV (MJ kg−1) | mass yield (%) | energy yield (%) | energy densification | BET surface area (m2 g−1) |
| MNS | 77.68 | 19.81 | 2.51 | 18.78 | — | — | — | 0.2765 |
| MNS220–60 | 69.62 | 27.62 | 2.76 | 22.75 | 63.73 | 77.20 | 1.21 | 3.9012 |
| MNS220–120 | 66.81 | 29.91 | 3.28 | 23.99 | 56.81 | 72.57 | 1.28 | 5.3241 |
| MNS220–180 | 63.56 | 32.47 | 3.97 | 24.68 | 52.22 | 68.63 | 1.31 | 11.6548 |
| MNS180–120 | 71.58 | 25.44 | 2.98 | 21.67 | 72.42 | 83.56 | 1.15 | 2.6227 |
| MNS260–120 | 54.98 | 40.81 | 4.21 | 26.02 | 46.59 | 64.55 | 1.39 | 12.4125 |
aVM, volatile matter; FC, fixed carbon; HHV, higher heating value.
Ultimate analysis of MNS and hydrochars.
| ultimate analysis (wt%) | atomic ratioa | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| samples | C | H | Ob | N | S | O/C | H/C |
| MNS | 49.15 | 5.51 | 42.12 | 0.59 | 0.12 | 0.64 | 1.35 |
| MNS220–60 | 53.63 | 5.47 | 37.20 | 0.76 | 0.18 | 0.52 | 1.22 |
| MNS220–120 | 55.68 | 5.41 | 34.78 | 0.68 | 0.17 | 0.47 | 1.17 |
| MNS220–180 | 57.90 | 5.23 | 32.17 | 0.63 | 0.10 | 0.42 | 1.08 |
| MNS180–120 | 51.32 | 5.44 | 39.47 | 0.69 | 0.10 | 0.58 | 1.27 |
| MNS260–120 | 64.90 | 4.91 | 24.85 | 0.98 | 0.15 | 0.29 | 0.90 |
aO/C and H/C were given in atomic ratio.
bOxygen content was obtained by difference.
Figure 1.Van Krevelen diagram for MNS and hydrochars at different conditions. Three typical fuel coals including lignite, subbituminous coal and bituminous coal are shown for comparison.
Figure 2.FTIR spectra of MNS and hydrochars.
Figure 3.SEM image of MNS and hydrochars: (a) raw MNS, (b) MNS180–120, (c) MNS220–60, (d) MNS220–120, (e) MNS220–180 and (f) MNS260–120.
Figure 4.TG and differential thermogravimetric curves of MNS and hydrochars.