| Literature DB >> 30473629 |
Khaled W Sadek1,2, Mahmoud Y Haik1,2, Anas A Ashour1,2, Tahira Baloch3, Tahar Aboulkassim3, Amber Yasmeen3, Semir Vranic1, Asad Zeidan1, Ala-Eddin Al Moustafa1,2,4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the increasing popularity of water-pipe smoking (WPS), it is critical to comprehend how WPS may affect women's health. The main goal of this study is to identify the potential outcome of WPS on human breast cancer progression.Entities:
Keywords: Breast cancer; Cell adhesion; Cell invasion; EMT; Erk1/Erk2 pathways; Water-pipe smoking
Year: 2018 PMID: 30473629 PMCID: PMC6234648 DOI: 10.1186/s12935-018-0678-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Cell Int ISSN: 1475-2867 Impact factor: 5.722
Fig. 1Effects of water-pipe smoking (WPS) on colony formation in human breast cancer cell lines. WPS slightly enhances colony formation of MCF7 and BT20 cell lines in comparison with their control cells. Clonogenic cell assay and WPS exposure were performed as described in “Materials and methods” section
Fig. 2WPS stimulates epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) of breast cancer cell lines, MCF7 and BT20. We note that treatment for 3 days with 200 μg/ml of WPS solution induces morphological changes from “epithelial-like” (control) cells into “fibroblast-like” (mesenchymal) phenotype, which is known as EMT
Fig. 3Effect of WPS on cell invasion of human breast cancer cells. The results from matrigel invasion assay indicate that WPS enhances cell invasion ability of MCF7 and BT20 cell lines by approximately 35% in comparison with their control cells. The histograms show mean ± SD (P < 0.002 and 0.001, respectively; t-test was used and is considered significant with P < 0.05). The cancer cells were treated with 200 μg of WPS solution for 2 days as described in “Materials and methods” section
Fig. 4Western blot analysis of E-cadherin, FAK and p-Erk1/Erk2 in MCF7 and BT20 cell lines under the effect of WPS. We notice that WPS decreases/increases the expression patterns of E-cadherin and FAK, respectively, in both cell lines in comparison with control cells; meanwhile, WPS stimulates Erk1/Erk2 phosphorylation in these two cell lines. GAPDH was used as a control. Cells were treated with WPS solution as explained in “Materials and methods” section as well as “Results” section
Fig. 5Quantification of the western blot analysis of E-cadherin, FAK and Erk1/Erk2 phosphorylation as well as GAPDH in MCF7 and BT20 exposed to WPS and unexposed (control) cells. This analysis confirms the downregulation of E-cadherin in both cell lines; in parallel, WPS enhances FAK expression and Erk1/Erk2 phosphorylation in the two cell lines in comparison with their control cells. The quantification of both data by ImageJ 64-bit version 1.50b program