BACKGROUND: Smoking tobacco preparations in a water pipe (hookah) is widespread in many places of the world and is perceived by many as relatively safe. We investigated biomarkers of toxicant exposure with water pipe compared with cigarette smoking. METHODS: We conducted a crossover study to assess daily nicotine and carcinogen exposure with water pipe and cigarette smoking in 13 people who were experienced in using both products. RESULTS: When smoking an average of 3 water pipe sessions compared with smoking 11 cigarettes per day (cpd), water pipe use was associated with a significantly lower intake of nicotine, greater exposure to carbon monoxide (CO), and a different pattern of carcinogen exposure compared with cigarette smoking, with greater exposure to benzene, and high molecular weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH), but less exposure to tobacco-specific nitrosamines, 1,3-butadiene, acrolein, acrylonitrile, propylene oxide, ethylene oxide, and low molecular weight PAHs. CONCLUSIONS: A different pattern of carcinogen exposure might result in a different cancer risk profile between cigarette and water pipe smoking. Of particular concern is the risk of leukemia related to high levels of benzene exposure with water pipe use. IMPACT: Smoking tobacco in water pipes has gained popularity in the United States and around the world. Many believe that water pipe smoking is not addictive and less harmful than cigarette smoking. We provide data on toxicant exposure that will help guide regulation and public education regarding water pipe health risk.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Smoking tobacco preparations in a water pipe (hookah) is widespread in many places of the world and is perceived by many as relatively safe. We investigated biomarkers of toxicant exposure with water pipe compared with cigarette smoking. METHODS: We conducted a crossover study to assess daily nicotine and carcinogen exposure with water pipe and cigarette smoking in 13 people who were experienced in using both products. RESULTS: When smoking an average of 3 water pipe sessions compared with smoking 11 cigarettes per day (cpd), water pipe use was associated with a significantly lower intake of nicotine, greater exposure to carbon monoxide (CO), and a different pattern of carcinogen exposure compared with cigarette smoking, with greater exposure to benzene, and high molecular weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH), but less exposure to tobacco-specific nitrosamines, 1,3-butadiene, acrolein, acrylonitrile, propylene oxide, ethylene oxide, and low molecular weight PAHs. CONCLUSIONS: A different pattern of carcinogen exposure might result in a different cancer risk profile between cigarette and water pipe smoking. Of particular concern is the risk of leukemia related to high levels of benzene exposure with water pipe use. IMPACT: Smoking tobacco in water pipes has gained popularity in the United States and around the world. Many believe that water pipe smoking is not addictive and less harmful than cigarette smoking. We provide data on toxicant exposure that will help guide regulation and public education regarding water pipe health risk.
Authors: Brian A Primack; Ariel Shensa; Kevin H Kim; Mary V Carroll; Mary T Hoban; E Victor Leino; Thomas Eissenberg; Kathleen H Dachille; Michael J Fine Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2012-05-28 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Isaac M Lipkus; Thomas Eissenberg; Rochelle D Schwartz-Bloom; Alexander V Prokhorov; Janet Levy Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2011-04-06 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Jens Schubert; Jürgen Hahn; Gerhard Dettbarn; Albrecht Seidel; Andreas Luch; Thomas G Schulz Journal: Toxicol Lett Date: 2011-06-25 Impact factor: 4.372
Authors: Maciej L Goniewicz; Christopher M Havel; Margaret Wilson Peng; Peyton Jacob; Delia Dempsey; Lisa Yu; Wioleta Zielinska-Danch; Bartosz Koszowski; Jan Czogala; Andrzej Sobczak; Neal L Benowitz Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Peyton Jacob; Christopher Havel; Do-Hoon Lee; Lisa Yu; Mark D Eisner; Neal L Benowitz Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2008-10-08 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Gideon St Helen; Peyton Jacob; Margaret Peng; Delia A Dempsey; S Katharine Hammond; Neal L Benowitz Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Marielle C Brinkman; Hyoshin Kim; Sydney M Gordon; Robyn R Kroeger; Iza L Reyes; Dawn M Deojay; Caleb Chitwood; Timothy E Lane; Pamela I Clark Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Nada O F Kassem; Noura O Kassem; Sandy Liles; Sheila R Jackson; Dale A Chatfield; Peyton Jacob; Neal L Benowitz; Melbourne F Hovell Journal: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 3.271
Authors: Arash Etemadi; Hossein Poustchi; Cindy M Chang; Benjamin C Blount; Antonia M Calafat; Lanqing Wang; Victor R De Jesus; Akram Pourshams; Ramin Shakeri; Meredith S Shiels; Maki Inoue-Choi; Bridget K Ambrose; Carol H Christensen; Baoguang Wang; Gwen Murphy; Xiaoyun Ye; Deepak Bhandari; Jun Feng; Baoyun Xia; Connie S Sosnoff; Farin Kamangar; Paul Brennan; Paolo Boffetta; Sanford M Dawsey; Christian C Abnet; Reza Malekzadeh; Neal D Freedman Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-01-08 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Cindy M Chang; Selvin H Edwards; Aarthi Arab; Arseima Y Del Valle-Pinero; Ling Yang; Dorothy K Hatsukami Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Brian A Primack; Peter Freedman-Doan; Jaime E Sidani; Daniel Rosen; Ariel Shensa; A Everette James; John Wallace Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 5.043