Literature DB >> 3047340

Dose-response in the treatment of breast cancer: a critical review.

I C Henderson1, D F Hayes, R Gelman.   

Abstract

In animal tumor models the dose-response curve for cytotoxic agents, especially cyclophosphamide, may be steep, but the slope and shape of this curve depends not only on the drug used but on the schedule of drug administration, the specific tumor type, tumor cell kinetics, and tumor mass. It might be anticipated from these studies that the human tumors most sensitive to dose effects would be leukemia, lymphoma, small-cell carcinoma of the lung, and testicular tumors rather than the low growth fraction, relatively less responsive tumors such as breast cancer. However, the clinical evidence for a steep dose-response curve in any tumor type is limited. For breast cancer such evidence is largely retrospective or derived from uncontrolled trials. The data available from randomized trials makes it seem unlikely that small, or even moderate, reductions in drug dose for nontrivial reasons will compromise the survival of patients with either early or metastatic disease. In spite of promising data from small trials, there is, as yet, inadequate evidence to justify the use of very-high-dose therapy and autologous marrow transplant outside the setting of a well-designed clinical trial. The value of high-dose therapy, intensive dose rate, and cumulative drug dose should each be studied in randomized controlled trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3047340     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.9.1501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  31 in total

Review 1.  Systemic therapy of advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  H T Mouridsen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Overview of new treatments for breast cancer.

Authors:  G N Hortobagyi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Selecting dose-intense drug combinations: metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  E L Korn; R Simon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of anticancer drugs.

Authors:  W E Evans; M V Relling
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  [High dose chemotherapy of solid tumors].

Authors:  K Höffken; R Kath; H J Fricke; K Blumenstengel; W Vogel; H G Sayer
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1997-07-15

Review 6.  Recombinant methionyl granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim): a new dimension in immunotherapy.

Authors:  G Schwab; T Hecht
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 7.  A risk-benefit assessment of anthracycline antibiotics in antineoplastic therapy.

Authors:  R Abraham; R L Basser; M D Green
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 8.  Adjuvant systemic therapy: state of the art, 1989.

Authors:  I C Henderson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Compliance of physicians and patients with a consensus protocol for treatment of advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  F Porzsolt; G Meuret; E D Kreuser; S Mende; L Buchelt; P Strigl; M Redenbacher; F Klumpp; M Schmelz; R Knöchelmann
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Mitoxantrone plus vinorelbine with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) support in advanced breast cancer patients. A dose and schedule finding study.

Authors:  G Frasci; G Comella; P Comella; F Salzano; L Cremone; N Della Volpe; A Imbriani; G Persico
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.