Literature DB >> 30473242

Postoperative radiographic findings of an uncemented convertible short stem for anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Patric Raiss1, Marc Schnetzke2, Thomas Wittmann3, Christopher M Kilian4, T Bradley Edwards4, Patrick J Denard5, Lionel Neyton6, Arnaud Godenèche6, Gilles Walch6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several short-stemmed press-fit humeral components have been developed in recent years for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) as well as reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Varying radiographic outcomes have been reported, with some studies reporting concerning rates of aseptic loosening. This study analyzed the radiographic findings of a press-fit convertible short-stemmed humeral component in both TSA and RSA.
METHODS: There were 150 anatomic TSAs (group 1) and 77 RSAs (group 2) analyzed radiographically at a minimum follow-up of 2 years postoperatively. Plain radiographs were reviewed for stem loosening, alignment, signs of stress shielding, and the filling ratio.
RESULTS: At final follow-up, 49% of group 1 and 65% of group 2 had no evidence for radiographic changes. In those with radiographic changes, low bone adaptions were found in 83% and high adaptions in 17% in both groups. Larger stem sizes with higher filling ratios were associated with high radiographic adaptions in both groups (P = .02). The overall filling ratios were higher in group 2 (P = .002). Cortical contact of the stem led to higher bone adaptions (P = .014).
CONCLUSIONS: The short humeral component analyzed in this study showed encouraging survival rates without aseptic loosening. Radiographic changes are associated with a higher filling ratio and cortical contact of the stem. Surgeons should aim to achieve fixation with the minimal required canal filling to minimize radiographic changes with the uncemented humeral component used in this study.
Copyright © 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Shoulder arthroplasty; arthroplasty; humeral component; humeral stem; reverse arthroplasty; shoulder; shoulder replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30473242     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  16 in total

1.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture in the elderly. Cemented or uncemented stem?

Authors:  Yaiza Lopiz; Carlos García-Fernandez; María Vallejo-Carrasco; Daniel Garriguez-Pérez; Loreto Achaerandio; Carmen Tesoro-Gonzalo; Fernando Marco
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Stem size prediction in shoulder arthroplasty with preoperative 3D planning.

Authors:  Thomas Wittmann; Nima Befrui; Tim Rieger; Patric Raiss
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 2.928

3.  Specific Design of a Press Fit Humeral Stem Provides low Stress Shielding in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty at minimum 5 Years FU.

Authors:  Geoffroy Nourissat; Simon Corsia; Howard W Harris; Pierre-Alban Bouché
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2022-07-06

4.  Humeral stem with low filling ratio reduces stress shielding in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Su Cheol Kim; Jong Hun Park; Hashem Bukhary; Jae Chul Yoo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.479

5.  Treating cuff tear arthropathy by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical and the radiological outcome?

Authors:  Malte Holschen; Alexandros Kiriazis; Benjamin Bockmann; Tobias L Schulte; Kai-Axel Witt; Jörn Steinbeck
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-04-20

6.  Using standard-length compactors to implant short humeral stems in total shoulder arthroplasty: A cadaver study of humeral stem alignment.

Authors:  Stanislas Gunst; Ana Nigues; Jérôme Vogels; Elvire Servien; Sébastien Lustig; Laurent Nove-Josserand; Philippe Collotte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part II.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Alexander M Roche; Spencer W Sullivan; Benjamin T Gaal; Stewart Dalton; Arjun Sharma; Joseph J King; Brian M Grawe; Surena Namdari; Macy Lawler; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-10

8.  Proximal humeral bony adaptations with a short uncemented stem for shoulder arthroplasty: a quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Lisa Peduzzi; Thomas Goetzmann; Frank Wein; Olivier Roche; François Sirveaux; Daniel Mole; Adrien Jacquot
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-11-29

9.  Current state of short-stem implants in total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Brandon J Erickson; Peter N Chalmers; Patrick J Denard; Reuben Gobezie; Anthony A Romeo; Evan S Lederman
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-01-28

10.  Problems, complications, and reinterventions in 4893 onlay humeral lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasties: a systematic review (part I-complications).

Authors:  Francesco Ascione; Alfredo Schiavone Panni; Adriano Braile; Katia Corona; Giuseppe Toro; Nicola Capuano; Alfonso M Romano
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2021-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.