Yuanchang Zhao1, Yongliang Wang1, Anwesha Sarkar1, Xuefeng Wang2. 1. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, 12 Physics Hall, Ames, IA 50011, USA. 2. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, 12 Physics Hall, Ames, IA 50011, USA; Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology Interdepartmental Program, Molecular Biology Building, Ames, IA 50011, USA. Electronic address: xuefeng@iastate.edu.
Abstract
Rapid cell migration requires efficient rear de-adhesion. It remains undetermined whether cells mechanically detach or biochemically disassemble integrin-mediated rear adhesion sites in highly motile cells such as keratocytes. Using molecular tension sensor, we calibrated and mapped integrin tension in migrating keratocytes. Our experiments revealed that high-level integrin tension abbreviated as HIT, in the range of 50-100 pN (piconewton) and capable of rupturing integrin-ligand bonds, is exclusively and narrowly generated at cell rear margin during cell migration. Co-imaging of HIT and focal adhesions (FAs) shows that HIT is produced to mechanically peel off FAs that lag behind, and HIT intensity is correlated with the local cell retraction rate. High-level molecular tension was also consistently generated at the cell margin during artificially induced cell front retraction and during keratocyte migration mediated by biotin-streptavidin bonds. Collectively, these experiments provide direct evidence showing that migrating keratocytes concentrate force at the cell rear margin to mediate rear de-adhesion.
Rapid cell migration requires efficient rear de-adhesion. It remains undetermined whether cells mechanically detach or biochemically disassemble integrin-mediated rear adhesion sites in highly motile cells such as keratocytes. Using molecular tension sensor, we calibrated and mapped integrin tension in migrating keratocytes. Our experiments revealed that high-level integrin tension abbreviated as HIT, in the range of 50-100 pN (piconewton) and capable of rupturing integrin-ligand bonds, is exclusively and narrowly generated at cell rear margin during cell migration. Co-imaging of HIT and focal adhesions (FAs) shows that HIT is produced to mechanically peel off FAs that lag behind, and HIT intensity is correlated with the local cell retraction rate. High-level molecular tension was also consistently generated at the cell margin during artificially induced cell front retraction and during keratocyte migration mediated by biotin-streptavidin bonds. Collectively, these experiments provide direct evidence showing that migrating keratocytes concentrate force at the cell rear margin to mediate rear de-adhesion.
Eukaryotic cell migration is crucially important for immunity (Luster et al., 2005), development (Weijer, 2009), wound healing (Poujade et al., 2007) and many other physiological processes (Lamalice et al., 2007, Yilmaz and Christofori, 2010). Cellular force plays a pivotal role to drive and regulate cell migration (Huttenlocher and Horwitz, 2011, Sheetz et al., 1998), which is typically orchestrated by two critical motion modules: cell protrusion in the leading edge and de-adhesion in the trailing edge (Gardel et al., 2010, Pollard and Borisy, 2003). The cellular force mediating cell protrusion has been well studied and understood. Actin network polymerizes in the cell leading edge and pushes the cell membrane forward, thus advancing the cell front edge (Le Clainche and Carlier, 2008, Theriot and Mitchison, 1991). In contrast, how cells detach the rear adhesion sites in the trailing edge is not fully understood. During cell migration, the adhering integrins in the cell rear region need be efficiently detached from the surface ligands to facilitate cell migration. Previously it was suggested that cells may biochemically regulate integrin de-adhesion in less motile cells (Franco and Huttenlocher, 2005). For example, protein calpain has been shown to mediate the release of cell-substrate adhesion during fibroblast migration (Palecek et al., 1998, Undyala et al., 2008). However, biochemical regulation of cell de-adhesion may not be efficient in highly motile cells such as keratocytes, which are capable of migrating at a rate higher than 10 μm/min (Maiuri et al., 2012). A plausible mechanism of cell rear de-adhesion with higher efficiency could be mechanical dissociation of integrin-ligand bonds by cellular force at the cell rear, as mechanical signals propagate faster than biochemical signals in cells (Houk et al., 2012). In this mechanism, cells may produce high integrin tension at the level of integrin-ligand bond strength at the cell trailing edge to mechanically break integrin-ligand bonds and facilitate cell rear de-adhesion and migration. Therefore, measuring and mapping integrin tension in migrating cells would yield important insights to the mechanism of cell migration. Integrin tension has been calibrated in stationary or low motile cells (Galior et al., 2016, Liu et al., 2013, Liu et al., 2014, Wang et al., 2015, Wang and Wang, 2016). However, before this work, no experiments have calibrated or mapped integrin tension in fast migrating cells.Here we applied integrative tension sensor (ITS) to calibrate and map integrin tension in migrating cells with submicron resolution and high sensitivity. ITS was previously developed to map integrin tension in platelets (Wang et al., 2017). By converting integrin tension above a designed threshold to fluorescent signal, ITS enables integrin tension mapping directly by fluorescence imaging. Using ITS, here we calibrated and mapped integrin tension in fish epidermal keratocytes, which are classic cell models for the study of rapid cell migration in a crawling mode. Our experiments revealed that migrating keratocytes generate integrin tension in the range of 50–100 pN exclusively at the cell rear margin to rupture the local integrin-ligand bonds, peel off focal adhesions (FAs), and mediate cell de-adhesion.
Results
Mapping Integrin Tension in Migrating Keratocytes Using Molecular Tension Sensor
Using ITS, we mapped integrin molecular tension in migrating keratocytes. ITS was previously developed in our laboratory to study platelet force during adhesion and contraction (Wang and Ha, 2013, Wang et al., 2017). ITS converts molecular tension signal to fluorescence on site, thus enabling integrin tension mapping directly by fluorescence imaging. Briefly, as shown in Figure 1A, ITS is an 18 base-paired (bp) double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) decorated with a fluorophore Cy3, a quencher (BHQ2, black hole quencher), a biotin tag, and an integrin peptide ligand RGD (Arginine-glycine-aspartic acid), which targets a broad range of integrins, such as integrins αVβ3, αIIbβ3, and α5β1 (Mondal et al., 2013). The BHQ2 quencher efficiently suppresses fluorescence of the Cy3 with 96.6% quenching efficiency (Figure S1), close to 98% contact quenching (Crisalli and Kool, 2011). On a surface grafted with ITS, integrin of adherent cells binds to the integrin ligand and transmits a tension to the dsDNA through the integrin-ligand bond. If the tension is higher than the tension tolerance of the dsDNA (Ttol, critical force required for dsDNA dissociation with force application time in seconds, tunable in the range of 12–54 pN) (Wang and Ha, 2013), the dsDNA will be dissociated and the Cy3 will be freed from quenching, thus converting tension signal to fluorescent signal in situ (Wang et al., 2017). ITS activation is irreversible and therefore records all dsDNA-dissociating integrin tensions on the surface. This signal accumulation process greatly enhances the sensitivity for integrin tension mapping. This is particularly important for the study of migrating cells in which cellular force is transient and constantly changing.
Figure 1
High-Level Integrin Tension (HIT) Is Exclusively Generated at Cell Rear Margin in Migrating Keratocytes
(A) Schematics of integrative tension sensor (ITS). ITS is a surface-immobilized 18-bp dsDNA labeled by an integrin ligand and a fluorophore-quencher pair. ITS permanently turns to fluoresce if the tension transmitted by integrin-ligand bond ruptures the dsDNA, which has a tension tolerance (Ttol) of 54 pN.
(B) Integrin tension (>54 pN) of a migrating keratocyte was mapped on the ITS surface by fluorescence imaging. Refer to Video S1.
(C) Keratocytes produced no signal on the ligand-null ITS surface.
(D) Keratocytes produced no fluorescence loss on the quencher-null ITS with Ttol determined by biotin-streptavidin bond strength (the ligand and the biotin are conjugated to the same strand).
(E) Integrin tension (>54 pN) of a stationary CHO-K1 cell was mapped on the ITS surface.
(F) Linear profile analysis of the image brightness in the regions marked by yellow dashed lines in (B). The sharp brightness increases in phase contrast (PH) and Cy3 (ITS) channels mark the cell margin and the active site of integrin tension generation, respectively.
(G) Cell margin and ITS border represented by the peaks of derivative curves of linear profiles in (F). The peak locations are marked by red dashed lines.
High-Level Integrin Tension (HIT) Is Exclusively Generated at Cell Rear Margin in Migrating Keratocytes(A) Schematics of integrative tension sensor (ITS). ITS is a surface-immobilized 18-bp dsDNA labeled by an integrin ligand and a fluorophore-quencher pair. ITS permanently turns to fluoresce if the tension transmitted by integrin-ligand bond ruptures the dsDNA, which has a tension tolerance (Ttol) of 54 pN.(B) Integrin tension (>54 pN) of a migrating keratocyte was mapped on the ITS surface by fluorescence imaging. Refer to Video S1.(C) Keratocytes produced no signal on the ligand-null ITS surface.(D) Keratocytes produced no fluorescence loss on the quencher-null ITS with Ttol determined by biotin-streptavidin bond strength (the ligand and the biotin are conjugated to the same strand).(E) Integrin tension (>54 pN) of a stationary CHO-K1 cell was mapped on the ITS surface.(F) Linear profile analysis of the image brightness in the regions marked by yellow dashed lines in (B). The sharp brightness increases in phase contrast (PH) and Cy3 (ITS) channels mark the cell margin and the active site of integrin tension generation, respectively.(G) Cell margin and ITS border represented by the peaks of derivative curves of linear profiles in (F). The peak locations are marked by red dashed lines.In this paper, we studied integrin tension at a high level in keratocytes using ITS at Ttol = 54 pN, which is the critical force to rupture 18-bp dsDNA in a shear geometry with a force dwell time of 2 s (Hatch et al., 2008). ITS is immobilized on a glass surface by biotin-streptavidin interaction. The dsDNA in the ITS has undetectable spontaneous dissociation in the time span of the experiments (1–2 hr) at room temperature (25°C), suggesting that the ITS is thermally stable. The surface coating is also doped with fibronectin to assist cell adhesion and minimize the influence of ITS rupture to cell normal migration. Keratocytes were plated on the ITS surface. At room temperature, most keratocytes polarized and migrated normally in about 15 min. Strong fluorescence signal was produced by migrating keratocytes on the ITS surface (Figure 1B and Video S1). Hence, integrin tension stronger than 54 pN in keratocytes was directly mapped by fluorescence imaging. To confirm that the fluorescence signal was indeed activated by integrin tension, we plated keratocytes on a surface coated with ligand-null ITS, which has no integrin ligand. Migrating keratocytes produced no fluorescence signal on the ligand-null ITS surface (Figure 1C), confirming that the fluorescence on the regular ITS surface was activated by integrin tension. The integrins transmitting high tensions are likely to be integrin α5β1 or αVβ3 as demonstrated by previous research (Riaz et al., 2016). To determine the upper limit of integrin tension in keratocytes, we prepared another construct of ITS in which integrin ligand and biotin are conjugated to the same single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) at two ends (Figure 1D). The Ttol of this ITS construct is determined by biotin-streptavidin bond strength, which was calibrated to be around 100 pN with force dwell time of seconds (Pincet and Husson, 2005). The complementary ssDNA is conjugated with Cy3 dye. Integrin tension capable of rupturing biotin-streptavidin bonds would remove Cy3 dyes from the surface and cause local fluorescence loss. However, keratocytes left no detectable fluorescence signal on the biotin-streptavidin-based ITS surface, indicating that the integrin tension generated by migrating keratocytes is generally lower than the bond strength of biotin-streptavidin.
Video S1. High-Level Integrin Tension Was Exclusively Localized on the Membrane Boundary, Related to Figure 1
This video demonstrates that ITS with Ttol = 54 pN was exclusively activated on the cell membrane boundary, showing that high-level integrin tensions are located on the membrane boundary during keratocyte migration. The video was recorded with a frame interval of 10 s and played with a frame rate of 6 frames/s.
Integrin Tension Is Exclusively and Narrowly Generated at Cell Rear Margin in Migrating Cells
Using ITS with Ttol = 54 pN, we mapped the high-level integrin tension (HIT) in migrating keratocytes. The most striking feature of HIT map in migrating keratocytes is that the HIT is exclusively and narrowly generated at the cell rear margin (Figure 1B and Video S1). The cell rear margin shown by phase-contrast (PH) imaging consistently overlaps with the border of HIT regions during the entire process of keratocyte migration. On the contrary, in stationary CHO-K1 cells, HIT is globally generated underneath the cell bodies without being restricted to the cell margin (Figure 1E). Line profile analysis over the region marked by yellow lines in Figure 1B were calculated and plotted in Figure 1F. The cell margin and the border of HIT map reported by the sharp brightness increases in the two curves clearly overlap with each other. To better confirm their co-localization, we computed the derivatives of the two curves in Figure 1F and plotted them in Figure 1G. The peaks of derivative curves marking the cell margin and the border of activated ITS regions, respectively, is co-localized with each other with a precision of 0.5 μm. This narrow co-localization verifies that HIT is generated at the cell rear margin within a submicron margin width, suggesting that HIT is highly concentrated at the cell trailing edge.
HIT Is in Range of 50–100 pN
The critical forces to rupture a dsDNA and a biotin-streptavidin bond are both dependent on the force dwell time. To use the Ttol value of ITS to evaluate integrin tension, the dwell time of integrin tension must be in the same range of the ITS calibration time. Based on the narrow sites for HIT generation, we estimated the dwell time of HIT at the keratocyte rear margin. Because the cell migration rate is 10–20 μm/min and the width of HIT generation is around 1 μm (the width of the slope of ITS curve in Figure 1F), the cell edge should sweep through the HIT region in less than 10 s. Therefore, the dwell time of integrin tension at the cell rear margin should be in the range of seconds, matching the force dwell time ranges used for the Ttol calibrations of dsDNA (Hatch et al., 2008) in the 54-pN ITS and biotin-streptavidin bond (Pincet and Husson, 2005) in the 100-pN ITS. Therefore, it is valid to use these Ttol values to evaluate the integrin tension range in keratocytes. We conclude that HIT is in the range of 50–100 pN during keratocyte migration.
HIT Is Capable of Rupturing Integrin-Ligand Bonds
Keratocytes produce integrin tension that readily ruptures 18-bp dsDNA. We reasoned that such tension is produced to break integrin-ligand bonds at the cell trailing edge to facilitate cell rear de-adhesion. This is supported by two lines of evidence. First, integrin-ligand bond strength was calibrated to be in the range of 30–40 pN with force application time of seconds in a previous study (Kong et al., 2009). The bond strength is at a level comparable with the 54 pN Ttol of ITS. Therefore, the HIT reported by ITS should be capable of rupturing integrin-ligand bond with a high probability. Second, we enhanced integrin-ligand bond strength by adding 2 mM Mn2+ (Kong et al., 2009) in the medium (Figure 2A, Video S2), and the ITS signal was immediately increased by 2.5-fold in a migrating keratocyte (Figures 2B and 2C), suggesting that considerable amount of integrin-ligand bonds were ruptured in company with ITS activation under normal physiological condition if without the addition of Mn2+. Therefore, we inferred that keratocytes generate integrin tension at the level of integrin-ligand bond strength during migration, and the 54-pN ITS signal reports the location where integrin-ligand bonds are mechanically dissociated by cells. “High-level integrin tension” (HIT) in the following context specifically refers to the tension reported by ITS with Ttol = 54 pN that is capable of rupturing integrin-ligand bonds under normal physiological condition.
Figure 2
Enhancing Integrin-Ligand Bond Strength with 2 mM Mn2+ Led to Stronger ITS Signal
(A) Time-series HIT maps of a migrating keratocyte. At t = 7 min after starting imaging, 2 mM Mn2+ was added to the cell medium. The images were processed based on Video S2.
(B) HIT map segmentation by time. This map region was processed from the area of Figure 2A marked by yellow dashed line.
(C) ITS signal intensity analysis. The ITS signal was immediately increased by 2 mM Mn2+ by 2.5-fold, suggesting that integrin-ligand bond dissociation is in company with ITS activation under normal physiological condition, and ITS signal can report the location where integrin-ligand bonds are mechanically dissociated. The ITS signal was calculated by averaging the grayscale values of pixels in the rectangular grids in Figure 2B.
Enhancing Integrin-Ligand Bond Strength with 2 mM Mn2+ Led to Stronger ITS Signal(A) Time-series HIT maps of a migrating keratocyte. At t = 7 min after starting imaging, 2 mM Mn2+ was added to the cell medium. The images were processed based on Video S2.(B) HIT map segmentation by time. This map region was processed from the area of Figure 2A marked by yellow dashed line.(C) ITS signal intensity analysis. The ITS signal was immediately increased by 2 mM Mn2+ by 2.5-fold, suggesting that integrin-ligand bond dissociation is in company with ITS activation under normal physiological condition, and ITS signal can report the location where integrin-ligand bonds are mechanically dissociated. The ITS signal was calculated by averaging the grayscale values of pixels in the rectangular grids in Figure 2B.
Video S2. ITS Signal of Migrating Keratocytes Treated with 2 mM Mn2+, Related to Figure 2
At t = 7 min, 2 mM Mn2+ was added. The video was recorded with a frame interval of 1 min and played with a frame rate of 4 frames/s.
HIT Peels off Focal Adhesions Lagging behind at the Cell Rear Margin
ITS enables the simultaneous imaging of cellular force and cellular structure at submicron resolution. Because integrin clusters called FAs are the main adhesion complexes mediating cell adhesion (Carragher and Frame, 2004), we speculate that HIT may be generated at the cell rear margin to mechanically detach FAs during cell migration. Here we analyzed the co-localization of HIT and FAs in keratocytes by fixing keratocytes on an ITS surface and immunostaining vinculin, which marks FAs. Imaging shows that HIT regions indeed share borders with the two large FAs at the two rear flank sites of a keratocyte (Figure 3A). However, despite the large area of the two FAs, only the edges of the FAs coinciding with the cell margin transmit HIT, as shown by the margin analysis of FA, phase contrast, and ITS images in Figure 3B. This result suggests that keratocytes generate HIT on integrin-ligand bonds at the edge of FAs and peel FAs off from the surface to facilitate cell retraction and migration.
Figure 3
HIT Occurs at the Edge of Focal Adhesions (FAs) Coinciding with Cell Rear Margin
(A) Co-imaging of HIT map, phase contrast (PH), and FAs immunostained with vinculin antibody.
(B) Line profiles of HIT, FA, and phase contrast imaging in the rectangular region marked by the yellow dashed line in (A), showing that HIT map, FAs, and the cell margin share a thin border, and only integrins at the edges of FAs coinciding with membrane margin transmit HIT.
(C) Co-imaging of HIT and cellular structures, including FAs, F-actin, and cell membrane, in a CHO-K1 cell. HIT was produced in most FAs underneath cells.
(D) Co-imaging of HIT and cell structures in a keratocyte. HIT was exclusively produced at the cell rear margin.
HIT Occurs at the Edge of Focal Adhesions (FAs) Coinciding with Cell Rear Margin(A) Co-imaging of HIT map, phase contrast (PH), and FAs immunostained with vinculin antibody.(B) Line profiles of HIT, FA, and phase contrast imaging in the rectangular region marked by the yellow dashed line in (A), showing that HIT map, FAs, and the cell margin share a thin border, and only integrins at the edges of FAs coinciding with membrane margin transmit HIT.(C) Co-imaging of HIT and cellular structures, including FAs, F-actin, and cell membrane, in a CHO-K1 cell. HIT was produced in most FAs underneath cells.(D) Co-imaging of HIT and cell structures in a keratocyte. HIT was exclusively produced at the cell rear margin.Next, we examined the co-localization of actomyosin and HIT. Actomyosin is the protein complex of myosin II and F-actin, which is an important force source for cell contractility (Murrell et al., 2015) and fibroblast motility (Even-Ram et al., 2007). Previous studies show that actomyosin produces integrin tensions in FAs in cells with low motility, such as HCC 1143 cells (Jurchenko et al., 2014) and CHO-K1 cells (Wang et al., 2015). Actomyosin is visible by F-actin staining and usually identified as stress fibers in cells. As a control experiment, we co-imaged FAs, stress fibers, and HIT in stationary CHO-K1 cells. The HIT signals are broadly distributed underneath the CHO-K1 cell body, not limited to the cell membrane margin (Figure 3C). The merged images of FA, stress fibers, and ITS signals in Figures 3C and S2 show that each FA is linked to a stress fiber and activates ITS signals under the cell body, suggesting that stress fibers likely generate traction forces on FAs and produce HIT in FAs in CHO-K1 cells, consistent with previous study showing that actomyosin is the force source of HIT in less motile cells (Wang et al., 2015). However, in migrating keratocytes, despite that numerous FAs and stress fibers form in the cell (Figure 3D), none of FAs underneath the cell body generated HIT. The stress fibers have no spatial connection with HIT signals either. HIT is exclusively located on the cell rear margin at the cell trailing edge, suggesting that actomyosin does not correlate with the generation of HIT in migrating keratocytes.
HIT Signal Intensity Correlates Locally with Cell Rear Retraction
To investigate the role of HIT in cell migration, we studied the correlation between real-time HIT signal and membrane rear retraction. Real-time HIT was acquired by subtracting the previous frame from a current frame of an ITS video. This frame subtraction method obtains HIT produced in the latest frame interval and can be approximately treated as real-time HIT signal. Figure 4A shows time-series images of real-time HIT map by frame subtraction method (frame interval: 20s, Video S3). The real-time integrin tension activity is compared with cell membrane retraction intensity (defined as the square of local membrane retraction distance at integrin tension regions) during that frame interval. Membrane retraction is illustrated in the second column of Figure 4A, in which cell contours at the current frame (green) and the previous frame (magenta) were drawn to show the movement of keratocytes. The real-time HIT regions are well sandwiched between the two cell contours at the cell rear. Real-time HIT signal intensity correlates with local membrane retraction intensity with a correlation coefficient of 0.87 (Figure 4B), suggesting that HIT is likely generated to assist cell rear de-adhesion and retraction. Interestingly, real-time HIT intensity per frame has a large variation and exhibits a period of about 2 min in the cell (Figure 4C), reminiscent to the periodic stretching of keratocyte membrane observed in previous studies (Barnhart et al., 2010, Lee et al., 1999).
Figure 4
Correlation between Real-Time HIT Intensity and Cell Membrane Retraction
(A) Time-lapse ITS imaging (Ttol = 54 pN). The second column shows the cell membrane contours in two consecutive imaging frames with a frame interval of 20 s. Green contour is for the cell in current frame, and magenta contour is for the cell in the previous frame. Real-time HIT marked by ITS signal gain (green) was acquired by subtracting the previous frame from a current frame of ITS imaging. Real-time HIT represents the integrin tension signals produced in the latest 20 s. Refer to Video S3.
(B) A scatterplot of the local real-time HIT intensity and the corresponding membrane retraction intensity (defined as the square of local membrane retraction distance at the ITS signal region).
(C) Real-time HIT intensity versus time.
Correlation between Real-Time HIT Intensity and Cell Membrane Retraction(A) Time-lapse ITS imaging (Ttol = 54 pN). The second column shows the cell membrane contours in two consecutive imaging frames with a frame interval of 20 s. Green contour is for the cell in current frame, and magenta contour is for the cell in the previous frame. Real-time HIT marked by ITS signal gain (green) was acquired by subtracting the previous frame from a current frame of ITS imaging. Real-time HIT represents the integrin tension signals produced in the latest 20 s. Refer to Video S3.(B) A scatterplot of the local real-time HIT intensity and the corresponding membrane retraction intensity (defined as the square of local membrane retraction distance at the ITS signal region).(C) Real-time HIT intensity versus time.
Video S3. Real-Time ITS Signal and Cell Membrane Retraction during Keratocyte Migration, Related to Figure 4
Real-time ITS signal was obtained by subtracting the previous frame from a current frame of ITS imaging. The real-time ITS signal reports the integrin tension activity in cells during each frame interval. Cell contours in the two image frames were delineated by MATLAB code (Green: current frame. Magenta: previous frame). The video was recorded with a frame interval of 20 s and played with a frame rate of 6 frames/s.
HIT Was Consistently Generated at the Cell Margin during Acutely Induced Membrane Retraction
During normal keratocyte migration, HIT is generated to peel off rear FAs and facilitate cell retraction. To verify that HIT is consistently required to mediate cell de-adhesion and retraction, here we induced cell retraction at other regions including the cell front using hypertonic medium that acutely reduces cell volume and causes cellular shrinkage (Weyand et al., 1998). In experiments, cell culture medium spiked with 150 mM sucrose was added to migrating keratocytes on a 54-pN ITS surface. Imaging was performed on cells in the next 5 min immediately after the medium exchange. The HIT map is displayed in green and the real-time HIT gained in the latest frame interval (10 s) is in red in Figures 5A and 5B. Within 1 min after medium exchange, irregular cell membrane retraction started to occur in all cell peripheral regions, including the lateral sides and the cell front edge (shown by orange arrows in Figure 5A and Video S4). During the induced cell retraction, HIT signal was consistently and narrowly produced at the cell margin at all retraction sites, including cell front retraction. The real-time HIT signal during the induced cell retraction is typically located at the cell margin with a width less than 0.5 μm (Figure S3), being consistent with the fact that HIT is narrowly generated at the retracting cell margin in normal keratocyte migration.
Figure 5
ITS Signal during Acutely Induced Cell Front Retraction and Biotin-Streptavidin Bond-Mediated Keratocyte Migration, Respectively
(A) Time-series of HIT maps in keratocytes after a treatment with hypertonic medium (cell culture medium spiked with 150 mM sucrose). HIT signal is colored in green, and real-time HIT (HIT gained in the latest 10 s) is colored in red. Hypertonic medium was added at t = 0 s. The induced local cell membrane retraction sites are marked by orange arrows. Refer to Video S4.
(B) Zoom-in images of HIT map and the cell membrane. The width of real-time HIT region is 0.45 μm.
(C) Cell membrane proteins of keratocytes were biotinylated. Keratocytes adhered and migrated by biotin-streptavidin interaction instead of integrin-ligand binding. Molecular tension transmitted by biotin-streptavidin bonds during keratocyte migration was recorded by modified ITS that is conjugated to BSA and immobilized on the surface by physical adsorption.
(D) Time-lapse images of a keratocyte that migrated via biotin-streptavidin bonds. ITS signal was consistently generated at the cell rear margin during this integrin-independent cell migration. Refer to Video S5.
(E) Co-localization analysis of cell margin and tension map indicates that tension transmitted by the biotin-streptavidin bond was still generated at the cell rear margin in the integrin-independent migration. The line profile of map was analyzed on the region marked by the yellow rectangle in (B). Line profile was obtained by averaging the rows of the rectangular region.
ITS Signal during Acutely Induced Cell Front Retraction and Biotin-Streptavidin Bond-Mediated Keratocyte Migration, Respectively(A) Time-series of HIT maps in keratocytes after a treatment with hypertonic medium (cell culture medium spiked with 150 mM sucrose). HIT signal is colored in green, and real-time HIT (HIT gained in the latest 10 s) is colored in red. Hypertonic medium was added at t = 0 s. The induced local cell membrane retraction sites are marked by orange arrows. Refer to Video S4.(B) Zoom-in images of HIT map and the cell membrane. The width of real-time HIT region is 0.45 μm.(C) Cell membrane proteins of keratocytes were biotinylated. Keratocytes adhered and migrated by biotin-streptavidin interaction instead of integrin-ligand binding. Molecular tension transmitted by biotin-streptavidin bonds during keratocyte migration was recorded by modified ITS that is conjugated to BSA and immobilized on the surface by physical adsorption.(D) Time-lapse images of a keratocyte that migrated via biotin-streptavidin bonds. ITS signal was consistently generated at the cell rear margin during this integrin-independent cell migration. Refer to Video S5.(E) Co-localization analysis of cell margin and tension map indicates that tension transmitted by the biotin-streptavidin bond was still generated at the cell rear margin in the integrin-independent migration. The line profile of map was analyzed on the region marked by the yellow rectangle in (B). Line profile was obtained by averaging the rows of the rectangular region.
Video S4. HIT Was Mapped in a Keratocyte under the Treatment of Hypertonic Medium, Related to Figure 5
Cell culture medium spiked with 150 mM sucrose was added to cells at t = 0 s. The video was recorded with a frame interval of 10 s and played with a frame rate of 3 frames/s.
ITS Signal Was Generated at Cell Rear Margin in Biotinylated Keratocytes That Migrate via Biotin-Streptavidin Bonds
We further investigate whether HIT is a general approach for cell de-adhesion and retraction in migrating keratocytes. An experiment was designed to test integrin-independent keratocyte migration. We biotinylated membrane proteins of keratocytes and tested keratocyte migration based on biotin-streptavidin-mediated adhesion instead of integrin-mediated adhesion. Keratocytes re-suspended in serum-free medium were treated with NHS ester-labeled biotin. The NHS ester readily reacts with amine group in the membrane proteins of keratocytes and covalently labels the proteins with biotins. The biotinylated keratocytes are able to adhere on streptavidin surfaces without integrin ligands. A new construct of ITS (Figure 5C) was designed to map the tension transmitted by biotin-streptavidin bonds. The ITS was covalently conjugated with BSA, which enables ITS surface immobilization by physical adsorption. The other end of the ITS has a biotin tag to immobilize streptavidin. Biotinylated keratocytes were plated on the ITS-coupled streptavidin surfaces. The keratocytes were shown to adhere and migrate normally on the surface. ITS signal was also generated by the migrating keratocytes on the surface (Figure 5D and Video S5). Instead of the typical two-track force map due to the peeling of the large FAs at two sides in regular keratocytes, biotinylated keratocytes generated nearly homogeneous ITS signal behind the cells. This is likely because the membrane proteins are relatively uniformly distributed on the cell membrane and biotin-streptavidin interaction occurs evenly under the cells. Remarkably, the ITS signal transmitted by the biotin-streptavidin bonds is still exclusively generated at the cell rear margin (Figure 5E), demonstrating that keratocytes have the ability to concentrate force at cell rear to mechanically peel off rear adhesion sites and facilitate cell migration even in an integrin-independent manner.
Video S5. HIT Was Mapped in a Biotinylated Keratocyte Migrating on Streptavidin-Coupled ITS surface (Ttol = 54 pN), Related to Figure 5
A biotinylated keratocyte is migrating on ITS-coupled streptavidin surface. The video was recorded with a frame interval of 20 s and played with a frame rate of 4 frames/s.
Discussion
By calibrating and mapping integrin molecular tension in migrating keratocytes at submicron resolution, we provided direct evidence to show that keratocytes mechanically mediate cell rear de-adhesion during rapid migration. We found that keratocytes produce HIT capable of rupturing integrin-ligand bonds exclusively and narrowly at the cell rear margin. HIT mediates rear de-adhesion by peeling off FAs lagging behind during cell migration. The intensity of local HIT is highly correlated with cell retraction dynamics, showing that HIT promotes cell rear retraction and facilitates cell migration. HIT is also generated at the cell margin during artificially induced cell front retraction and during keratocyte migration mediated by actin-streptavidin bonds, suggesting that concentrating HIT at the cell margin is a general mechanism to mediate de-adhesion and retraction during keratocyte migration.The narrow and exclusive localization of HIT at the cell margin raises the question of what is the direct force source of HIT because integrins are located in the cell membrane and linked to actin-based cytoskeleton. Cell membrane and cytoskeleton are the two potential physical sources for HIT. Actomyosin has been generally considered to be the main source of cell traction force produced at the cell-matrix interface (Lauffenburger and Horwitz, 1996, Ridley et al., 2003). However, it is doubtful that actomyosin is the direct force source for HIT that mediates keratocyte retraction. First, it is known that actomyosin is dispensable in keratocyte migration, as the pharmaceutical inhibition of actomyosin function does not prohibit keratocytes from migrating (Wilson et al., 2010). Moreover, if actomyosin generates HIT in migrating keratocytes, it is puzzling how actomyosin contraction may exclusively concentrate HIT at the cell rear margin within a narrow region of submicron width. A more plausible mechanism is that cell membrane instead of actomyosin generates HIT in rapidly migrating keratocytes. According to the actin treadmilling model (Le Clainche and Carlier, 2008, Theriot and Mitchison, 1991), polymerizing actin network in cell protrusion site pushes the cell membrane forward, therefore stretching the cell membrane and producing a pulling force at the cell trailing edge (Lieber et al., 2013). HIT is likely generated on cell rear adhesion sites by tensioned cell membrane. This would explain why HIT is concentrated in a narrow region and consistently produced at the cell rear margin. This hypothesis is also favorably supported by the experiments of acute membrane retraction induced by osmotic shock during which HIT was generated at the cell margin in all peripheral locations, including the cell front, as the osmotic shock acutely induces membrane retraction but unlikely has an immediate effect on actomyosin force alteration. The biotin-streptavidin-based keratocyte migration also favorably supports the hypothesis that the cell membrane is the force source of HIT. It was shown that biotinylated keratocytes were able to adhere and migrate on streptavidin-presenting surface via biotin-streptavidin bonds. ITS signal reporting high-level tension was still generated at the cell rear margin in this integrin-independent keratocyte migration. Because actomyosin is not physically linked with most membrane proteins, the ITS signal was more likely generated by the cell membrane.Nonetheless, it is challenging to rigorously rule out the role of actomyosin in the generation of HIT. We attempted to pharmaceutically inhibit myosin II in keratocytes using blebbistatin and indeed observed that HIT signal gradually diminished (Figures S4A and S4B). However, this does not suggest that actomyosin is the direct source of HIT. Because blebbistatin has the side effect of abolishing FA formation (Figure S4C) and weakening cell adhesion (Jurado et al., 2005), the decrease of HIT could simply be caused by the FA abolishment as HIT is generated to peel off FAs. In the future, an approach that inhibits myosin II while preserving FA formation is desired to confirm that actomyosin is not involved in HIT generation in migrating keratocytes.Overall, our results provide the solid evidence that fast migrating keratocytes mechanically mediate cell rear de-adhesion by concentrating HIT exclusively at the cell rear margin to rupture the integrin-ligand bonds, testifying that mechanical regulation plays an important role in rapid cell migration.
Limitations of the Study
This study was based on keratocytes as the cell models. Keratocytes are one rare type of cells that migrate rapidly at a rate comparable with that of neutrophils but still form strong FA sites. This study revealed the biomechanical mechanism that keratocytes concentrate HIT to efficiently detach the FAs during rapid migration. However, most other migratory metazoan cells migrate at much lower rates, typically 1%–10% of the rate of keratocytes. The conclusion drawn in this manuscript based on keratocytes may not be applicable to those cells with lower motility. The mechanism for cell de-adhesion in more common migratory cells awaits further investigation.
Methods
All methods can be found in the accompanying Transparent Methods supplemental file.
Authors: Sharona Even-Ram; Andrew D Doyle; Mary Anne Conti; Kazue Matsumoto; Robert S Adelstein; Kenneth M Yamada Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2007-02-18 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: Vishnu V Undyala; Micah Dembo; Katherine Cembrola; Benjamin J Perrin; Anna Huttenlocher; John S Elce; Peter A Greer; Yu-Li Wang; Karen A Beningo Journal: J Cell Sci Date: 2008-10-07 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: M Poujade; E Grasland-Mongrain; A Hertzog; J Jouanneau; P Chavrier; B Ladoux; A Buguin; P Silberzan Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-09-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Cyrus A Wilson; Mark A Tsuchida; Greg M Allen; Erin L Barnhart; Kathryn T Applegate; Patricia T Yam; Lin Ji; Kinneret Keren; Gaudenz Danuser; Julie A Theriot Journal: Nature Date: 2010-05-20 Impact factor: 49.962