| Literature DB >> 30470816 |
Javier Sánchez-Sánchez1, David Bishop2,3, Jorge García-Unanue4, Esther Ubago-Guisado5, Enrique Hernando5, Jorge López-Fernández5, Enrique Colino5, Leonor Gallardo5.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a repeated sprint ability (RSA) test on the contractile properties of the muscles in elite futsal players. A total of 20 elite players completed the RSA test (7 × 30 m), and the contractile response from the rectus femoris (RF) and biceps femoris (BF) of both legs were analysed pre and post through tensiomyography. There was a significant increment in 30-m times from the third sprint onwards (p < 0.05). The percent decrement in sprint ability (RSADEC) with respect to the first sprint was significantly higher in the last sprint. The players did not show evidence of lateral asymmetry in any of the muscle groups analysed after the RSA test (p > 0.05). Following the RSA test there was a significant reduction in the delay time (Td) in RF, a significant decrement in half-relaxation time (Tr) in the RF, and a significant reduction in sustain time (Ts) in the RF and BF of both legs. The maximum radial displacement of the muscle belly (Dm) increased (1.6 mm; effect size = 0.75; p < 0.05) in the RF after the RSA test, indicating reduced muscle stiffness and the ability to generate strength rapidly. The decrement in performance during the RSA test was significantly correlated with changes in contraction time (Tc) in RF and BF, Td in BF, and Dm in RF (p < 0.05). The RSA test generated alterations in the contractile properties of the RF and BF in elite players. However, futsal players did not present asymmetries in any muscular parameters. The baseline contractile muscle parameters could be an important factor related to performance of players during repeated high-intensity actions.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30470816 PMCID: PMC6251873 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35345-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1An example of how the TMG parameters were calculated (Carrasco et al.[15]). Td: delay time; Tc: contraction time; Ts: sustain time; Dm: maximum radial displacement of muscle belly; Tr: half-relaxation time.
Figure 25-m (A) and 30-m (B) time and performance deterioration profile; RSADEC (C) and RSACHANGE (D) for the RSA test (7 × 30 m). RSACHANGE: ((worst time − best time)/best time) * 100). RSADEC: ((total sprint time − best time * 7)/best time * 7) * 100). *p < 0.05; p < 0.01; ***p < 0.0015; significantly different from the 1st sprint for 30-m times; and significantly different from the 7th sprint for RSADEC and RSACHANGE (n = 20). Data are presented as mean and SD.
Results of the tensiomyography before (pre) and after (post) the RSA test for both the dominant and non-dominant leg.
| Dominant | Non-dominant | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |
|
| ||||
| Td (ms) | 23.9 ± 2.2* | 22.8 ± 1.4 | 23.4 ± 1.8* | 22.2 ± 1.6 |
| Tc (ms) | 31 ± 8.4 | 27.6 ± 3.8 | 28.3 ± 6.1 | 26 ± 4.8 |
| Ts (ms) | 125 ± 53.4* | 72 ± 33.2 | 120.8 ± 60.4* | 75.5 ± 33.8 |
| Tr (ms) | 61.6 ± 40.4* | 34.1 ± 31.9 | 66.3 ± 47.6* | 34.1 ± 29.3 |
| Dm (mm) | 6.9 ± 2.5* | 8.4 ± 1.7 | 7.4 ± 3 | 7.7 ± 2.5 |
|
| ||||
| Td (ms) | 23.2 ± 1.6 | 22.7 ± 1.6 | 22.4 ± 1.9 | 22.3 ± 1.7 |
| Tc (ms) | 26.3 ± 5.9 | 28.6 ± 11.6 | 30.6 ± 14.6 | 29.5 ± 13.3 |
| Ts (ms) | 205.5 ± 44.3* | 146.6 ± 17.6 | 213.2 ± 73.1* | 159.6 ± 56.3 |
| Tr (ms) | 60.4 ± 42.6 | 45.8 ± 27.7 | 65.1 ± 37.9 | 52.2 ± 46.2 |
| Dm (mm) | 5.8 ± 2.1 | 5.8 ± 2.1 | 5.6 ± 2.8 | 5.2 ± 2.5 |
*Significantly different from post (p < 0.05); Td = delay time, Tc = contraction time, Ts = sustain time; Tr = half-relaxation time; Dm = maximum radial displacement of muscle belly; RF = rectus femoris; BF = biceps femoris. n = 20 for all parameters.
Correlation coefficients for the baseline values of the tensiomyography in the BF and the total time (RSATT), the best sprint time (RSABEST), the mean time (RSAMEAN), the percent sprint decrement (RSADEC), and the percent difference from best to worst sprint (RSACHANGE) during the RSA test.
| RSATT | RSABEST | RSAMEAN | RSADEC | RSACHANGE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Td (BFpre) | 0.032 | −0.175 | −0.007 | 0.487* | 0.591** |
| Tc (BFpre) | 0.254 | −0.131 | 0.009 | 0.391 | 0.242 |
| Ts (BFpre) | 0.334 | 0.476* | 0.528* | −0.202 | −0.050 |
| Tr (BFpre) | 0.191 | −0.111 | −0.038 | 0.226 | 0.321 |
| Dm (BFpre) | 0.297 | 0.038 | 0.007 | −0.105 | −0.263 |
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; Dm = maximum radial displacement of muscle belly; Tc = contraction time, Td = delay time, Ts = sustain time; Tr = half-relaxation time; BF = biceps femoris (n = 20).
Correlation coefficients between the RSADEC and RSACHANGE derived from the RSA test and the percentage change in the TMG parameters from pre to post the RSA test for the RF and BF.
| RF | RSADEC | RSACHANGE | BF | RSADEC | RSACHANGE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TdCHANGE | −0.197 | −0.043 | TdCHANGE | 0.477* | 0.578** |
| TcCHANGE | −0.498* | −0.263 | TcCHANGE | 0.497* | 0.469* |
| TsCHANGE | −0.186 | −0.217 | TsCHANGE | −0.337 | −0.318 |
| TrCHANGE | −0.158 | −0.232 | TrCHANGE | −0.015 | 0.116 |
| DmCHANGE | −0.424 | −0.485* | DmCHANGE | 0.184 | 0.018 |
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; Dm = maximum radial displacement of muscle belly; Tc = contraction time, Td = delay time, Ts = sustain time; Tr = half-relaxation time; RF = rectus femoris; BF = biceps femoris. n = 20.