| Literature DB >> 30470207 |
Sulaiya Husaiyin1, Lili Han2, Lin Wang2, Chunhua Ma2, Zumurelaiti Ainiwaer2, Nuermanguli Rouzi2, Mireguli Akemujiang2, Hatiguli Simayil2, Zumulaiti Aniwa2, Rouzi Nurimanguli2, Mayinuer Niyazi2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is the most common genital malignant tumor in women worldwide. However, the reliability of different detection methods may vary according to populations and epidemics. This study analyzed factors relevant to high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection among rural Uyghur women aged > 30 years and evaluated the value of different screening methods for cervical precancerous lesions.Entities:
Keywords: Cervical cancer; Cervical epithelial lesion; Colposcopy; Human papillomavirus infection; Uyghur
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30470207 PMCID: PMC6260850 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-5083-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Fig. 1Flow chart of the experiments
Characteristics of the 225 rural Uyghur women included in the study
| Items | Percentage (%) | Items | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | Age at first marriage | ||
|
| 79 (35.1) |
| 65 (28.9) |
|
| 110 (48.9) |
| 113 (50.2) |
|
| 36 (16.0) |
| 47 (20.9) |
| Education | Number of times married | ||
|
| 153 (68.0) |
| 129(57.3) |
|
| 66 (29.3) |
| 74 (32.9) |
|
| 6 (2.7) |
| 22 (9.8) |
| Annual household income | Number of pregnancies | ||
|
| 71 (31.6) |
| 40 (17.8) |
|
| 76 (33.8) |
| 87 (38.7) |
|
| 78 (34.7) |
| 98 (43.6) |
| Marital status | Number of sexual partners in the past 5 years | ||
|
| 212 (94.2) |
| 199 (88.4) |
|
| 2(0.9) |
| 15 (6.7) |
|
| 5 (2.2) |
| 11 (4.9) |
|
| 6 (2.7) | Age of menarche | |
| Menopause (%) | 71/225 (31.6) |
| 18 (8.0) |
| Family history of cervical cancer | 10/225 (4.4) |
| 167 (74.2) |
|
| 40 (17.8) |
Comparison of results among HPV testing, colposcopy and histopathology
| Screening test | Results | CIN | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| + | – | |||
| HPV | + | 1 | 20 | 21 |
| – | 3 | 201 | 204 | |
| Colposcopy | + | 4 | 4 | 8 |
| – | 0 | 217 | 217 | |
| Total | 4 | 221 | 225 |
Fig. 2ROC analysis of the HPV test and colposcopy results
ROC analysis of HPV test and colposcopy results (biopsy results were used as the gold standard)
| Tests | Area under the curve | |
|---|---|---|
| HPV test | 0.538 (0.292, 0.784) | 0.753 |
| Colposcopy | 0.995 (0.988, 1.003) | < 0.001 |
Comparison of results between the HPV test and colposcopy
| HPV test results | Colposcopy | χ2 value | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | CIN | |||
| Negative | 197 | 7 | 5.333 | 0.021 |
| Positive | 20 | 1 | ||
Based on paired χ2 test
Analysis of factors relevant to HPV infection
| Items | Multivariate analysis of HPV infection | |
|---|---|---|
| OR (95.0% CI) | P | |
| Marital status | ||
|
| 1 | |
|
| 13.092 (0.676, 253.422) | 0.089 |
|
| 7.545 (0.904, 63.006) | 0.062 |
|
| 13.601 (2.170, 85.263) | 0.005 |
| Number of sexual partners in the past 5 years | ||
|
| 1 | |
|
| 2.137 (0.365, 12.503) | 0.400 |
|
| 16.808 (4.148, 68.101) | < 0.001 |