Literature DB >> 25124771

Are 20 human papillomavirus types causing cervical cancer?

Marc Arbyn1, Massimo Tommasino, Christophe Depuydt, Joakim Dillner.   

Abstract

In 2012, the International Agency for Research on Cancer concluded that there was consistent and sufficient epidemiological, experimental and mechanistic evidence of carcinogenicity to humans for 12 HPV types (HPV16, HPV18, HPV31, HPV33, HPV35, HPV39, HPV45, HPV51, HPV52, HPV56, HPV58 and HPV59) for cervical cancer. Therefore, these types were considered as 1A carcinogens. They all belong to the family of the α-Papillomaviridae, in particular to the species α5 (HPV51), α6 (HPV56), α7 (HPV18, HPV39, HPV45, HPV59) and α9 (HPV16, HPV31, HPV33, HPV35, HPV52, HPV58). Less evidence is available for a thirteenth type (HPV68, α7), which is classified as a 2A carcinogen (probably carcinogenic). Moreover, seven other phylogenetically related types (HPV26, HPV53, HPV66, HPV67, HPV68, HPV70 and HPV73) were identified as single HPV infections in certain rare cases of cervical cancer and were considered possibly carcinogenic (2B carcinogens). Recently, Halec et al [7] demonstrated that the molecular signature of HPV-induced carcinogenesis (presence of type-specific spliced E6*| mRNA; increased expression of p16; and decreased expression of cyclin D1, p53 and Rb) was similar in cervical cancers containing single infections with one of the eight afore-mentioned 2A or 2B carcinogens to those in cancers with single infections with group 1 carcinogens. Ninety six percent of cervical cancers are attributable to one of the 13 most common HPV types (groups 1 and 2A). Including the additional seven HPV types (group 2B) added 2.6%, to reach a total of 98.7% of all HPV-positive cervical cancers. From recently updated meta-analyses, it was shown that HPV68, HPV26, HPV66, HPV67, HPV73 and HPV82 were significantly more common in cancer cases than in women with normal cervical cytology, suggesting that for these HPV types, an upgrading of the carcinogen classification could be considered. However, there is no need to include them in HPV screening tests or vaccines, given their rarity in cervical cancers.
Copyright © 2014 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; carcinogenesis; cervical cancer; human papillomavirus

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25124771     DOI: 10.1002/path.4424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  75 in total

Review 1.  Human Papillomavirus Laboratory Testing: the Changing Paradigm.

Authors:  Eileen M Burd
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Evaluating the Utility and Prevalence of HPV Biomarkers in Oral Rinses and Serology for HPV-related Oropharyngeal Cancer.

Authors:  Gypsyamber D'Souza; Gwendolyn Clemens; Tanya Troy; Rachel G Castillo; Linda Struijk; Tim Waterboer; Noemi Bender; Phillip M Pierorazio; Simon R Best; Howard Strickler; Dorothy J Wiley; Robert I Haddad; Marshall Posner; Carole Fakhry
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2019-08-16

3.  HPV-based cervical cancer screening- facts, fiction, and misperceptions.

Authors:  Nicolas Wentzensen; Marc Arbyn
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Within-Host Variations of Human Papillomavirus Reveal APOBEC Signature Mutagenesis in the Viral Genome.

Authors:  Yusuke Hirose; Mamiko Onuki; Yuri Tenjimbayashi; Seiichiro Mori; Yoshiyuki Ishii; Takamasa Takeuchi; Nobutaka Tasaka; Toyomi Satoh; Tohru Morisada; Takashi Iwata; Shingo Miyamoto; Koji Matsumoto; Akihiko Sekizawa; Iwao Kukimoto
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Genetic variability of human papillomavirus type 66 L1 gene among women presenting for cervical cancer screening in Chile.

Authors:  Monserrat Balanda; Jorge Fernández; Nicolás Vergara; Constanza Campano; Loredana Arata; Héctor San Martín; Eugenio Ramírez
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Displaying 31RG-1 peptide on the surface of HPV16 L1 by use of a human papillomavirus chimeric virus-like particle induces cross-neutralizing antibody responses in mice.

Authors:  Xue Chen; Ting Zhang; Hongyang Liu; Yaru Hao; Guoyang Liao; Xuemei Xu
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Temporal changes in the cervical cancer burden in Bulgaria: Implications for eastern european countries going through transition.

Authors:  Kaeli K Samson; Gleb Haynatzki; Amr S Soliman; Zdravka Valerianova
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Proteomic Analysis of Normal and Cancer Cervical Cell Lines Reveals Deregulation of Cytoskeleton-associated Proteins.

Authors:  Kalliopi I Pappa; Vasiliki Lygirou; Georgia Kontostathi; Jerome Zoidakis; Manousos Makridakis; Konstantinos Vougas; George Daskalakis; Alexander Polyzos; Nicholas P Anagnou
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.069

9.  Head-to-Head Comparison of the RNA-Based Aptima Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Assay and the DNA-Based Hybrid Capture 2 HPV Test in a Routine Screening Population of Women Aged 30 to 60 Years in Germany.

Authors:  Thomas Iftner; Sven Becker; Klaus-Joachim Neis; Alejandra Castanon; Angelika Iftner; Barbara Holz; Annette Staebler; Melanie Henes; Katharina Rall; Juliane Haedicke; Claus Hann von Weyhern; Andreas Clad; Sara Brucker; Peter Sasieni
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Clinical and Analytical Performance of the Onclarity HPV Assay Using the VALGENT Framework.

Authors:  K Cuschieri; D T Geraets; C Moore; W Quint; E Duvall; M Arbyn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.