Literature DB >> 30468960

Human-mediated dispersal of terrestrial species between Antarctic biogeographic regions: A preliminary risk assessment.

Kevin A Hughes1, Peter Convey2, Luis R Pertierra3, Greta C Vega4, Pedro Aragón3, Miguel Á Olalla-Tárraga4.   

Abstract

The distribution of terrestrial biodiversity within Antarctica is complex, with 16 distinct biogeographic regions (Antarctic Conservation Biogeographic Regions) currently recognised within the Antarctic continent, Peninsula and Scotia Arc archipelagos of the Antarctic Treaty area. Much of this diversity is endemic not only to Antarctica as a whole, but to specific regions within it. Further complexity is added by inclusion of the biodiversity found on the islands located in the Southern Ocean north of the Treaty area. Within Antarctica, scientific, logistic and tourism activities may inadvertently move organisms over potentially long distances, far beyond natural dispersal ranges. Such translocation can disrupt natural species distribution patterns and biogeography through: (1) movement of spatially restricted indigenous species to other areas of Antarctica; (2) movement of distinct populations of more generally distributed species from one area of Antarctica to another, leading to genetic homogenisation and loss of assumed local patterns of adaptation; and (3) further dispersal of introduced non-native species from one area of Antarctica to another. Species can be moved between regions in association with people and cargo, by ship, aircraft and overland travel. Movement of cargo and personnel by ship between stations located in different biogeographic regions is likely to present one of the greatest risks, particularly as coastal stations may experience similar climatic conditions, making establishment more likely. Recognising that reducing the risk of inter-regional transfer of species is a priority issue for the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting, we make practical recommendations aimed at reducing this risk, including the implementation of appropriate biosecurity procedures.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological homogenisation; Conservation; Genetic homogenisation; Human footprint; Inter-regional transfer; Non-native

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30468960     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  8 in total

1.  Antarctica's wilderness fails to capture continent's biodiversity.

Authors:  Rachel I Leihy; Bernard W T Coetzee; Fraser Morgan; Ben Raymond; Justine D Shaw; Aleks Terauds; Kees Bastmeijer; Steven L Chown
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Host-Associated Phages Disperse across the Extraterrestrial Analogue Antarctica.

Authors:  Janina Rahlff; Till L V Bornemann; Anna Lopatina; Konstantin Severinov; Alexander J Probst
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 5.005

3.  International Response under the Antarctic Treaty System to the Establishment of A Non-native Fly in Antarctica.

Authors:  Mónica Remedios-De León; Kevin Andrew Hughes; Enrique Morelli; Peter Convey
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Invasive non-native species likely to threaten biodiversity and ecosystems in the Antarctic Peninsula region.

Authors:  Kevin A Hughes; Oliver L Pescott; Jodey Peyton; Tim Adriaens; Elizabeth J Cottier-Cook; Gillian Key; Wolfgang Rabitsch; Elena Tricarico; David K A Barnes; Naomi Baxter; Mark Belchier; Denise Blake; Peter Convey; Wayne Dawson; Danielle Frohlich; Lauren M Gardiner; Pablo González-Moreno; Ross James; Christopher Malumphy; Stephanie Martin; Angeliki F Martinou; Dan Minchin; Andrea Monaco; Niall Moore; Simon A Morley; Katherine Ross; Jonathan Shanklin; Katharine Turvey; David Vaughan; Alexander G C Vaux; Victoria Werenkraut; Ian J Winfield; Helen E Roy
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 10.863

5.  Cryptic diversity in smooth-shelled mussels on Southern Ocean islands: connectivity, hybridisation and a marine invasion.

Authors:  Małgorzata Zbawicka; Jonathan P A Gardner; Roman Wenne
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 6.  Antarctic environmental change and biological responses.

Authors:  Peter Convey; Lloyd S Peck
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  Assessing distribution shifts and ecophysiological characteristics of the only Antarctic winged midge under climate change scenarios.

Authors:  Tamara Contador; Melisa Gañan; Gustavo Bizama; Guillermo Fuentes-Jaque; Luis Morales; Javier Rendoll; Felipe Simoes; James Kennedy; Ricardo Rozzi; Peter Convey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Islands in the ice: Potential impacts of habitat transformation on Antarctic biodiversity.

Authors:  Jasmine R Lee; Melinda J Waterman; Justine D Shaw; Dana M Bergstrom; Heather J Lynch; Diana H Wall; Sharon A Robinson
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-07-24       Impact factor: 13.211

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.