A M Drucker1,2,3, E Cho3,4,5, W-Q Li3,4, C A Camargo5,6,7, T Li3,5, A A Qureshi3,4,5,8. 1. Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 2. Women's College Research Institute and Department of Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. 3. Department of Dermatology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. 4. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. 5. Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 6. Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 7. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. 8. Department of Dermatology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies of atopic dermatitis (AD) are often limited by case definitions that have not been validated. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we assessed the accuracy of self-report of AD in a large cohort of US female nurses, the Nurses' Health Study 2 (NHS2). We also provide clinical characteristics of AD in the cohort. METHODS: We sent an electronic questionnaire to NHS2 participants who previously reported ever having a diagnosis of AD. This questionnaire was designed to confirm cases of AD using previously validated algorithms with >85% specificity. We assessed the association of AD with asthma, comparing the results when different definitions of AD were applied. We also inquired about various aspects of participants' AD. RESULTS: Responses were received from 2509 of 5126 (49%) nurses who were sent the questionnaire, with an average age of 62. Most participants (1996/2509, 80%) reiterated their previously reported clinician diagnosis of AD. Application of the two diagnostic algorithms yielded confirmation of 1538 and 1293 prevalent cases, respectively. The association of AD with asthma was stronger when more stringent AD case definitions were applied. Participants generally reported mild disease (92% with ≤10% maximal body surface area involved) and a high proportion (57%) reported adult-onset disease. CONCLUSIONS: Self-report of AD diagnosis has good reliability, and future analyses will be strengthened by our ability to conduct sensitivity analyses with refined confirmed AD subgroups.
BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies of atopic dermatitis (AD) are often limited by case definitions that have not been validated. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we assessed the accuracy of self-report of AD in a large cohort of US female nurses, the Nurses' Health Study 2 (NHS2). We also provide clinical characteristics of AD in the cohort. METHODS: We sent an electronic questionnaire to NHS2participants who previously reported ever having a diagnosis of AD. This questionnaire was designed to confirm cases of AD using previously validated algorithms with >85% specificity. We assessed the association of AD with asthma, comparing the results when different definitions of AD were applied. We also inquired about various aspects of participants' AD. RESULTS: Responses were received from 2509 of 5126 (49%) nurses who were sent the questionnaire, with an average age of 62. Most participants (1996/2509, 80%) reiterated their previously reported clinician diagnosis of AD. Application of the two diagnostic algorithms yielded confirmation of 1538 and 1293 prevalent cases, respectively. The association of AD with asthma was stronger when more stringent AD case definitions were applied. Participants generally reported mild disease (92% with ≤10% maximal body surface area involved) and a high proportion (57%) reported adult-onset disease. CONCLUSIONS: Self-report of AD diagnosis has good reliability, and future analyses will be strengthened by our ability to conduct sensitivity analyses with refined confirmed AD subgroups.
Authors: Katrina Abuabara; Ole Hoffstad; Andrea Troxel; Joel M Gelfand; David J Margolis Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: E Giovannucci; G Colditz; M J Stampfer; E B Rimm; L Litin; L Sampson; W C Willett Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1991-04-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Jonathan I Silverberg; Nitin K Garg; Amy S Paller; Anna B Fishbein; Phyllis C Zee Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2014-08-31 Impact factor: 8.551
Authors: Alanna C Bridgman; Abrar A Qureshi; Tricia Li; Fred K Tabung; Eunyoung Cho; Aaron M Drucker Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Deanna E Morra; Eunyoung Cho; Tricia Li; Carlos A Camargo; Abrar A Qureshi; Aaron M Drucker Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2020-07-23 Impact factor: 11.527