Literature DB >> 30467214

Does Phase-Contrast Imaging through the Cerebral Aqueduct Predict the Outcome of Lumbar CSF Drainage or Shunt Surgery in Patients with Suspected Adult Hydrocephalus?

A M Blitz1, J Shin2, O Balédent3, G Pagé3, L W Bonham2, D A Herzka4, A R Moghekar5, D Rigamonti6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Radiologic imaging plays a key role in diagnosing chronic adult hydrocephalus, but its role in predicting prognosis is still controversial. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of cardiac-gated phase-contrast MR imaging through the cerebral aqueduct in predicting the clinical response to diagnostic lumbar puncture/lumbar drainage and shunt surgery in suspected adult hydrocephalus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, the phase-contrast MR imaging of 185 patients with suspected chronic adult hydrocephalus was evaluated using the CSF Flow software package. Decision-making for shunt placement was performed in this cohort on the basis of clinical assessment alone without the availability of quantitative phase-contrast MR imaging results. We recorded the response to lumbar puncture or lumbar drainage and shunt surgery using quantitative tests such as the Tinetti Test, the Timed Up and Go, and the Mini-Mental State Examination and qualitative measures of gait, urinary, and cognitive symptom improvement before and after lumbar puncture/lumbar drainage and shunt surgery. Quantitative analysis of phase-contrast MR imaging was compared with clinical outcome measures.
RESULTS: Both CSF stroke volume and flow rate overlapped between lumbar puncture/lumbar drainage responders and nonresponders. There was also a significant overlap between shunt responders and nonresponders. Aqueductal stroke volume or flow rate alone was a poor predictor of lumbar puncture/lumbar drainage and shunt surgery response. Quantitative clinical measures after lumbar puncture/lumbar drainage were better predictors of shunt response.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the results of phase-contrast MR imaging through the cerebral aqueduct alone should not be used to select patients for diagnostic or therapeutic CSF diversion.
© 2018 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30467214      PMCID: PMC7655420          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  26 in total

1.  Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging studies of older adults: a shrinking brain.

Authors:  Susan M Resnick; Dzung L Pham; Michael A Kraut; Alan B Zonderman; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Natural course of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Kerstin Andrén; Carsten Wikkelsø; Magnus Tisell; Per Hellström
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  The European iNPH Multicentre Study on the predictive values of resistance to CSF outflow and the CSF Tap Test in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Carsten Wikkelsø; Per Hellström; Petra Margarete Klinge; Jos Th J Tans
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Timing of surgical treatment for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: association between treatment delay and reduced short-term benefit.

Authors:  Sharif Vakili; Dane Moran; Alice Hung; Benjamin D Elder; Lee Jeon; Hugo Fialho; Eric W Sankey; Ignacio Jusué-Torres; C Rory Goodwin; Jennifer Lu; Jamie Robison; Daniele Rigamonti
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.047

5.  Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and relation with blood flow: a magnetic resonance study with semiautomated cerebrospinal fluid segmentation.

Authors:  O Balédent; M C Henry-Feugeas; I Idy-Peretti
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Long-term outcome in patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Babar Kahlon; Johan Sjunnesson; Stig Rehncrona
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  The role of cerebrospinal fluid flow study using phase contrast MR imaging in diagnosing idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  F T Al-Zain; G Rademacher; U Meier; S Mutze; J Lemcke
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2008

8.  Changes in aqueductal CSF stroke volume and progression of symptoms in patients with unshunted idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  A Scollato; R Tenenbaum; G Bahl; M Celerini; B Salani; N Di Lorenzo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements at MR imaging.

Authors:  W G Bradley; D Scalzo; J Queralt; W N Nitz; D J Atkinson; P Wong
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Relationship between ventricular morphology and aqueductal cerebrospinal fluid flow in healthy and communicating hydrocephalus.

Authors:  William W Chiang; Christos G Takoudis; Sang H Lee; Annette Weis-McNulty; Roberta Glick; Noam Alperin
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.016

View more
  7 in total

1.  Decreased Craniocervical CSF Flow in Patients with Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  S M Stöcklein; M Brandlhuber; S S Lause; A Pomschar; K Jahn; R Schniepp; N Alperin; B Ertl-Wagner
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Transmantle Pressure Computed from MR Imaging Measurements of Aqueduct Flow and Dimensions.

Authors:  S J Sincomb; W Coenen; E Criado-Hidalgo; K Wei; K King; M Borzage; V Haughton; A L Sánchez; J C Lasheras
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 4.966

3.  In vitro and numerical simulation of blood removal from cerebrospinal fluid: comparison of lumbar drain to Neurapheresis therapy.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Khani; Lucas R Sass; M Keith Sharp; Aaron R McCabe; Laura M Zitella Verbick; Shivanand P Lad; Bryn A Martin
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2020-03-16

4.  In vitro evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid velocity measurement in type I Chiari malformation: repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement using 2D phase contrast and 4D flow MRI.

Authors:  Gwendolyn Williams; Suraj Thyagaraj; Audrey Fu; John Oshinski; Daniel Giese; Alexander C Bunck; Eleonora Fornari; Francesco Santini; Mark Luciano; Francis Loth; Bryn A Martin
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2021-03-18

5.  Are preoperative phase-contrast CSF flow parameters ideal for predicting the outcome of shunt surgery in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus?

Authors:  Wen-Jie He; Xie-Jun Zhang; Qi-Zhong Xu; Run-Tao Bai; Jia-Kuan Chen; Xi Zhou; Jun Xia
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 4.086

6.  Quantification of Oscillatory Shear Stress from Reciprocating CSF Motion on 4D Flow Imaging.

Authors:  S Yamada; H Ito; M Ishikawa; K Yamamoto; M Yamaguchi; M Oshima; K Nozaki
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus and Elderly Acquired Hydrocephalus: Evaluation With Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow and Ventricular Volume Parameters.

Authors:  Wen-Jie He; Xi Zhou; Jia Long; Qi-Zhong Xu; Xian-Jian Huang; Jun Jiang; Jun Xia; Guang Yang
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 5.750

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.