Literature DB >> 30466151

Impact of microvascular invasion on clinical outcomes after curative-intent resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Liang-Shuo Hu1, Matthew Weiss2, Irinel Popescu3, Hugo P Marques4, Luca Aldrighetti5, Shishir K Maithel6, Carlo Pulitano7, Todd W Bauer8, Feng Shen9, George A Poultsides10, Oliver Soubrane11, Guillaume Martel12, B Groot Koerkamp13, Endo Itaru14, Timothy M Pawlik15.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microvascular invasion (MiVI) is a histological feature of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) that may be associated with biological behavior. We sought to investigate the impact of MiVI on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative-intent resection for ICC.
METHODS: A total of 1089 patients undergoing curative-intent resection for ICC were identified. Data on clinicopathological characteristics, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared among patients with no vascular invasion (NoVI), MiVI, and macrovascular invasion (MaVI).
RESULTS: A total of 249 (22.9%) patients had MiVI, while 149 (13.7%) patients had MaVIMiVI). MiVI was associated with higher incidence of perineural, biliary and adjacent organ invasion, and satellite lesions (all P < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, MiVI was an independent risk factor of DFS (hazard ratios [HR] 1.5; 95%confidence intervals [CI], 1.3-1.9; P < 0.001), but not OS (HR 1.1; 95%CI, 0.9-1.3; P = 0.379). While MiVI and MaVI patients had similar DFS (median, MiVI 14.0 vs MaVI 12.0 months, HR 0.9; 95%CI, 0.7-1.2; P = 0.377), OS was better among MiVI patients (median, MiVI 39.0 vs MaVI 21.0 months, HR 0.7; 95%CI, 0.5-0.8; P = 0.002). Whereas nodal metastasis, R1 margin, and postoperative morbidity were associated with early death (≤18 months) among patients with MiVI, only nodal metastasis was associated with late (>18 months) prognosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Roughly 1 out of 5 patients with resected ICC had MiVI. MiVI was associated with advanced tumor characteristics and a higher risk of tumor recurrence.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC); macrovascular invasion (MaVI); microvascular invasion (MiVI); prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30466151     DOI: 10.1002/jso.25305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  12 in total

1.  Use of preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score as a better prognostic marker for distal cholangiocarcinoma after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Fumihiro Terasaki; Teiichi Sugiura; Yukiyasu Okamura; Takaaki Ito; Yusuke Yamamoto; Ryo Ashida; Katsuhisa Ohgi; Katsuhiko Uesaka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prognostic Factors for Early Recurrence in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Curative-Intent Resection.

Authors:  Woo Jin Choi; Phil J Williams; Marco P A W Claasen; Tommy Ivanics; Marina Englesakis; Steven Gallinger; Bettina Hansen; Gonzalo Sapisochin
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Dissection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Patients With Clinically Negative Lymph Node Metastasis: A Multi-Center Study From China.

Authors:  Qiao Ke; Lei Wang; Ziguo Lin; Jianying Lou; Shuguo Zheng; Xinyu Bi; Jianming Wang; Wei Guo; Fuyu Li; Jian Wang; Yamin Zheng; Jingdong Li; Shi Cheng; Weiping Zhou; Yongyi Zeng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients with microvascular invasion: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Zhangjun Cheng; Zhengqing Lei; Xiaoling Jin; Qi Zhang; Anfeng Si; Pinghua Yang; Jiahua Zhou; Daniel Hartmann; Norbert Hüser; Feng Shen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-04

5.  Surgical management of biliary malignancy.

Authors:  T Peter Kingham; Victoria G Aveson; Alice C Wei; Jason A Castellanos; Peter J Allen; Daniel P Nussbaum; Yinin Hu; Michael I D'Angelica
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: which preoperative clinical data and conventional MRI characteristics have value for the prediction of microvascular invasion and clinical significance?

Authors:  Xiaolong Wang; Wentao Wang; Xijuan Ma; Xin Lu; Shaodong Li; Mengsu Zeng; Kai Xu; Chun Yang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Risk prediction in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Direct comparison of the MEGNA score and the 8th edition of the UICC/AJCC Cancer staging system.

Authors:  Felix Hahn; Lukas Müller; Aline Mähringer-Kunz; Sebastian Schotten; Christoph Düber; Jan B Hinrichs; Sabine K Maschke; Peter R Galle; Fabian Bartsch; Hauke Lang; Arndt Weinmann; Roman Kloeckner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A Transcriptomic Signature for Risk-Stratification and Recurrence Prediction in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yuma Wada; Mitsuo Shimada; Kensuke Yamamura; Takeo Toshima; Jasjit K Banwait; Yuji Morine; Tetsuya Ikemoto; Yu Saito; Hideo Baba; Masaki Mori; Ajay Goel
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 17.298

9.  Impact of liver fibrosis score on prognosis after common therapies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Jian Xi Zhang; Peipei Li; Zhibin Chen; Huogui Lin; Zhezhen Cai; Weijia Liao; Zirong Pan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Effects of microvascular invasion on clinical outcomes after resection with curative intent for cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Bo-Hye Song; Boram Cha; Jin-Seok Park; Seok Jeong; Don Haeng Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.