| Literature DB >> 30465288 |
Junliang Zhao1,2, Wu Yang1,2, Shaohong Zhang1,2, Tifeng Yang1,2, Qin Liu1,2, Jingfang Dong1,2, Hua Fu1,2, Xingxue Mao1,2, Bin Liu3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cadmium (Cd) accumulation in rice followed by transfer to the food chain causes severe health problems in humans. Breeding of low Cd accumulation varieties is one of the most economical ways to solve the problem. However, information on the identity of rice germplasm with low Cd accumulation is limited, particularly in indica, and the genetic basis of Cd accumulation in rice is not well understood.Entities:
Keywords: Cadmium accumulation; Genome-wide association study (GWAS); Quantitative trait locus (QTL); Rice (Oryza sativa L.)
Year: 2018 PMID: 30465288 PMCID: PMC6249348 DOI: 10.1186/s12284-018-0254-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rice (N Y) ISSN: 1939-8425 Impact factor: 4.783
Fig. 1Distribution of Cd concentration in grain in 312 rice accessions and comparisons of Cd concentration in grain between subspecies and between subgroups. a, Distribution of Cd concentration in grain of 312 rice accessions. b, Comparison of Cd concentration in grain between indica and japonica species. c, Comparison of Cd concentration in grain between Temperate and Tropical japonica. *** and ** represent significant difference at p < 0.001,and p < 0.01 in t-test
The rice accessions with Cd concentration lower than 0.2 mg/kg in grain
| Accession name | Subpopulation | Origin | Cd concentration in grain (mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BOL ZO |
| Korea Rep | 0.12 |
| IAC 164 | Tropical | Brazil | 0.13 |
| CHERIVIRUPPU |
| India | 0.14 |
| LEVANTE HOMEM | Tropical | Brazil | 0.15 |
| PACHOLINHA | Tropical | Brazil | 0.15 |
| ARAGUAIA | Tropical | Brazil | 0.15 |
| KWADWO AMOA | Tropical | Ghana | 0.15 |
| GBANTE | Tropical | Ivory Coast | 0.16 |
| MUT IAC 25–44-807 | Tropical | Guyana | 0.16 |
| TOANG | Tropical | Indonesia | 0.16 |
| KETAN MERAH | Tropical | Indonesia | 0.16 |
| PATO DE GALLINAZO | Tropical | Australia | 0.16 |
| BOTRA FOTSY | Tropical | Madagascar | 0.16 |
| VARY MAINTY | Tropical | Madagascar | 0.16 |
| VARY SOMOTRA SIHANAKA | Tropical | Madagascar | 0.17 |
| MANGAVAVA FOTSILANSTSIKA | Tropical | Madagascar | 0.17 |
| BAKAW | Tropical | Philippines | 0.18 |
| HONDURAS | Tropical | Spain | 0.18 |
| IRAT 364 | Tropical | Nicaragua | 0.18 |
| ARC 18294 |
| India | 0.19 |
| RXAR RGUE: | Tropical | United States | 0.19 |
| WAB 56–125 | Tropical | Ivory Coast | 0.19 |
| 1–52-6 | Tropical | Brazil | 0.19 |
| BOMALASANG | Tropical | Philippines | 0.19 |
Fig. 2GWAS of grain Cd accumulation using the 312 rice accessions. a, QQ-plot for GWAS of Cd concentration in grain. b, LD decay of the whole population. c, Manhattan plots of GWAS of grain Cd accumulation in 12 chromosomes. d, Colocalization of OsLCD with qCd-1. e, Co-localization of OsHMA3, OsNRAMP1 and OsNRAMP5 with qCd3–1 and qCd3–2
QTL associated with Cd accumulation identified by GWAS using different populations
| QTLs | Chromosome | Linked SNP position a | Phenotype contribution (%) | Candidate gene | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Composite population | |||||
| | 1 | 41,982,531 | 2.43E-06 | 4.66 |
|
| | 2 | 2,060,980 | 6.01E-05 | 2.40 | |
| | 2 | 5,523,027 | 4.38E-05 | 3.47 | |
| | 2 | 23,732,572 | 6.88E-05 | 2.71 | |
| | 3 | 4,848,498 | 1.04E-05 | 4.06 | |
| | 3 | 5,635,117 | 2.78E-06 | 4.61 | |
| | 4 | 20,074,216 | 4.67E-05 | 2.53 | |
| | 7 | 7,186,204 | 1.69E-06 | 4.82 |
|
| | 7 | 8,263,482 | 1.86E-06 | 4.78 | |
| | 7 | 18,553,958 | 1.14E-05 | 4.02 | |
| | 8 | 902,085 | 3.25E-05 | 3.01 | |
| | 8 | 18,365,933 | 3.82E-06 | 4.48 | |
| | 8 | 27,463,194 | 3.12E-05 | 2.60 | |
| | 11 | 14,891,373 | 2.48E-05 | ||
| Indica | |||||
| | 1 | 41,982,531 | 8.89E-05 | 6.85 |
|
| | 2 | 2,060,980 | 7.66E-04 | 5.00 | |
| | 2 | 4,986,931 | 2.27E-04 | 6.04 | |
| | 3 | 27,195,551 | 3.06E-04 | 5.78 | |
| | 4 | 20,368,258 | 1.34E-04 | 5.93 | |
| | 5 | 23,588,056 | 4.53E-04 | 5.45 | |
| | 8 | 899,377 | 1.93E-05 | 8.20 | |
| Japonica | |||||
| | 2 | 23,666,135 | 5.23E-05 | 12.74 | |
| | 3 | 5,507,369 | 3.81E-04 | 9.63 | |
| | 7 | 7,451,789 | 3.52E-04 | 9.75 |
|
| | 7 | 8,467,983 | 1.56E-04 | 11.01 | |
| | 7 | 24,677,317 | 3.71E-05 | 13.29 | |
| | 7 | 27,037,840 | 6.24E-04 | 8.88 | |
| | 11 | 25,263,712 | 4.09E-04 | 9.52 | |
aPosition of SNP is base on rice reference sequence MSU V 7.0. (Kawahara et al. 2013)
Fig. 3Manhattan plots of GWAS of grain Cd accumulation using different populations. a, Composite population. b, Indica subpopulation. c, Japonica subpopulation
Fig. 4The location of OsNRAMP2 on chromosome 3 and sequence differences and expression analysis of OsNRAMP2. a, Colocalization of OsNRAMP2 with qCd3–2. The red arrow indicates the location and direction of OsNRAMP2. b, Sequence differences of OsNRAMP2 protein and the respective causal nucleotide differences between high and low Cd accumulation accessions. Sequence differences between high and low Cd accumulation rice accessions are indicated with different background colors. The numbers on the left of each local alignment indicate the position of the first nucleotide/amino acid for the alignment. c, Expression changes of OsNRAMP2 in roots after Cd treatment between high and low Cd accumulation rice accessions. d, Expression changes of OsNRAMP2 in shoot after Cd treatment between high and low Cd accumulation rice accessions
Fig. 5Functional assay of OsNRAMP2 by heterologous expression in yeast. Yeast INVSc1 strain and Δycf1 mutant strain expressing the empty vector (pYES2), OsNRAMP2-H and OsNRAMP2-L were grown in SD-U medium containing concentrations of 0 and 5 μM/10 μM Cd in the presence of glucose (a, b) to suppress the expression of transformed gene, or galactose (c, d) to induce the expression of transformed gene. E, Cd accumulation in Δycf1 strain expressing empty vector and OsNRAMP2-H, OsNRAMP2-L after exposure to 5 μM Cd for 1, 2 and 4 h. Data are means ± SD of three biological replicates. *** p < 0.001 in t-test
Fig. 6Subcellular localization of OsNRAMP2. Images of bright field (a-c), EGFP-derived green fluorescence (d-f), chloroplast auto-fluorescence (g-i) and merge images (j-l) of protoplasts expressing EGFP, OsNRAMP2-H::EGFP and OsNRAMP2-L::EGFP