| Literature DB >> 30464978 |
Yuehua Yang1, Baofeng Zhao1, Yuping Gao1, Han Liu1, Yiyao Tian1, Donghuan Qin1, Hongbin Wu1, Wenbo Huang1, Lintao Hou2.
Abstract
We developed novel hybrid ligands to passivate PbS colloidal quantum dots (CQDs), and two kinds of solar cells based on as-synthesized CQDs were fabricated to verify the passivation effects of the ligands. It was found that the ligands strongly affected the optical and electrical properties of CQDs, and the performances of solar cells were enhanced strongly. The optimized hybrid ligands, oleic amine/octyl-phosphine acid/CdCl2 improved power conversion efficiency (PCE) to much higher of 3.72 % for Schottky diode cell and 5.04 % for p-n junction cell. These results may be beneficial to design passivation strategy for low-cost and high-performance CQDs solar cells.Entities:
Keywords: Colloidal quantum dot; Ligands; PbS; Solar cells
Year: 2015 PMID: 30464978 PMCID: PMC6223900 DOI: 10.1007/s40820-015-0046-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomicro Lett ISSN: 2150-5551
Fig. 1The fabrication schematic of PbS CQDs solar cells passivated by hybrid ligands
Fig. 2a UV absorption spectra of PbS CQDs with different hybrid ligands. TEM images of PbS CQDs with different hybrid ligands: b without hybrid ligads (ligand A); c CdCl2 + OLA + OPA (ligand B); d CdCl2 + OLA + TDPA (ligand C); e CdCl2 + OLA +ODPA (ligand D). f XRD patterns of PbS CQDs thin films with different complex ligands
Fig. 3J–V curves of PbS CQDs solar cells with different hybrid ligands a under 100 mW cm−2 AM1.5 illumination; b under dark. c XPS patterns of PbS thin films (ligands A and B). d EQEs of PbS CQDs solar cells
Photovoltaic parameters of PbS CQDs Schottky diode cell with different hybrid ligands
| Devices |
|
| FF (%) | PCE (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 0.36 | 5.541 | 29.07 | 0.58 |
| B | 0.54 | 13.320 | 51.70 | 3.72 |
| C | 0.44 | 11.830 | 46.49 | 2.42 |
| D | 0.42 | 8.932 | 35.18 | 1.32 |
Atom percentage of element content of PbS CQDs solar cells with different hybrid ligands from XPS results
| Sample | Atom (%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C 1s C–C | C 1s C=O | Cl 2p metal chloride | Pb 4f (4d) | S 2p3 (S 2p1) metal sulfide | S 2p3 (S 2p1) thiol | O 1s carbonates/sulfates | O 1s metal oxide | S 2p3 (S 2p1) sulfate | |
| A-passivated PbS | 33.65 | 5.95 | 0 | 10.65 | 19.01 | 6.9 | 20.83 | 0.57 | 2.44 |
| B-passivated PbS | 36.7 | 4.94 | 2.88 | 11.39 | 26.81 | 3.76 | 13.53 | 0 | 0 |
Fig. 4a J–V curves of p–n junction PbS CQDs cells with different hybrid ligands (A, B and C). b Stability of PbS/TiO2 CQDs solar cells devices fabricated using PbS CQDs passivated by ligand B
Photovoltaic parameters of PbS CQDs p–n junction cell with different hybrid ligands
| Devices |
|
| FF (%) | PCE (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 0.40 | 11.11 | 38.5 | 1.71 |
| B | 0.46 | 23.3 | 47 | 5.04 |
| C | 0.48 | 13.81 | 43.1 | 2.86 |
Fig. 5SCLC measurements of PbS CQDs thin films with different hybrid ligands a ligand A, b ligand B, c ligand C, and d ligand D