BACKGROUND: Contemporary approaches to rural generalist medicine training and models of care are developing internationally as part of an integrated response to common challenges faced by rural and remote health services and policymakers (addressing health inequities, workforce shortages, service sustainability concerns). The aim of this study was to review the literature relevant to rural generalist medicine. METHODS: A scoping review was undertaken to answer the broad question 'What is documented on rural generalist medicine?' Literature from January 1988 to April 2017 was searched and, after final eligibility filtering (according to established inclusion and exclusion criteria), 102 articles in English language were included for final analysis. RESULTS: Included papers were analysed and categorised by geographic region, study design and subject themes. The majority of articles (80%) came from Australia/New Zealand and North America, reflecting the relative maturity of programmes supporting rural generalist medicine in those countries. The most common publication type was descriptive opinion pieces (37%), highlighting both a need and an opportunity to undertake and publish more systematic research in this area. Important themes emerging from the review were: Definition Existing pathways and programmes Scope of practice and service models Enablers and barriers to recruitment and retention Reform recommendations There were some variations to, or criticisms of, the definition of rural generalist medicine as applied to this review, although this was only true of a small number of included articles. Across remaining themes, there were many similarities and consistent approaches to rural generalist medicine between countries, with some variations reflecting environmental context and programme maturity. This review identified recent literature from countries with emerging interest in rural generalist medicine in response to problematic rural health service delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Supported, coordinated rural generalist medicine programmes are being established or developed in a number of countries as part of an integrated response to rural health and workforce concerns. Findings of this review highlight an opportunity to better share the development and evaluation of best practice models in rural generalist medicine.
BACKGROUND: Contemporary approaches to rural generalist medicine training and models of care are developing internationally as part of an integrated response to common challenges faced by rural and remote health services and policymakers (addressing health inequities, workforce shortages, service sustainability concerns). The aim of this study was to review the literature relevant to rural generalist medicine. METHODS: A scoping review was undertaken to answer the broad question 'What is documented on rural generalist medicine?' Literature from January 1988 to April 2017 was searched and, after final eligibility filtering (according to established inclusion and exclusion criteria), 102 articles in English language were included for final analysis. RESULTS: Included papers were analysed and categorised by geographic region, study design and subject themes. The majority of articles (80%) came from Australia/New Zealand and North America, reflecting the relative maturity of programmes supporting rural generalist medicine in those countries. The most common publication type was descriptive opinion pieces (37%), highlighting both a need and an opportunity to undertake and publish more systematic research in this area. Important themes emerging from the review were: Definition Existing pathways and programmes Scope of practice and service models Enablers and barriers to recruitment and retention Reform recommendations There were some variations to, or criticisms of, the definition of rural generalist medicine as applied to this review, although this was only true of a small number of included articles. Across remaining themes, there were many similarities and consistent approaches to rural generalist medicine between countries, with some variations reflecting environmental context and programme maturity. This review identified recent literature from countries with emerging interest in rural generalist medicine in response to problematic rural health service delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Supported, coordinated rural generalist medicine programmes are being established or developed in a number of countries as part of an integrated response to rural health and workforce concerns. Findings of this review highlight an opportunity to better share the development and evaluation of best practice models in rural generalist medicine.
Entities:
Keywords:
Generalism; Medicine; Primary health care; Remote; Rural
Authors: John W Larkin; Maggie Han; Hao Han; Murilo H Guedes; Priscila Bezerra Gonçalves; Carlos Eduardo Poli-de-Figueiredo; Américo Lourenço Cuvello-Neto; Ana Beatriz L Barra; Thyago Proença de Moraes; Len A Usvyat; Peter Kotanko; Maria Eugenia F Canziani; Jochen G Raimann; Roberto Pecoits-Filho Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2020-05-25 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Belinda O'Sullivan; Matthew McGrail; Tiana Gurney; Priya Martin Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Karen Johnston; Monsie Guingona; Salwa Elsanousi; Jabu Mbokazi; Charlie Labarda; Fortunato L Cristobal; Shambhu Upadhyay; Abu-Bakr Othman; Torres Woolley; Balkrishna Acharya; John C Hogenbirk; Sarangan Ketheesan; Jonathan C Craig; Andre-Jacques Neusy; Sarah Larkins Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2020-10-19
Authors: Eliana E Kim; David Araujo; Bruce Dahlman; Shivum Agarwal; Pratap Prasad; Walter Johnson; Kee B Park Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2020-08-27 Impact factor: 9.408