Literature DB >> 30461555

A Retrospective Study of 199 Xen45 Stent Implantations From 2014 to 2016.

Astrid Heidinger1, Christoph Schwab1, Ewald Lindner1, Regina Riedl2, Georg Mossböck1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to determine the postoperative course after Xen45 Gel Stent implantation at the Medical University of Graz from 2014-2016.
METHODS: Single-center, retrospective study. All patients with Xen implantation between 2014 and 2016 were included. Clinical records and reports received from supervising ophthalmologists were used for evaluations. Investigated parameters were intraocular pressure (IOP), the number of medications, visual acuity, and the number of previous operations, IOP-follow-up, intraoperative and postoperative complications, the rate of interventions (needling), and additionally performed surgeries.
RESULTS: Xen was implanted in 199 eyes of 160 patients. Mean preoperative IOP was 22.8±6.9 mm Hg on 2.9±1.0 IOP-lowering medication. After 12 months follow-up, mean IOP was 17.1±5.9 mm Hg (n=89, P<0.0001; mean reduction of 22.7%) on 1.8±1.4 (n=87; P<0.0001) IOP-lowering medications. There were no intraoperative complications and in two cases (1.0%) severe postoperative adverse events occurred (aqueous misdirection and late-onset endophthalmitis). Postoperative needling was indicated in 44 cases (22.1%), while in 28 cases (14.1%) an additional glaucoma surgery was performed.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that Xen implantation is an effective surgical intervention leading to a significant reduction of IOP and number of medications with a low rate of complications. An attentive postoperative management seems to be mandatory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30461555     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  22 in total

1.  XEN Gel Stent to Treat ICE Syndrome: 4 Cases.

Authors:  Michael M Lin; William H Morgan; Natasha N Kolomeyer; Stephen J Moster; Cindy X Zheng; Antonio Giubilato; Marlene R Moster
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Multicenter case series of standalone XEN implant vs. combination with phacoemulsification in Turkish patients.

Authors:  Muhsin Eraslan; Altan Atakan Özcan; Volkan Dericioğlu; Emine Çiloğlu
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Complications and post-operative interventions in XEN45 gel stent implantation in the treatment of open angle glaucoma-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bjorn Kaijun Betzler; Sheng Yang Lim; Boon Ang Lim; Vivien Cherng Hui Yip; Bryan Chin Hou Ang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Glaucoma medical treatment as a predictor of XEN45 subconjunctival gel implant hypotensive efficacy.

Authors:  Carmen Méndez-Hernández; Carlos Palomino-Bautista; Ramón Torres-Imaz; Pilar Peña-Urbina; Lucía Perucho-González; Julián García-Feijoo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 5.  Standalone XEN45 Gel Stent implantation versus combined XEN45-phacoemulsification in the treatment of open angle glaucoma-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sheng Yang Lim; Bjorn Kaijun Betzler; Leonard Wei Leon Yip; Syril Dorairaj; Bryan Chin Hou Ang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 6.  Evaluating glaucoma surgeries in the MIGS context.

Authors:  Deepika Dhingra; Shibal Bhartiya
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020 Apr-Jun

7.  Revisiting Results of Conventional Surgery: Trabeculectomy, Glaucoma Drainage Devices, and Deep Sclerectomy in the Era of MIGS.

Authors:  Shibal Bhartiya; Deepika Dhingra; Tarek Shaarawy
Journal:  J Curr Glaucoma Pract       Date:  2019 May-Aug

8.  Comparing the efficacy of trabeculectomy and XEN gel microstent implantation for the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma: a retrospective monocentric comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Theresa Theilig; Matus Rehak; Catharina Busch; Caroline Bormann; Marc Schargus; Jan Darius Unterlauft
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Outcomes of XEN45 gel stent using posterior small incision sub-tenon ab interno insertion (Semi-open) technique.

Authors:  Yu Xiang George Kong; In Young Chung; Ghee Soon Ang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.456

10.  Technique of Xen Implant Revision Surgery and the Surgical Outcomes: A Retrospective Interventional Case Series.

Authors:  Emma Linton; Leon Au
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2020-02-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.