Literature DB >> 30460156

Polarimetric measurement utility for pre-cancer detection from uterine cervix specimens.

Meredith Kupinski1,2, Matthieu Boffety3, François Goudail3, Razvigor Ossikovski1, Angelo Pierangelo1, Jean Rehbinder1, Jérémy Vizet1, Tatiana Novikova1.   

Abstract

Prior work demonstrated significant contrast in visible wavelength Mueller matrix images for healthy and pre-cancerous regions of excised cervical tissue. This work demonstrates post-processing compressions of the full Mueller matrix that preserve detection performance. The purpose of this post-processing is to understand polarimetric measurement utility for computing mathematical observers and designing future imaging protocols. The detection performance of the full Mueller matrix, and both linear and non-linear parameters of the Mueller matrix will be compared. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, otherwise known as the AUC, is the gold standard metric to quantify detection performance in medical applications. An AUC = 1 is perfect detection and AUC = 0.5 is the performance of guessing. Either the scalar retardance or the 3 smallest eigenvalues of the coherency matrix yield an average AUC of 0.94 or 0.93, respectively. When these four non-linear parameters are used simultaneously the average AUC is 0.95. The J-optimal Channelized Quadratic Observer (J-CQO) method for optimizing polarimetric measurements demonstrates equivalent AUC values for the full Muller matrix and 6 J-CQO optimized measurements. The advantage of this optimization is that only 6 measurements, instead of 16 for the full Mueller matrix, are required to achieve this AUC.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30460156      PMCID: PMC6238933          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.9.005691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.732


  16 in total

1.  Design and optimization of partial Mueller matrix polarimeters.

Authors:  J Scott Tyo; Zhipeng Wang; Sergio J Johnson; Brian G Hoover
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 1.980

2.  Structured decomposition design of partial Mueller matrix polarimeters.

Authors:  Andrey S Alenin; J Scott Tyo
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  General and self-consistent method for the calibration of polarization modulators, polarimeters, and mueller-matrix ellipsometers.

Authors:  E Compain; S Poirier; B Drevillon
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 1.980

Review 4.  Mueller polarimetric imaging for surgical and diagnostic applications: a review.

Authors:  Ji Qi; Daniel S Elson
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.207

5.  Application of spectroscopic ellipsometry and Mueller ellipsometry to optical characterization.

Authors:  Enric Garcia-Caurel; Antonello De Martino; Jean-Paul Gaston; Li Yan
Journal:  Appl Spectrosc       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.388

6.  Ex vivo Mueller polarimetric imaging of the uterine cervix: a first statistical evaluation.

Authors:  Jean Rehbinder; Huda Haddad; Stanislas Deby; Benjamin Teig; André Nazac; Tatiana Novikova; Angelo Pierangelo; François Moreau
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  Method for optimizing channelized quadratic observers for binary classification of large-dimensional image datasets.

Authors:  M K Kupinski; E Clarkson
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Polarimetric imaging of uterine cervix: a case study.

Authors:  Angelo Pierangelo; André Nazac; Abdelali Benali; Pierre Validire; Henri Cohen; Tatiana Novikova; Bicher Haj Ibrahim; Sandeep Manhas; Clément Fallet; Maria-Rosaria Antonelli; Antonello-De Martino
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  In vivo imaging of uterine cervix with a Mueller polarimetric colposcope.

Authors:  Jérémy Vizet; Jean Rehbinder; Stanislas Deby; Stéphane Roussel; André Nazac; Ranya Soufan; Catherine Genestie; Christine Haie-Meder; Hervé Fernandez; François Moreau; Angelo Pierangelo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Optical techniques for cervical neoplasia detection.

Authors:  Tatiana Novikova
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.649

View more
  3 in total

1.  Real-time Jones phase microscopy for studying transparent and birefringent specimens.

Authors:  Yuheng Jiao; Mikhail E Kandel; Xiaojun Liu; Wenlong Lu; Gabriel Popescu
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Digital histology with Mueller microscopy: how to mitigate an impact of tissue cut thickness fluctuations.

Authors:  Hee Ryung Lee; Pengcheng Li; Thomas Sang Hyuk Yoo; Christian Lotz; Florian Kai Groeber-Becker; Sofia Dembski; Enric Garcia-Caurel; Razvigor Ossikovski; Hui Ma; Tatiana Novikova
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Mueller matrix imaging for collagen scoring in mice model of pregnancy.

Authors:  Hee Ryung Lee; Ilyas Saytashev; Vinh Nguyen Du Le; Mala Mahendroo; Jessica Ramella-Roman; Tatiana Novikova
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.