Literature DB >> 30460132

Doppler OCT clutter rejection using variance minimization and offset extrapolation.

Adil Akif1, Konrad Walek2,3, Collin Polucha1, Jonghwan Lee1,4.   

Abstract

Doppler optical coherence tomography (OCT) is widely used for high-resolution mapping of flow velocities and is based on analysis of temporal changes in the phase of an OCT signal (i.e., how fast the OCT signal rotates in the complex plane). Determination of the rate of phase change or rotation speed critically depends on the center of rotation. Here, we demonstrate the bias in high-pass filtering, the current widely used method to determine the center of rotation, and propose two advanced methods for Doppler OCT clutter rejection. The bias in the high-pass filtering method becomes increasingly significant with lower velocities or larger signal noise. Two novel methods based on variance minimization and offset extrapolation can potentially reduce this bias and thereby improve the accuracy of Doppler OCT measurements of flow velocities, even for low-velocity and/or high-noise signals. The two novel methods and the current standard method (high-pass filtering) have been tested in combination with several currently used velocity measurement algorithms: Kasai, autocorrelation function fitting, and maximum likelihood estimation. The newly proposed methods are shown to improve the accuracy in both the center of rotation and resultant velocity by up to 60 percentage points and reduce the flow conservation error by 30% when applied to in vivo cerebral blood flow imaging of the rodent brain cortex.

Year:  2018        PMID: 30460132      PMCID: PMC6238902          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.9.005340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.732


  22 in total

1.  Application of autoregressive methods to multigate spectral analysis.

Authors:  G Guidi; L Corti; P Tortoli
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  A new clutter rejection algorithm for Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  Guy Cloutier; Danmin Chen; Louis-Gilles Durand
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Real-time in vivo blood-flow imaging by moving-scatterer-sensitive spectral-domain optical Doppler tomography.

Authors:  Hongwu Ren; Tao Sun; Daniel J MacDonald; Michael J Cobb; Xingde Li
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 3.776

4.  Clutter rejection filters in color flow imaging: a theoretical approach.

Authors:  H Torp
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  D Huang; E A Swanson; C P Lin; J S Schuman; W G Stinson; W Chang; M R Hee; T Flotte; K Gregory; C A Puliafito
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Improved estimation of low velocities in color Doppler imaging by adapting the mean frequency estimator to the clutter rejection filter.

Authors:  A Herment; G Demoment; P Dumée
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Dynamic light scattering optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jonghwan Lee; Weicheng Wu; James Y Jiang; Bo Zhu; David A Boas
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Quantitative imaging of cerebral blood flow velocity and intracellular motility using dynamic light scattering-optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jonghwan Lee; Harsha Radhakrishnan; Weicheng Wu; Ali Daneshmand; Mihail Climov; Cenk Ayata; David A Boas
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 6.200

9.  Clutter rejection filters for optical Doppler tomography.

Authors:  Hongwu Ren; Xingde Li
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2006-06-26       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Comparison of Kasai autocorrelation and maximum likelihood estimators for Doppler optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Aaron C Chan; Edmund Y Lam; Vivek J Srinivasan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  2 in total

1.  Optical coherence tomography velocimetry based on decorrelation estimation of phasor pair ratios (DEPPAIR).

Authors:  Maximilian G O Gräfe; Oleg Nadiarnykh; Johannes F De Boer
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Validation of red blood cell flux and velocity estimations based on optical coherence tomography intensity fluctuations.

Authors:  Paul J Marchand; Xuecong Lu; Cong Zhang; Frédéric Lesage
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.