| Literature DB >> 30460103 |
Quanxin Gao1, Yanfeng Yue1, Minghua Min1, Shiming Peng1, Zhaohong Shi1, Jinbo Wang2, Tao Zhang3.
Abstract
The Kelp grouper Epinephelus moara is one of the most widely consumed and economically important marine fish in China. The species can tolerate a wide range of salinity, but genomic resources are not available, and the molecular mechanisms underlying adaptation to salinity at the transcriptomic level remain largely unclear. In this study, the transcriptomic responses of the liver of E. moara under low salinity were investigated using the Illumina digital gene expression system. After de novo assembly, 499,356 transcripts were generated and contributed 445,068 unigenes. A total of 14, 19, 33 and 3101 genes were differentially expressed following exposure to low salinity stress for 2, 6, 24 and 48 h, respectively. Only two genes were differentially expressed in all groups. Four genes related to metabolism and ambient salinity adaption were randomly selected to validate the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) by real-time PCR. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis were used to analyse the functional significance of DEGs, including those responding to salinity through diverse biological processes, cellular components, molecular functions, and pathways associated with metabolic and osmotic responses. This work provides new insight into the response to salinity challenges in E. moara, and the findings expand our knowledge of the molecular basis of metabolic regulation mechanisms in this species. Additionally, the transcriptional data provide a valuable resource for future molecular and genetic studies on E. moara.Entities:
Keywords: Epinephelus moara; low-salinity stress; transcriptome
Year: 2018 PMID: 30460103 PMCID: PMC6138362 DOI: 10.1080/19768354.2018.1487335
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anim Cells Syst (Seoul) ISSN: 1976-8354 Impact factor: 1.815
Sequences of primers used in real-time PCR assays.
| Target Genes | Primer Sequences | Size (bp) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRAF-type zinc finger domain-containing protein 1-like | F (5′-3′) | GGAGAAGGTTGGGTAGTTG | 120 |
| R (5′-3′) | GCTGGAGGTGTAGAGGGA | ||
| Parvalbumin beta | F (5′-3′) | CTTGTCTGTATCATCTGTACCCTAC | 127 |
| R (5′-3′) | CGAATGTGCCAGCGTCT | ||
| SH3 domain-binding glutamic acid-rich-like protein 3-like | F (5′-3′) | TGCCGCTCACAGTGTTT | 159 |
| R (5′-3′) | CTGCCAACTTCCTCATTACA | ||
| Cold shock domain-containing protein E1 | F (5′-3′) | GCATTGGAGGCATTACG | 107 |
| R (5′-3′) | TACCCACAGGTTGGAGACA | ||
| F (5′-3′) | TGCTGCTTGAGTTTCTACAT | 117 | |
| R (5′-3′) | CCCACTGTCTGCGATTA | ||
Statistical analysis of raw and preprocessed sequences.
| Samples | Raw reads | Raw bases | Trimmed reads | Trimmed bases | Average length (bp) | Trimmed reads % | Trimmed bases % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 h | 63545722 | 9531858300 | 61757036 | 8633992960 | 140 | 97.2 | 90.6 |
| 2 h | 37741048 | 5661157200 | 36311164 | 5035138564 | 139 | 96.2 | 88.9 |
| 6 h | 49822946 | 7473441900 | 47969516 | 6834476368 | 142 | 96.3 | 91.5 |
| 24 h | 64207362 | 9631104300 | 62429208 | 8813244643 | 141 | 97.2 | 91.5 |
| 48 h | 126858410 | 19028761500 | 124017584 | 17129141793 | 138 | 97.8 | 90.0 |
Summary of de novo assembly of transcriptomic profiles.
| Samples | Unigenes | Transcripts | Aligned reads | Unaligned reads | Aligned rate (%) | Unaligned rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 h | 190163 | 212587 | 35392662 | 26364374 | 57.3 | 42.7 |
| 2 h | 149770 | 168506 | 20299096 | 16012068 | 55.9 | 44.1 |
| 6 h | 175551 | 196690 | 32111410 | 15858106 | 66.9 | 33.1 |
| 24 h | 204610 | 227903 | 37683502 | 24745706 | 60.4 | 39.6 |
| 48 h | 327461 | 369717 | 64141958 | 59875626 | 51.7 | 48.3 |
Number of DEGs, GO terms and KEGG pathways (p-value <0.05) from pairwise comparisons.
| Pairwsie comparisons | DEGs | DEGs | ∑ | GO terms | KEGG pathways | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biological process | Cellular component | Molecular function | ∑ | |||||
| 0 h vs. 2 h | 14 | 21 | 35 | 315 | 81 | 58 | 454 | 23 |
| 0 h vs. 6 h | 19 | 29 | 48 | 185 | 42 | 38 | 265 | 4 |
| 0 h vs. 24 h | 33 | 37 | 70 | 184 | 57 | 67 | 308 | 28 |
| 0 h vs. 48 h | 3101 | 40 | 3141 | 1427 | 188 | 540 | 2155 | 95 |
| ∑ | 3167 | 127 | 3294 | 2111 | 368 | 703 | 3182 | 150 |
Figure 1.Comparison of DEGs identified by microarray analysis of Epinephelus moara under low-salinity stress for different durations. (a) Venn diagram showing the number of DEGs present at all four time points. (b) Heat map summarising DEGs identified at different time points.


Figure 3.Validation of RNA-seq data by real-time PCR. The expression of TRAF-type zinc finger domain-containing protein 1-like, parvalbumin beta, SH3 domain-binding glutamic acid-rich-like protein 3-like, and cold shock domain-containing protein E1 was measured by RNA-seq (white columns) and real-time PCR (black columns) and plotted as -log2(fold change).