| Literature DB >> 32295151 |
Ying Qiu1,2, Yanhui Yin3,4, Zhiqiang Ruan1,2, Yu Gao5, Chao Bian2, Jieming Chen1,2, Xiaoai Wang3,4, Xiaofu Pan3,4, Junxing Yang3,4, Qiong Shi1,2, Wansheng Jiang6.
Abstract
Abstract: The notorious parasite Ichthyophthirius multifiliis (Ich) has been recorded worldwide in fish species and causes white spot disease, posing major threats and resulting in severe losses to international fish production. Extensively effective strategies for treating Ich are not available yet, and genetic mechanisms of hosts in response to the parasite are still largely unknown. In this study, we selected Kanglang white minnow (KWM, Anabarilius grahami) to examine its liver transcriptional changes after Ich infection, as white spot disease is one bottleneck problem in exploring this economically important species. We divided the experimental fishes into three groups (control, early-infected, and late-infected) to examine differentially expressed genes (DEGs). A total of 831 DEGs were identified and classified into 128 significantly enriched GO (Gene Ontology) terms and 71 significantly enriched KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathways. Most of these terms or pathways were functionally enriched in immunity, inflammatory response, and apoptosis, such as nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like (NOD-like) receptor signaling, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) signaling, interleukin-17 (IL-17) signaling, and apoptosis pathways. We also identified 178 putative antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and AMP precursors based on our previously reported genome assembly of KWM, and revealed that the expressional patterns varied according to different types. In summary, our work reported the first comprehensive transcriptional changes in KWM in response to the exogenous infection of Ich, which would lay a solid foundation for in-depth studies on disease defense or resistant strains selection in this valuable fish.Entities:
Keywords: Anabarilius grahami; Ichthyophthirius multifiliis; antimicrobial peptide (AMP); immune response; transcriptome sequencing
Year: 2020 PMID: 32295151 PMCID: PMC7222788 DOI: 10.3390/ani10040681
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Figure 1Summary of DEGs identified by three analysis methods within three comparative groups. (A) The number of DEGs identified by three analysis methods in the three comparative groups. (B) The number of up-regulated and down-regulated genes in the three comparative groups. (C) A hierarchical clustering of DEGs identified in the three comparative groups. Scale of the color bar represents fold changes of transcription levels.
Number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), Gene Ontology (GO) terms and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways (p-value < 0.05) from the pairwise comparisons.
| Pairwise Comparison | DEGs | GO Terms | KEGG Pathway | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Up-Regulated | Down-Regulated | Total | Biological Process | Cellular Component | Molecular Function |
| ||
| control vs. early-infected | 118 | 130 | 248 | 20 | 1 | 11 | 32 | 30 |
| control vs. late-infected | 235 | 252 | 487 | 54 | 1 | 23 | 78 | 28 |
| early vs. late-infected | 49 | 47 | 96 | 11 | 1 | 19 | 31 | 18 |
| Total | 402 | 429 | 831 | 85 | 3 | 53 | 128 * | 71 * |
DEGs up-regulated or down-regulated represent that the latter group was up-regulated or down-regulated relative to the former group in each pairwise comparison. * The total number was less than the sum of each line because we removed the overlaps among the three pairwise comparisons.
Figure 2Validation of transcriptome results by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Bars showed the log2-fold change values of nine randomly selected DEGs in two pairwise comparisons: control vs. early-infected stage (A) and control vs. late-infected stage (B). Red columns represent the transcriptional fold changes measured by qRT-PCR, and green columns indicate the RPKM (reads per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped) values measured by the transcriptome sequencing. Error bar of each column represents the standard error of the mean from three independent experimental replicates.
Figure 3Functional analyses of the top 20 GO and KEGG enrichments based on DEGs from three comparative groups. (A) Enriched GO terms for the up-regulated DEGs after the Ichthyophthirius multifiliis (Ich) infections. (B) Enriched KEGG pathways for the up-regulated DEGs after the Ich infections. (C) Enriched GO terms for the down-regulated DEGs after the Ich infections. (D) Enriched KEGG pathways for the down-regulated DEGs after the Ich infections.
Figure 4The summary of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs)/AMP precursors in Kanglang white minnow (KWM) in response to the Ich infections. (A) Confirmed peptides number hit against the gene set in KWM according to the different type of AMPs/AMP precursors (Others includes all other type that with only one or two confirmed peptides under that type). (B) Transcriptional variances of identified AMPs/AMP precursors in KWM in response to the Ich infections. Scale of the color bar represents fold changes of transcription levels in three groups.