| Literature DB >> 30459741 |
Kurt M Yakimovich1,2,3, Erik J S Emilson2,4, Michael A Carson1,3, Andrew J Tanentzap2, Nathan Basiliko1,3, Nadia C S Mykytczuk1,3,5.
Abstract
The microbial communities of lake sediments play key roles in carbon cycling, linking lakes to their surrounding landscapes and to the global climate system as incubators of terrestrial organic matter and emitters of greenhouse gasses, respectively. Here, we amended lake sediments with three different plant leaf litters: a coniferous forest mix, deciduous forest mix, cattails (Typha latifolia) and then examined the bacterial, fungal and methanogen community profiles and abundances. Polyphenols were found to correlate with changes in the bacterial, methanogen, and fungal communities; most notably dominance of fungi over bacteria as polyphenol levels increased with higher abundance of the white rot fungi Phlebia spp. Additionally, we saw a shift in the dominant orders of fermentative bacteria with increasing polyphenol levels, and differences in the dominant methanogen groups, with high CH4 production being more strongly associated with generalist groups of methanogens found at lower polyphenol levels. Our present study provides insights into and basis for future study on how shifting upland and wetland plant communities may influence anaerobic microbial communities and processes in lake sediments, and may alter the fate of terrestrial carbon entering inland waters.Entities:
Keywords: anaerobic; bacteria; decomposition; fungi; lake sediments; methane; methanogen; plant litter decomposition
Year: 2018 PMID: 30459741 PMCID: PMC6232422 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02662
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Total CO2 and CH4 produced shows the modulating effects of plant litter on methanogenesis and methanogen abundance. The top panel shows mean cumulative production of CH4 and CO2 over the 150-day incubation for each plant litter treatment, across each percent organic matter addition, with error bars indicating ± SE (n = 4). The bottom panel shows the corresponding mcrA copy number across treatments, set relative to the un-spiked control, with the dashed lines indicating the respective control copy number.
FIGURE 2PCoAs of un-weighted UniFrac distances using relative abundances for the respective microbial communities from both un-spiked and spiked samples; bacteria (A; 5565 OTUs), fungi (B; subset of 131 OTUs), and methanogens (C; 43 OTUs), across all treatment concentrations. Ellipses represent 95% confidence intervals which were calculated for each incubated treatment. The proportion of variation explained by each axis is given in parentheses. The pre-incubated sediment is both the un-spiked and spiked sediments.
FIGURE 3Mean diversity (±SE) of bacterial (A), fungal (B), and methanogen (C) communities for each plant litter type. Diversity was calculated as Chao 1 values averaged for each plant litter type added to either the un-spiked or spiked amended sediments and pre-incubation plant litter controls. Bacterial values for both the un-spiked and sediment control were 975.5 (±77.5) and 1360.5 (±111.5), respectively, and beyond the y-axis limits therefore not included in the figure. SE for fungal un-spiked sediment control was ±6 and ±171 for the spiked, and ±3.5 and ±0.5, respectively, for methanogens.
FIGURE 4Heat map of indicator fungal OTUs for replicate DNA extractions by organic matter type and their respective starting litter material. OTU number and assigned taxonomic information are identified on the right y-axis, with the lowest identifiable taxonomic rank in brackets when Family and Genus were unknown. The leaf litter control for each material is shown last on the x-axis for each litter type.
FIGURE 5Relative abundance bar plots of mcrA sequences showing methanogen orders in the TYP samples for each sequencing duplicate at each concentration for both the un-spiked and spiked treatments.
FIGURE 6Relative polyphenol concentrations across leaf litter types and dominant bacterial orders. Polyphenol concentrations were standardized to relative concentrations of total dissolved organic carbon. Spiked samples are indicated on the x-axis labels with S. The x-axis was ordered to create a pseudo-concentration gradient of polyphenols across three plant litters with dashed lines denoting different litter types. Polyphenol levels were averaged for each treatment and bars represent standard errors with the shaded area around each trend line representing the 95% confidence interval. Relative abundances from sequencing duplicates were averaged for every OTU to represent each treatment and were then summed by Order.
Quantitative PCR of Bacteria (16S) and Fungi (18S) in sediments and the starting litter OM used to amend the treated sediments.
| Treatment | Fungal1 copies | Bacterial copies | Ratio of fungi to bacteria | Relative2 polyphenol levels (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | 5 | 3.63 × 104 (1.29 × 104) | 2.77 × 105 (4.93 × 104) | 0.13 (0.029) | 21 (0.015) |
| DEC | 6 | 9.51 × 104 (1.34 × 104) | 6.87 × 104 (1.89 × 104) | 1.9 (0.518) | 43 (0.075) |
| TYP | 6 | 1.34 × 104 (2.59 × 104) | 9.63 × 105 (1.13 × 104) | 0.013 (0.001) | 6.6 (0.016) |
| CON Litter control | 1 | 5.32 × 106 | 3.63 × 104 | 146.3 | 37 (0.18) |
| DEC Litter control | 1 | 1.89 × 106 | 7.53 × 104 | 25.2 | 34 (1.13) |
| TYP Litter control | 1 | 4.24 × 106 | 2.58 × 105 | 16.5 | 12 (1.67) |