| Literature DB >> 30456460 |
Sebastian Barth1, Mohamed Marwan2, Jörg Hausleiter3, Werner Moshage4, Grigorios Korosoglou5, Alexander Leber6, Axel Schmermund7, Helmut Gohlke8, Oliver Bruder9, Thorsten Dill10, Stephen Schröder11, Sebastian Kerber12, Karsten Hamm12, Frank Gietzen12, Steffen Schneider13, Jochen Senges13, Stephan Achenbach2.
Abstract
To evaluate diagnostic impact of clinical use of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with suspected stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and its consequences in daily practice for patient management, depending on stress test results in daily practice. Between 2009 and 2014 of a total population of 1352 patients of the German Cardiac Computed Tomography (CT) Registry who had previously undergone stress tests, CCTA visualizations were carried out on the coronary arteries with suspected stable CAD. Patients were divided into three groups according to stress test results: Group 1 with inconclusive (n = 178, 13.2%), Group 2 with ischemia in stress test (n = 372, 27.5%) and Group 3 without ischemia in stress test (n = 802, 59.3%). The test of preference was the stress electrocardiogram (ECG), which was performed more frequently in patients without ischemia in stress test as compared to those with ischemia (96.3% vs. 93.0%, p = 0.015). The incidence of detected obstructive CAD was lower in patients with suggested ischemia in stress test as compared to patients with inconclusive results (14.1% vs. 21.1%, p = 0.037). There was no difference in the incidence of an obstructive CAD in patients with and without ischemia in stress test (14.1% vs. 15.8%, p = 0.440). CCTA is a reliable, non-invasive option for ruling-out obstructive CAD irrespective of the stress test result.Entities:
Keywords: Coronary computed tomography angiography; Pre-test probability; Stable coronary artery disease; Stress test
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30456460 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-018-1504-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ISSN: 1569-5794 Impact factor: 2.357