| Literature DB >> 30456241 |
Umberto M Musazzi1, Antonella Casiraghi1, Silvia Franzé1, Francesco Cilurzo1, Paola Minghetti1.
Abstract
The data presented in this article are related to the research article entitled "Design of in vitro skin permeation studies according to the EMA Guideline on quality of transdermal patches" (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2018.09.014) (Cilurzo et al., 2018) [1]. In vitro permeation studies are generally carried out by Franz's diffusion cell method using human epidermis as a membrane (Franz, 1975) [2]. The evaluation of membrane integrity is mandatory to assure the quality of the experiments. However, the methods used for this determination are different and the results are strictly dependent on the operative conditions. The article reports the electrical resistance values of human epidermis samples and in vitro skin permeability data of caffeine and benzoic acid. The data are used to establish a cut-off suitable for checking the skin integrity. This information may be useful to enable critical or extended analyses in order to contribute to the development of a compendial method.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30456241 PMCID: PMC6231038 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.10.098
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Fig. 1R24/R0 calculated after 24-h incubation of human epidermis with SDS solution (0.05 % - 0.5 % w/v) and purified water as control (mean ± dv.st; n = 3). * p-value < 0.05 in comparison to control.
Electrical resistance data and permeation fluxes of benzoic acid (Jbenz) obtained by in vitro permeation studies. In bold the samples characterized by a low R-value.
| 1 | 20.16 | 52.86 |
| 1 | 19.59 | 72.56 |
| 2 | 22.81 | 62.44 |
| 2 | 47.07 | 50.78 |
| 4 | 23.02 | 65.93 |
| 5 | 22.81 | 58.30 |
| 5 | 17.68 | 64.72 |
| 6 | 32.23 | 42.90 |
| 6 | 33.98 | 38.89 |
| 7 | 19.59 | 43.43 |
| 9 | 31.42 | 57.77 |
| 11 | 44.09 | 46.57 |
| 11 | 23.02 | 54.77 |
| 12 | 31.42 | 66.34 |
Electrical resistance data and permeation fluxes of caffeine (Jcaff) obtained by in vitro permeation studies. In bold the samples characterized by a low R-value.
| 2 | 29.14 | 1.35 |
| 3 | 36.30 | 0.83 |
| 3 | 40.99 | 0.23 |
| 4 | 34.85 | 0.22 |
| 4 | 29.68 | 0.35 |
| 8 | 33.68 | 0.83 |
| 8 | 36.25 | 1.45 |
| 9 | 25.36 | 0.40 |
| 10 | 28.87 | 0.40 |
| 10 | 56.55 | 0.55 |
| 11 | 38.22 | 0.85 |
| 12 | 33.39 | 0.53 |
| 12 | 47.51 | 0.50 |
| Subject area | |
|---|---|
| More specific subject area | |
| Type of data | |
| How data was acquired | |
| Data format | |
| Experimental factors | |
| Experimental features | |
| Data source location | |
| Data accessibility | |
| Related research article |