Literature DB >> 30456231

Digital templates and brain atlas dataset for the mouse lemur primate.

Nachiket A Nadkarni1,2, Salma Bougacha1,2,3,4, Clément Garin1,2, Marc Dhenain1,2, Jean-Luc Picq1,2,5.   

Abstract

We present a dataset made of 3D digital brain templates and of an atlas of the gray mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus), a small prosimian primate of growing interest for studies of primate biology and evolution. A template image was constructed from in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of 34 animals. This template was then manually segmented into 40 cortical, 74 subcortical and 6 cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) regions. Additionally, the dataset contains probability maps of gray matter, white matter and CSF. The template, manual segmentation and probability maps can be downloaded in NIfTI-1 format at https://www.nitrc.org/projects/mouselemuratlas. Further construction and validation details are given in "A 3D population-based brain atlas of the mouse lemur primate with examples of applications in aging studies and comparative anatomy" (Nadkarni et al., 2018) [1], which also presents applications of the atlas such as automatic assessment of regional age-associated cerebral atrophy and comparative neuroanatomy studies.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30456231      PMCID: PMC6230976          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.10.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications table A brain template was constructed from T2-weighted images of 34 mouse lemurs. The template was segmented into 120 regions that covered the whole brain. A probabilistic atlas was created from the initial brain template. Value of the data This is the first publicly available whole brain template and atlas for the mouse lemur, an emergent model in neuroscience. The mouse lemur template and brain atlas can be used to study brain images of mouse lemurs recorded with various imaging modalities. A probabilistic atlas of the mouse lemur is also provided. It can be used as a prior for automatic segmentation studies.

Data

MR images of the brain of 34 healthy young adult mouse lemurs (Table 1) were acquired in a 7 T scanner. 3D images of the whole brain were mutually registered to create a template (Fig. 1A). This template was used for manual segmentation (Fig. 1, Table 2) and to create probabilistic gray matter, white matter and CSF templates of the brain (Fig. 2). The templates and atlas are available as NIfTI volumes in an NITRC repository (https://www.nitrc.org/projects/mouselemuratlas). The dataset can be freely used for academic work upon citing this paper and [1].
Table 1

List of mouse lemurs used for atlas creation.

SexAge (months)Age (years)
147BCBBM282.3
190IABM322.7
265BM322.7
190ICM322.7
967HACAM342.8
965MBGAM352.9
965MBFAM352.9
965MBFBM352.9
184CAM352.9
965MBIAM363.0
211DBAM393.2
169ABBM393.2
169ABCM393.2
259BBM403.3
199CBBM403.3
219GM403.3
189CBDM443.7
190IAAM463.8
260BM463.8
147BCBAM463.8
213ABAM473.9
153FBAM494.1
211EAM514.2
289BBF151.3
208CBFF181.5
288BCF181.5
310CF262.2
211AEF282.3
965MBFCF352.9
169BABF352.9
184CBF363.0
967HACBF363.0
943GKBCF443.7
216BF584.8
Fig. 1

Labeling of the mouse lemur atlas. Brain structure delineations are shown in a coronal section (B) together with the corresponding template image (A). For clarity, the label marking surrounding CSF is not displayed. Superior (C) and inferior (D) views of the three-dimensional representation of the brain atlas. Anterior views of the basal ganglia (E) and limbic structures (F). Annotations: a = amygdala, ca = caudate nucleus, f = fornix, g = globus pallidus, h = hippocampus, p = putamen. Scale bar = 1 cm.

Table 2

Labels of all brain structures used in the atlas. Note that label ID corresponds to voxel intensity in the atlas file that can be downloaded from https://www.nitrc.org/projects/mouselemuratlas.

Label IDBrain structure nameLabel IDBrain structure name
1hippocampal formation L61mammillary body L
2hippocampal formation R62mammillary body R
3amygdala L63hypophysis
4amygdala R64pons L
5caudate nucleus L65pons R
6caudate nucleus R66nucleus accumbens L
7stria terminalis L67nucleus accumbens R
8stria terminalis R68basal forebrain nucleus L
9CSF69basal forebrain nucleus R
10anterior commissure70cerebellum L
11arbor vitae of cerebellum L71cerebellum R
12corpus callosum72arbor vitae of cerebellum R
13fasciculus retroflexus L73cerebral aqueduct
14fasciculus retroflexus R74posterior commissure
15fornix L75cerebral cortex: area 6L
16fornix R76cerebral cortex: area 4L
17mamillo-thalamic tract L77cerebral cortex: area 8L
18mamillo-thalamic tract R78cerebral cortex: area 1–3L
19optic tract L79cerebral cortex: area 5L
20optic tract R80cerebral cortex: area 7L
21commissure of the inferior colliculus81cerebral cortex: area 13–16L
22stria medullaris of the thalamus L82cerebral cortex: area 21L
23stria medullaris of the thalamus R83cerebral cortex: area 22-(41–42) L
24basal forebrain L84cerebral cortex: area 20L
25basal forebrain R85cerebral cortex: area 18L
26substantia nigra R86cerebral cortex: area 17L
27substantia nigra L87cerebral cortex: area 28L
28midbrain L88cerebral cortex: area 24L
29midbrain R89cerebral cortex: area 23L
30subthalamic nucleus L90cerebral cortex: area 30L
31subthalamic nucleus R91cerebral cortex: area 26–29 (retrosplenial area) L
32globus pallidus L92cerebral cortex: area 27L
33globus pallidus R93cerebral cortex: prepyriform and periamygdalar areas L
34putamen L94cerebral cortex: area 25L
35putamen R95cerebral cortex: area 6R
36habenula L96cerebral cortex: area 4R
37habenula R97cerebral cortex: area 8R
38septum L98cerebral cortex: area 1–3R
39septum R99cerebral cortex: area 5R
40claustrum L100cerebral cortex: area 7R
41claustrum R101cerebral cortex: area 13–16R
42hypothalamus L102cerebral cortex: area 21R
43hypothalamus R103cerebral cortex: area 22-(41–42) R
44thalamus L104cerebral cortex: area 20R
45thalamus R105cerebral cortex: area 18R
46central gray of the midbrain106cerebral cortex: area 17R
47inferior colliculus L107cerebral cortex: area 28R
48inferior colliculus R108cerebral cortex: area 24R
49superior colliculus L109cerebral cortex: area 23R
50superior colliculus R110cerebral cortex: area 30R
51olfactory bulb L111cerebral cortex: area 26–29 (retrosplenial area) R
52olfactory bulb R112cerebral cortex: area 27R
53cerebral peduncle L113cerebral cortex: prepyriform and periamygdalar areas R
54cerebral peduncle R114cerebral cortex: area 25R
55internal capsule L115olfactory tubercle L
56internal capsule R116olfactory tubercle R
57lateral ventricle L117olfactory tract L
58lateral ventricle R118olfactory tract R
59third ventricle119optic chiasm
60fourth ventricle120medulla
Fig. 2

Template of the mouse lemur brain compared to probability maps and a representative image from a single animal. Scale bar: 5 mm.

List of mouse lemurs used for atlas creation. Labeling of the mouse lemur atlas. Brain structure delineations are shown in a coronal section (B) together with the corresponding template image (A). For clarity, the label marking surrounding CSF is not displayed. Superior (C) and inferior (D) views of the three-dimensional representation of the brain atlas. Anterior views of the basal ganglia (E) and limbic structures (F). Annotations: a = amygdala, ca = caudate nucleus, f = fornix, g = globus pallidus, h = hippocampus, p = putamen. Scale bar = 1 cm. Labels of all brain structures used in the atlas. Note that label ID corresponds to voxel intensity in the atlas file that can be downloaded from https://www.nitrc.org/projects/mouselemuratlas. Template of the mouse lemur brain compared to probability maps and a representative image from a single animal. Scale bar: 5 mm.

Experimental design, materials and methods

Animals

34 young to middle-aged adult mouse lemurs (22 males and 12 females) were used. Age range was 15–58 months, mean ± standard deviation 36.8 ± 9.2 months. Demographic information for these animals is provided in Table 1. The protocol was approved by the local ethics committee CEtEA-CEA DSV IdF (authorizations 201506051 736524 VI (APAFIS#778)) and followed the recommendations of the European Communities Council directive (2010/63/EU).

MR acquisition

One T2-weighted in vivo MRI scan was recorded for each animal. Animals were anesthetized by isoflurane (4% induction, 1–1.5% maintenance). Images were recorded using a 2D T2-weighted fast spin echo sequence (7 T Agilent system) using a four channel phased-array surface coil (Rapid Biomedical, Rimpar, Germany) actively decoupled from the transmitting birdcage probe (Rapid Biomedical, Rimpar, Germany), resolution 230 × 230 × 230 µm, TR/TE = 10,000/17.4 ms, RARE factor = 4, field of view (FOV) = 29.44 × 29.44 mm with a matrix (Mtx) = 128 × 128, 128 slices, number of averages (NA) = 6, acquisition duration 32 min.

Creation of the template

MR images from the 34 mouse lemurs were upsampled to 115 µm isotropic resolution. The template was generated using the function anats_to_common available within the sammba-mri python module (https://sammba-mri.github.io/generated/sammba.registration.anats_to_common.html#sammba.registration.anats_to_common). Most steps used tools from freely available AFNI software (https://afni.nimh.nih.gov/ [2], except for brain extraction which was done with RATS [3], [4]. First, head images were bias corrected. In a second step the brains were extracted and individual brain extracted image centers were shifted to the brain center of mass. Brains were then all rigid body aligned to a previous histological atlas of the mouse lemur brain [5] and the transform was then applied to the original heads. A first brain template (Template 1) was produced by averaging the aligned heads. A second template (Template 2) was created by using the previous rigid body registration step a second time to align the 34 centered brains to the first template. A third template (Template 3) was created by affine aligning the 34 centered brains to Template 2. A final template (Template 4) was created by executing four cycles of non-linear registration: the first one to affine Template 3, the other ones to templates of heads from the previous non-linear cycle, including initialization using the concatenated transforms of the previous cycles. Corrections for systematic biases in the non-linear transforms were applied after each cycle.

Segmentation of the MRI-based atlas

The template image was up-sampled to 91 µm isotropic resolution, then brain structures manually segmented in ITK-SNAP (http://www.itksnap.org [6];) according to published histological atlases [5], [7], [8]. Each structure was iteratively segmented slice by slice along the coronal, axial and sagittal orientations until the three-dimensional representation of the labelled structure was found to be smooth and non-jagged. Each structure was outlined bilaterally. In total, 120 regions including 40 cortical, 74 subcortical and 6 CSF regions were drawn (Fig. 1, labels of brain regions provided in Table 2). The names of the structures were based on the NeuroName ontology (http://www.braininfo.org [9]).

Tissue probability maps

Tissue probability maps that can be used for brain morphometry analyses were created using SPM8 (www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm) with the SPMMouse toolbox (http://spmmouse.org) [10], [11]. MR images from the 34 animals of the study were registered to an SPM template of the mouse lemur brain [11]. Affine registration registered the images to control for different head positions, scanner geometry and overall brain size. Then unified segmentation iteratively warped the data whilst correcting for signal inhomogeneity. The images of the rigidly-aligned brains of each animal were then segmented using a k-means algorithm [12] with 4 segments: background, GM, WM, and CSF. These maps were then averaged across individuals separately for each tissue type to produce mean GM, WM and CSF tissue probability maps. These probabilistic maps were manually edited to correct for mislabeling of CSF as GM or WM voxels due to partial volume effects, in particular around edges of the brain. They were also masked using masks derived from the segmented atlas, to conserve only brain and CSF structures (Fig. 2).
Subject areaNeuroscience
More specific subject areaMouse lemur (Microcebus murinus) brain, MRI atlas
Type of dataTemplate, atlas and probabilistic maps for the mouse lemur brain
Figure of the brain template and atlas.
Figure of probabilistic maps for the mouse lemur brain
Table of animals used for template creation
Table with the list of segmented regions
How data was acquiredin vivo 7T MRI (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA)
Template created with Sammba-MRI (https://sammba-mri.github.io).
Atlas created using ITK-SNAP (http://www.itksnap.org)
Probabilistic atlas created using SPM8 (www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm) with the SPMMouse toolbox (http://spmmouse.org)
Data formatAnalyzed (NIfTI-1 format)
Experimental factors34 mouse lemurs (22 males and 12 females; age range 15–58 months)
Experimental features

A brain template was constructed from T2-weighted images of 34 mouse lemurs.

The template was segmented into 120 regions that covered the whole brain.

A probabilistic atlas was created from the initial brain template.

Data source locationFontenay-aux-Roses, France
Data accessibilityData is with this article and available at NITRC:
https://www.nitrc.org/projects/mouselemuratlas
Related research articleN.A. Nadkarni, S. Bougacha, C. Garin, M. Dhenain, J.L. Picq, A 3D population-based brain atlas of the mouse lemur primate with examples of applications in aging studies and comparative anatomy. NeuroImage, In press [1].
  10 in total

1.  LOGISMOS--layered optimal graph image segmentation of multiple objects and surfaces: cartilage segmentation in the knee joint.

Authors:  Yin Yin; Xiangmin Zhang; Rachel Williams; Xiaodong Wu; Donald D Anderson; Milan Sonka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability.

Authors:  Paul A Yushkevich; Joseph Piven; Heather Cody Hazlett; Rachel Gimpel Smith; Sean Ho; James C Gee; Guido Gerig
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages.

Authors:  R W Cox
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1996-06

4.  A stereotaxic atlas of the grey lesser mouse lemur brain (Microcebus murinus).

Authors:  N Bons; S Silhol; V Barbié; N Mestre-Francés; D Albe-Fessard
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  A 3D population-based brain atlas of the mouse lemur primate with examples of applications in aging studies and comparative anatomy.

Authors:  Nachiket A Nadkarni; Salma Bougacha; Clément Garin; Marc Dhenain; Jean-Luc Picq
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  A quantitative approach to cytoarchitectonics. V. The areal pattern of the cortex of microcebus murinus (E. Geoffroy 1828), (Lemuridae, primates).

Authors:  K Zilles; G Rehkämper; A Schleicher
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  1979

7.  NeuroNames: an ontology for the BrainInfo portal to neuroscience on the web.

Authors:  Douglas M Bowden; Evan Song; Julia Kosheleva; Mark F Dubach
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2012-01

8.  RATS: Rapid Automatic Tissue Segmentation in rodent brain MRI.

Authors:  Ipek Oguz; Honghai Zhang; Ashley Rumple; Milan Sonka
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Voxel-based morphometry with templates and validation in a mouse model of Huntington's disease.

Authors:  Stephen J Sawiak; Nigel I Wood; Guy B Williams; A Jennifer Morton; T Adrian Carpenter
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  Voxel-based morphometry analyses of in vivo MRI in the aging mouse lemur primate.

Authors:  Stephen J Sawiak; Jean-Luc Picq; Marc Dhenain
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 5.750

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Evolution of Brain Connections: Integrating Diffusion MR Tractography With Gene Expression Highlights Increased Corticocortical Projections in Primates.

Authors:  Christine J Charvet; Arthi Palani; Priya Kabaria; Emi Takahashi
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  Age-related decline in executive function as a hallmark of cognitive ageing in primates: an overview of cognitive and neurobiological studies.

Authors:  Agnès Lacreuse; Naftali Raz; Daniel Schmidtke; William D Hopkins; James G Herndon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Animal Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Trends and Path Toward Standardization.

Authors:  Francesca Mandino; Domenic H Cerri; Clement M Garin; Milou Straathof; Geralda A F van Tilborg; M Mallar Chakravarty; Marc Dhenain; Rick M Dijkhuizen; Alessandro Gozzi; Andreas Hess; Shella D Keilholz; Jason P Lerch; Yen-Yu Ian Shih; Joanes Grandjean
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 4.081

Review 4.  Strengths and Weaknesses of the Gray Mouse Lemur (Microcebus murinus) as a Model for the Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms of Dementia.

Authors:  Fabien Pifferi; Jacques Epelbaum; Fabienne Aujard
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 5.810

5.  Sammba-MRI: A Library for Processing SmAll-MaMmal BrAin MRI Data in Python.

Authors:  Marina Celestine; Nachiket A Nadkarni; Clément M Garin; Salma Bougacha; Marc Dhenain
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 4.081

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.