| Literature DB >> 30455644 |
Jie Zhu1, Ruiwen Wang1, Ting Xu1, Shuai Zhang1, Yan Zhao1, Zhenlu Li2, Chao Wang3, Junjun Zhou1, Dongyan Gao1, Yan Hu4, Xiaofeng Tian2, Jihong Yao1.
Abstract
Background: Endoplasmic reticulum stress (EREntities:
Keywords: ER stress response; HSF1; SIRT1; liver fibrosis; salvianolic acid A
Year: 2018 PMID: 30455644 PMCID: PMC6230567 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01277
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
FIGURE 1SalA diminishes BDL-induced liver injury and hepatic fibrosis. (A,B) Serum levels of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). (C) Serum Tbil. The results are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 8). ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. the control group, #P < 0.05 vs. the BDL group, ##P < 0.01 vs. the BDL group. (D,E) HE staining and Masson’s trichrome staining of liver sections from the experimental groups: a, control; b, control + SalA (20 mg/kg); c, BDL; d, BDL + SalA (10 mg/kg) and e, BDL + SalA (20 mg/kg). HE-stained sections were photographed at 100× magnification, and Masson-stained sections were photographed at 200× magnification. Fibrotic rate represents the ratio of the Masson’s positive area to the total examined area. The results are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 8). ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. the control group, ##P < 0.01 vs. the BDL group.
FIGURE 2SalA suppresses BDL-induced liver fibrosis and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response in vivo. (A,B) Western blot analysis of phosphorylated PERK (P-PERK), PERK, phosphorylated IRE-1 α (P-IRE-1 α), IRE-1 α, transcription factor 6 (ATF6), GRP78, COL1A2 and α-SMA in the rat livers. The results are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05 vs. the control group, ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. the control group, #P < 0.05 vs. the BDL group, ##P < 0.01 vs. the BDL group.
FIGURE 3SalA alleviates liver fibrosis by suppressing ER stress in vitro. (A–D) LX2 cells were exposed to 20 ng/ml of PDGF-BB with 25 μM of SalA or 2.5 μg/ml of Tunicamycin or 30 μM of salubrinal for 24 h. The protein levels of GRP78, ATF4, COL1A2 and α-SMA were evaluated by Western blotting. The results are presented asthe mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05 vs. the control group, ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. the control group, #P < 0.05 vs. the PDGF-BB group, ##P < 0.01 vs. the PDGF-BB group.
FIGURE 4Effects of SalA on SIRT1 protein expression in vivo and in vitro. (A) Western blot analysis of the hepatic SIRT1 protein level in rats. The results are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. the control group, #P < 0.05 vs. the BDL group, ##P < 0.01 vs. the BDL group. (B) LX2 cells were transfected with control siRNA or SIRT1 siRNA, and the transfected cells were exposed to 25 μM of SalA for 24 h. The SIRT1 protein level was then measured by Western blotting. The results are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. the control group. (C) LX2 cells were pretreated with 10 μM of EX527 for 6 h before being exposed to 25 μM of SalA and/or 20 ng/ml of PDGF-BB. The protein level of SIRT1 was evaluated by Western blotting. The results are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. the control group, ##P < 0.05 vs. the PDGF-BB group, &&P < 0.01 vs. the PDGF-BB group treated with 25 μM of SalA.
FIGURE 5SalA mediates protection against BDL- and PDGF-BB-induced hepatic fibrosis and ER stress through SIRT1 up-regulation. LX2 cells were pretreated with 10 μM of EX527 for6 h before being exposed to 25 μM of SalA and/or 20 ng/ml of PDGF-BB. (A,B) Western blot analysis of the levels of phosphorylated PERK (P-PERK), PERK, phosphorylated IRE-1 α (P-IRE-1 α), IRE-1 α, transcription factor 6 (ATF6), GRP78, COL1A2 and α-SMA. The results are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05 vs. the control group, ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. the control group,#P < 0.05 vs. the PDGF-BB group, ##P < 0.01 vs. the PDGF-BB group, &&P < 0.01 vs. the PDGF-BB group treated with 25 μM of SalA.
FIGURE 6SalA-mediated protection is related to HSF1 up-regulation. LX2 cells were transfected with HSF1 siRNA or HSF1, and the transfectedcells were exposed to 20 ng/ml of PDGF-BB for 24 h. (A) The HSF1 protein level was then measured by Western blotting. The results are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. the control group, ##P < 0.01 vs. the PDGF-BB group. (B,C) Western blot analysis of the protein levels of phosphorylated PERK (P-PERK), PERK, phosphorylated IRE-1 α (P-IRE-1 α), IRE-1 α, transcription factor 6 (ATF6), GRP78, COL1A2 and α-SMA. The results are presented asthe mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05 vs. the control group, ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. the control group, #P < 0.05 vs. the PDGF-BB group, ##P < 0.01 vs. the PDGF-BB group.
FIGURE 7SalA-mediated protection depends on SIRT1 targeting HSF1 for deacetylation. (A) Western blot analysis of the protein levels of HSF1and ace-HSF1 in the rat livers. The results are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. the control group, ##P < 0.01 vs. the BDL group. (B) LX2 cells were transfected with control siRNA or SIRT1 siRNA, and the transfected cells were exposed to 25 μM of SalA for 24 h. HSF1and ace-HSF1 levels were then measured by Western blotting. The results are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05 vs. the control group, ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. the control group. (C) LX2 cells were pretreated with 10 μM of EX527 for 6 h before being exposed to 25 μM of SalA and/or 20 ng/ml of PDGF-BB. Western blot analysis of the protein levels of HSF1and ace-HSF1. The results are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. the control group, #P < 0.05 vs. the PDGF-BB group, ##P < 0.01 vs. the PDGF-BB group, &&P < 0.01 vs. the PDGF-BB group treated with 25 μM of SalA. (D) Western blot analysis of the protein level of HSP27 in the rat livers. The results are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. the control group, ##P < 0.01 vs. the BDL group. (E) LX2 cells were pretreated with 10 μM of EX527 for 6 h before being exposed to 25 μM of SalA and/or 20 ng/ml of PDGF-BB. Western blot analysis of the protein level of Hsp27. The results are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗∗P < 0.01 vs. the control group, ##P < 0.01 vs. the PDGF-BB group, &&P < 0.01 vs. the PDGF-BB group treated with 25 μM of SalA.