Literature DB >> 30455505

Intraspecific variation in cue-specific learning in sticklebacks.

Miles K Bensky1, Alison M Bell1,2.   

Abstract

Animals must identify reliable cues amidst environmental noise during learning, and the cues that are most reliable often depend on the local ecology. Comparing the performance of populations of the same species across multiple versions of a cognitive task can reveal whether some populations learn to use certain cues faster than others. Here, using a criterion-based protocol, we assessed whether two natural populations of sticklebacks differed in how quickly they learned to associate two different discrimination cues with the location of food. One version of the discrimination task required animals to use visual (colour) cues while the other required animals to use egocentric (side) cues. There were significant behavioural differences between the two populations, but no evidence that one population was generally better at learning, or that one version of the task was generally harder than the other. However, the two populations excelled on different tasks: fish from one population performed significantly better on the side version than they did on the colour version, while the opposite was observed in the other population. These results suggest that the two populations are equally capable of discrimination learning, but are primed to form associations with different cues. Ecological differences between the populations in environmental stability might account for the observed variation in learning. These findings highlight the value of comparing cognitive performance on different variations of the same task in order to understand variation in cognitive mechanisms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cue-specific learning; learning; population differences; threespine stickleback

Year:  2018        PMID: 30455505      PMCID: PMC6239167          DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  18 in total

1.  The validity of three tests of temperament in guppies (Poecilia reticulata).

Authors:  James G Burns
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.231

2.  Population genetic structure and its implications for adaptive variation in memory and the hippocampus on a continental scale in food-caching black-capped chickadees.

Authors:  V V Pravosudov; T C Roth; M L Forister; L D Ladage; T M Burg; M J Braun; B S Davidson
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Testing the predictions of coping styles theory in threespined sticklebacks.

Authors:  Miles K Bensky; Ryan Paitz; Laura Pereira; Alison M Bell
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Variation in memory and the hippocampus across populations from different climates: a common garden approach.

Authors:  Timothy C Roth; Lara D LaDage; Cody A Freas; Vladimir V Pravosudov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Effect of maternal predator exposure on the ability of stickleback offspring to generalize a learned colour-reward association.

Authors:  Sally Feng; Katie E McGhee; Alison M Bell
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Hippocampal lesions impair memory for location but not color in passerine birds.

Authors:  R R Hampton; S J Shettleworth
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  A test of the adaptive specialization hypothesis: population differences in caching, memory, and the hippocampus in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapilla).

Authors:  Vladimir V Pravosudov; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 8.  A blueprint for vocal learning: auditory predispositions from brains to genomes.

Authors:  David Wheatcroft; Anna Qvarnström
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Serial reversal learning and the evolution of behavioral flexibility in three species of North American corvids (Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus, Nucifraga columbiana, Aphelocoma californica).

Authors:  Alan B Bond; Alan C Kamil; Russell P Balda
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Coping with uncertainty: woodpecker finches (Cactospiza pallida) from an unpredictable habitat are more flexible than birds from a stable habitat.

Authors:  Sabine Tebbich; Irmgard Teschke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Do male sticklebacks use visual and/or olfactory cues to assess a potential mate's history with predation risk?

Authors:  Marion Dellinger; Weiran Zhang; Alison M Bell; Jennifer K Hellmann
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  How Inhibitory Control Relates to Positive and Negative Affective States in Red Junglefowl.

Authors:  Laura Clare Garnham; Charlie Clarke; Hanne Løvlie
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-08

3.  Variation in inhibitory control does not influence social rank, foraging efficiency, or risk taking, in red junglefowl females.

Authors:  Laura Clare Garnham; Robert Boddington; Hanne Løvlie
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 2.899

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.