Elise L Gilbertson1, Rathika Krishnasamy1, Celine Foote2, Alice L Kennard3, Meg J Jardine2, Nicholas A Gray4. 1. Department of Nephrology, Sunshine Coast Clinical School, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Queensland; The University of Queensland, Sunshine Coast Clinical School, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Queensland. 2. The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Concord and Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia. 3. Department of Nephrology, Sunshine Coast Clinical School, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Queensland. 4. Department of Nephrology, Sunshine Coast Clinical School, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Queensland; The University of Queensland, Sunshine Coast Clinical School, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Queensland. Electronic address: nicholas.gray@health.qld.gov.au.
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Dialysis is a burdensome and complex treatment for which many recipients require support from caregivers. The impact of caring for people dependent on dialysis on the quality of life of the caregivers has been incompletely characterized. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of quantitative studies of quality of life and burden to caregivers. SETTING & STUDY POPULATION: Caregivers of adults receiving maintenance dialysis. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES: The Cochrane Library, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, PubMed, and MEDLINE were systematically searched from inception until December 2016 for quantitative studies of caregivers. Pediatric and non-English language studies were excluded. Study quality was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale. DATA EXTRACTION: 2 independent reviewers selected studies and extracted data using a prespecified extraction instrument. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Descriptive reports of demographics, measurement scales, and outcomes. Quantitative meta-analysis using random effects when possible. RESULTS: 61 studies were identified that included 5,367 caregivers from 21 countries and assessed the impact on caregivers using 70 different scales. Most (85%) studies were cross-sectional. The largest identified group of caregivers was female spouses who cared for recipients of facility-based hemodialysis (72.3%) or peritoneal dialysis (20.6%). Caregiver quality of life was poorer than in the general population, mostly comparable with caregivers of people with other chronic diseases, and often better than experienced by the dialysis patients cared for. Caregiver quality of life was comparable across dialysis modalities. LIMITATIONS: Heterogeneity in study design and outcome measures made comparisons between studies difficult and precluded quantitative meta-analysis. Study quality was generally poor. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life of caregivers of dialysis recipients is poorer than in the general population and comparable to that of caregivers of individuals with other chronic diseases. The impact of caring for recipients of home hemodialysis or changes in the impact of caring over time have not been well studied. Further research is needed to optimally inform dialysis programs how to educate and support caregivers.
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Dialysis is a burdensome and complex treatment for which many recipients require support from caregivers. The impact of caring for people dependent on dialysis on the quality of life of the caregivers has been incompletely characterized. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of quantitative studies of quality of life and burden to caregivers. SETTING & STUDY POPULATION: Caregivers of adults receiving maintenance dialysis. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES: The Cochrane Library, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, PubMed, and MEDLINE were systematically searched from inception until December 2016 for quantitative studies of caregivers. Pediatric and non-English language studies were excluded. Study quality was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale. DATA EXTRACTION: 2 independent reviewers selected studies and extracted data using a prespecified extraction instrument. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Descriptive reports of demographics, measurement scales, and outcomes. Quantitative meta-analysis using random effects when possible. RESULTS: 61 studies were identified that included 5,367 caregivers from 21 countries and assessed the impact on caregivers using 70 different scales. Most (85%) studies were cross-sectional. The largest identified group of caregivers was female spouses who cared for recipients of facility-based hemodialysis (72.3%) or peritoneal dialysis (20.6%). Caregiver quality of life was poorer than in the general population, mostly comparable with caregivers of people with other chronic diseases, and often better than experienced by the dialysis patients cared for. Caregiver quality of life was comparable across dialysis modalities. LIMITATIONS: Heterogeneity in study design and outcome measures made comparisons between studies difficult and precluded quantitative meta-analysis. Study quality was generally poor. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life of caregivers of dialysis recipients is poorer than in the general population and comparable to that of caregivers of individuals with other chronic diseases. The impact of caring for recipients of home hemodialysis or changes in the impact of caring over time have not been well studied. Further research is needed to optimally inform dialysis programs how to educate and support caregivers.
Authors: Laura Sola; Nathan W Levin; David W Johnson; Roberto Pecoits-Filho; Harith M Aljubori; Yuqing Chen; Stefaan Claus; Allan Collins; Brett Cullis; John Feehally; Paul N Harden; Mohamed H Hassan; Fuad Ibhais; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Adeera Levin; Abdulkarim Saleh; Daneil Schneditz; Irma Tchokhonelidze; Rumeyza Turan Kazancioglu; Ahmed Twahir; Robert Walker; Anthony J O Were; Xueqing Yu; Fredric O Finkelstein Journal: Kidney Int Suppl (2011) Date: 2020-02-19
Authors: Christine K Liu; Janet Seo; Dayeun Lee; Kristen Wright; Manjula Kurella Tamura; Jennifer A Moye; Jonathan F Bean; Daniel E Weiner Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2021-08-20 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Sarah E Van Pilsum Rasmussen; Ann Eno; Mary G Bowring; Romi Lifshitz; Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang; Fawaz Al Ammary; Daniel C Brennan; Allan B Massie; Dorry L Segev; Macey L Henderson Journal: Transplant Direct Date: 2020-06-08
Authors: Melissa Nataatmadja; Rathika Krishnasamy; Li Zuo; Daqing Hong; Brendan Smyth; Min Jun; Janak R de Zoysa; Kirsten Howard; Jing Wang; Chunlai Lu; Zhangsuo Liu; Christopher T Chan; Alan Cass; Vlado Perkovic; Meg Jardine; Nicholas A Gray Journal: Kidney Int Rep Date: 2021-02-01