| Literature DB >> 30453600 |
Julio Bastos-Arrieta1,2, Antonio Florido3,4, Clara Pérez-Ràfols5, Núria Serrano6, Núria Fiol7, Jordi Poch8, Isabel Villaescusa9.
Abstract
The chemical synthesis of silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) by using an environmentally friendly methodology for their preparation is presented. Thus, considering that plants possess components that can act as reducing agents and stabilizers in nanoparticles' production, the synthesis of Ag-NPs by using an extract aqueous solution of grape stalk waste as a reducing and capping agent is studied. First, the total polyphenols and reducing sugars contained in the produced extracts at different conditions are characterized. After that, Ag-NPs are synthesized regarding the interaction of Ag ions (from silver nitrate) and the grape stalk extract. The effect of temperature, contact time, extract/metal solution volume ratio and pH solution in the synthesis of metal nanoparticles are also studied. Different sets of nanoparticle samples are characterized by means of Electron Microscopy coupled with Energy Dispersive X-Ray for qualitative chemical identification. Ag-NPs with an average diameter of 27.7 ± 0.6 nm are selected to proof their suitability for sensing purposes. Finally, screen-printed electrodes modified with Ag-NPs are tested for the simultaneous stripping voltammetric determination of Pb(II) and Cd(II). Results indicate good reproducibility, sensitivity and limits of detection around 2.7 µg L-1 for both metal ions.Entities:
Keywords: grape stalk; green synthesis; metal analysis; screen-printed electrodes; silver nanoparticles; voltammetry
Year: 2018 PMID: 30453600 PMCID: PMC6266962 DOI: 10.3390/nano8110946
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1BP for the concentration of polyphenols at different temperatures (A) and contact times (B).
Figure 2FTIR spectrum of dried grape stalks extract before and after the synthesis of Ag-NPs.
Figure 3UV/Vis Spectra showing the influence of different parameters in the synthesis of Ag-NPs with the GS extract: (A) pH, (B) contact time and (C) extract addition.
Figure 4Electron Microscopy micrographs for Ag-NPs synthesized at pH 4 using the GS extract as reducing agent. SEM micrograph (A), corresponding EDX spectra (B) and TEM micrograph (C) with corresponding EDX spectra (D) showing the presence of silver. STEM image of Ag-NPs (E) with size distribution histogram (F).
Diameter measurements of the Ag-NPs prepared at different pH obtained from TEM micrographs.
| Sample Preparation pH | Diameter (nm) |
|---|---|
| 2 | 55.4 ± 0.3 |
| 4 | 27.7 ± 0.6 |
| 6 | 54.3 ± 0.1 |
| 8 | 9.0 ± 0.2 |
Figure 5SEM InLens images of raw SPCNFE (A) and SPCNFE after the drop casting of Ag-NPs (B). SEM Secondary Lens of SPCNFE highlighting the location of the drop-casted Ag-NPs (C).
Figure 6Stripping voltammetric measurements of the SPCNFE modified with Ag-NPs obtained from different synthesis pH conditions and washing suspensions for the simultaneous detection of Cd(II) and Pb(II) at 77 µg L−1 and pH 4.5.
Figure 7DPASV measurements and calibration curves (insets) obtained for the simultaneous calibration of Pb(II) and Cd(II) in acetate buffer pH 4.5 using an Ag-NPs modified -SPCNFE at an Ed of −1.4 V and a td of 120 s.
Calibration data for the simultaneous determination of Pb(II) and Cd(II) at each Ag-NPs-SPCNFE at Ed of −1.4 V, td of 120 s and pH 4.5. Standard deviations are denoted by parenthesis.
| Sample | Analytical Parameter | DPASV Calibration | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pb(II) | Cd(II) | ||
| SPCNFE—pH4.W3 | Sensitivity (nA µg−1 L) | 62 (1) | 46 (2) |
| R2 | 0.998 | 0.993 | |
| Linear range a (µg L−1) | 8.9–100.4 | 9.5–39.7 | |
| LOD (µg L−1) | 2.7 | 2.8 | |
| SPCNFE—pH4.W4 | Sensitivity (nA µg−1 L) | 26.0 (0.7) | 8.5 (0.5) |
| R2 | 0.996 | 0.993 | |
| Linear range a (µg L−1) | 13.3–100.4 | 16.0–39.7 | |
| LOD (µg L−1) | 4.0 | 4.8 | |
| SPCNFE—pH6.W3 | Sensitivity (nA µg−1 L) | 21.2 (0.5) | 5.1 (0.5) |
| R2 | 0.996 | 0.980 | |
| Linear range a (µg L−1) | 12.3–100.4 | 26.9–39.7 | |
| LOD (µg L−1) | 3.7 | 8.1 | |
| SPCNFE—pH6.W4 | Sensitivity (nA µg−1 L) | 43 (1) | 13.8 (0.8) |
| R2 | 0.993 | 0.989 | |
| Linear range a (µg L−1) | 16.2–100.4 | 10.0–27.5 | |
| LOD (µg L−1) | 4.9 | 3.0 | |
a The lowest value of the linear range was considered from the LOQ.