Literature DB >> 30453563

Sensitive Hg2+ Sensing via Quenching the Fluorescence of the Complex between Polythymine and 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(N-methyl-4-pyridyl) Porphyrin (TMPyP).

Daohong Wu1, Yaliang Huang2, Shengqiang Hu3, Xinyao Yi4, Jianxiu Wang5.   

Abstract

The interaction between polythymine (dTn) and 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(N-methyl-4-pyridyl) porphyrin (TMPyP) was systematically studied using various techniques. dTn remarkably enhanced the fluorescence intensity of TMPyP as compared to other oligonucleotides. The enhanced fluorescence intensity and the shift of the emission peaks were ascribed to the formation of a π-π complex between TMPyP and dTn. And the quenching of the dTn-enhanced fluorescence by Hg2+ through a synergistic effect occurs due to the heavy atom effect. The binding of Hg2+ to TMPyP plays an important role in the Hg-TMPyP-dT30 ternary complex formation. A TMPyP-dT30-based Hg2+ sensor was developed with a dynamic range of Hg2+ from 5 nM to 100 nM. The detection limit of 1.3 nM was low enough for Hg2+ determination. The sensor also exhibited good selectivity against other metal ions. Experiments for tap water and river water demonstrated that the detection method was applicable for Hg2+ determination in real samples. The Hg2+ sensor based on oligonucleotide dT30-enhanced TMPyP fluorescence was fast and low-cost, presenting a promising platform for practical Hg2+ determination.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hg2+; TMPyP; interaction; polythymine; synergistic effect; ternary complex

Year:  2018        PMID: 30453563      PMCID: PMC6263993          DOI: 10.3390/s18113998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sensors (Basel)        ISSN: 1424-8220            Impact factor:   3.576


1. Introduction

As one of the most important conjugated organic molecules, porphyrins play a crucial role in the metabolism of living organisms [1]. For example, porphyrins are responsible for the production of singlet oxygen, which could damage DNA in tumor cells [2]. The interaction between porphyrins or their derivatives and nucleic acids has been extensively investigated [3,4,5], in which three binding types including intercalation, external or groove binding, and outside stacking were involved [6]. 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(N-methyl-4-pyridyl)porphyrin (TMPyP) is a water-soluble cationic porphyrin, which contains a porphyrin core and N-methylpyridinium side chains [7]. Due to their planarity and hydrophobicity, the porphyrin rings can intercalate into the base pairs of DNA and in the same time, the positively charged side chains can electrostatically interact with the negatively charged nucleic acids [8]. For example, evidenced by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, TMPyP can intercalate into GC-rich regions of duplex DNA [9,10]. However, the binding of TMPyP to the major groove of the AT-rich regions has also been proposed [11]. TMPyP has been reported to interact with triplex DNA, in which the third strand could inhibit the assembly of TMPyP with duplex DNA [12]. TMPyP can also bind to the G-quadruplex structure through external stacking rather than intercalation between the G-tetrads [13,14,15]. As probably the most flexible form, the single stranded DNA enables unrivaled access to individual bases [6], which facilitates the interaction with TMPyP. Mercuric ion (Hg2+) possesses serious immunotoxic, genotoxic, and neurotoxic effects, causing damage to the central nervous system, endocrine system and other organs such as the kidney, liver, heart, and lung [16]. Hg2+ usually serves as a fluorescent quencher through enhancement of spin-orbit coupling [17]. A colorimetric method for Hg2+ determination through platinum nanoparticles with limit of detection 8.5 pM and a linear range from 0.01 to 4 nM has been reported by Aragay et al. [18]. MoS2 nanosheet/DNA/carbon dot-based fluorescence method has been reported to detect Hg2+ [19]. However, most of the methods were based on synthesized nanometer materials such as nanoparticle, quantum dots, nanosheet, which were hard to be modified. Herein, the interaction between TMPyP and polyadenine (dAn), polycytosine (dCn), polyguanine (dGn) and polythymine (dTn) were investigated. dTn was found to substantially enhance the fluorescence intensity of TMPyP due to the formation of a TMPyP-dTn complex. The incorporation of Hg2+ significantly quenched the fluorescence of the complex and a fluorescent sensor for Hg2+ was developed. The sensing strategy is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Schematic of Hg2+ assay by quenching the fluorescence of TMPyP-dT30.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents and Chemicals

5,10,15,20-tetrakis(N-methyl-4-pyridyl)porphyrin (TMPyP) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The oligonucleotides (ODNs), such as polyadenine dA13, polycytosine dC13, polyguanine dG6TG6 and polythymine dT5, dT10, dT13, dT15, dT20, dT30, dT40, dT50 were synthesized by Sangon Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Hg(NO3)2, Cd(NO3)2·4H2O, Cr(NO3)3·9H2O, Cu(NO3)2·3H2O, Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, FeSO4·7H2O, Mn(CH3COO)2·4H2O, MgCl2·6H2O, NiCl2·6H2O, Pb(NO3)2, ZnCl2, Tris-HCl, CH3COOH, NaCl and NaOH were acquired from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All the ODNs were prepared with Tris-HCl buffer (10 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.4). All reagents were of analytical grade and used as received. Ultrapure water was obtained from a Millipore water purification system (≥18 MΩ, Milli-Q, Millipore).

2.2. Apparatus

UV-vis spectra and circular dichroism (CD) spectra were recorded on a UV-2450 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan) and a Jasco-815 spectropolarimeter (Jasco, Japan), respectively. Fluorescence spectra were collected on a Hitachi F-4600 spectrofluorometer (Hitachi, Japan). Fluorescence lifetime was measured on a compact FluoTime 100 fluorescence lifetime spectrometer (PicoQuant GmbH, Germany).

2.3. Procedure

The TMPyP-ODN complex was formed by mixing 1 μM TMPyP and 2 μM ODN, followed by dilution to 200 μL with Tris-HCl buffer and stirring for 50 min. For the Hg2+ assay, Hg2+ with various concentrations was added into the solution of TMPyP-dT30 complex under stirring for 1 min. For the fluorescence, measurement with excitation was 422 nm and emission was at 660 nm. The fluorescence lifetimes were determined from the data obtained from a compact FluoTime 100 fluorescence lifetime spectrometer. The data could be analyzed by exponential fits. The solution of Hg2+, TMPyP and dT30 were mixed by 1 μM Hg2+ and 1 μM TMPyP for Hg-TMPyP; 1 μM TMPyP and 2 μM dT30 for TMPyP-dT30; 1 μM Hg2+, 1 μM TMPyP and 2 μM dT30 for Hg-TMPyP-dT30. The solutions were followed by dilution to 200 μL with Tris-HCl buffer and stirring for 120 min. All the lifetime measurements were with an excitation at 422 nm.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Interaction between ODNs and TMPyP

The interaction between TMPyP and ODNs was characterized by fluorescence and UV-vis absorption spectroscopy. As shown in Figure 2A, upon excitation at 422 nm, TMPyP exhibited two broad peaks at around 665 nm and 715 nm (curve a). With the addition of dG6TG6, the fluorescence of TMPyP decreased due to the electron transfer from guanine to TMPyP (curve b) [20]. However, the incorporation of dA13 (curve c), dC13 (curve d) and dT13 (curve e) increased the fluorescence of TMPyP, and the emission wavelengths were shifted to 660 nm and 720 nm. The enhanced fluorescence intensity and the shift of the emission peaks were ascribed to the formation of a π-π complex between TMPyP and ODNs [20]. The above results were consistent with those in the cases of mononucleotides. Mononucleotides interacted differently with TMPyP, in which adenine, thymine, and cytosine increased the fluorescence intensity of TMPyP, while guanine substantially quenched the fluorescence intensity of TMPyP [20]. The higher fluorescence of TMPyP by dT13 than that by dA13 or dC13 indicated that TMPyP binded to dT13 with stronger affinity [21].
Figure 2

(A) Fluorescence and (B) UV-vis absorption spectra of 1.0 μM TMPyP in the (a) absence and (b) presence of 2.0 μM dG6TG6, (c) dA13, (d) dC13 or (e) dT13.

TMPyP displayed a characteristic absorption peak at 422 nm known as the Soret band (curve a in Figure 2B), which originated from the S0–S2 transition [22]. The incorporation of dG6TG6 (curve b), dA13 (curve c), dC13 (curve d) and dT13 (curve e) decreased the absorption of TMPyP, and the absorbance peak of TMPyP was red-shifted to 426 nm and 431 nm in the case of dC13 (curve d) and dT13 (curve e), respectively. The larger bathochromic shift in curve e suggested the higher binding affinity between TMPyP and dT13. The length of polythymine also influenced the fluorescence enhancement of TMPyP (Figure 3). The incorporation of different lengths of polythymine resulted in increased fluorescence and began to level off with the length of dT30. Thus, the length of dT30 might have been more favorable for π-π stacking between TMPyP and polythymine.
Figure 3

Dependence of fluorescence intensity on the sequence length of poly T. The fluorescence was excited at 422 nm and measured at 660 nm. The absolute errors deduced from three replicate measurements are shown as the error bars.

3.2. Fluorescence Quenching of TMPyP-dT30 Complex by Hg2+

In comparison with the fluorescence of TMPyP at 665 nm and 715 nm (curve a in Figure 4A), the fluorescence of the TMPyP-dT30 complex at 660 nm and 720 nm (curve b in Figure 4A) was significantly enhanced. With the addition of Hg2+, the fluorescence of the TMPyP-dT30 complex at 660 nm was greatly quenched and in the same time, a tiny and broad emission peak at 635 nm was attained (curve c). The emission peak at 635 nm was ascribed to that of Hg-TMPyP, as evidenced by the emission of Hg-TMPyP in curve d. Porphyrins have been reported to bind to Hg2+ with the formation of metalloporphyrin [23], and the fluorescence of porphyrins could be quenched by Hg2+ due to the heavy atom effect [24]. Based on the results above, a new ternary complex of Hg-TMPyP-dT30 might have formed [25], providing the possibility for a Hg2+ assay.
Figure 4

(A) Fluorescence and (B) UV-vis absorption spectra of (a) 1.0 μM TMPyP, (b) 1.0 μM TMPyP + 2.0 μM dT30, (c) 1.0 μM TMPyP + 2.0 μM dT30 + 4.0 μM Hg2+, (d) 1.0 μM TMPyP + 4.0 μM Hg2+. (C) CD spectra of (a) 20 μM dT30, (b) 20 μM dT30 + 100 μM TMPyP, (c) b + 100 μM Hg2+, (d) a + 100 μM Hg2+. (D) Fluorescence spectra of (a) 1.0 μM TMPyP + 2.0 μM dC30, (b) a + 4.0 μM Hg2+. The fluorescence was excited at 422 nm and measured at 660 nm.

To further demonstrate the formation of the ternary complex, UV-vis absorption spectra were investigated (Figure 4B). With the addition of dT30, the Soret band of TMPyP at 422 nm (curve a) was red-shifted to 431 nm (curve b). The electrostatic interaction and π-π stacking facilitated the formation of the TMPyP-dT30 complex [20]. The formation of the ternary complex of Hg-TMPyP-dT30 led to a larger bathochromic shift of the Soret band to 462 nm, and in the same time, a new and small peak appeared at 437 nm (curve c). The new peak originated from the absorption of Hg-TMPyP (curve d) [26]. The conformational change of dT30 induced by TMPyP was studied by CD measurements (Figure 4C). The dT30 exhibited a negative peak at 250 nm and a positive peak at 275 nm (curve a). Upon adding TMPyP to the solution of dT30, both peaks decreased slightly and in the same time, a new positive peak at 430 nm appeared (curve b), which indicated the binding of TMPyP to dT30 through π-π stacking [27,28]. Note that TMPyP did not show any detectable CD signal. With the incorporation of Hg2+ to the TMPyP-dT30 complex, the 275 nm-peak disappeared and the negative peak at 250 nm shifted to 260 nm (curve c). Furthermore, the 430 nm-peak disappeared. The results above suggested that the binding of TMPyP to dT30 was interrupted by Hg2+. Such an interruption might have been ascribed to the alteration of the planarity of the TMPyP core induced by Hg2+ [5]. When adding Hg2+ to dT30 solution, the formation of the T–Hg–T complex was characterized by the negative peak at 255 nm and the positive peak at 280 nm (curve d). No positive peak at 280 nm in curve c was shown compared to the T–Hg–T complex, which indicated the different structure of dT30 in T–Hg–T and the Hg-TMPyP-dT30 complex. The fluorescence lifetime measurement provided deep insight into the ternary complex formation. The lifetime of TMPyP determined from the decay curve was 4.6 ns, consistent with that reported previously [26]. The lifetime was increased to 10.2 ns upon formation of TMPyP-dT30. However, the ternary complex of Hg-TMPyP-dT30 possessed a much shorter lifetime of 2.0 ns. Upon adding Hg2+ to the solution of TMPyP, a lifetime of 1.2 ns was observed, indicating the binding of Hg2+ to TMPyP [26]. As reported previously, the binding of TMPyP to dT30 possessed high binding affinity (binding constant of 107 M−1), while the coordination of Hg2+ to dT30 was a slow dynamic process at low concentrations of Hg2+ [29]. The binding of Hg2+ to TMPyP plays an important role in the Hg-TMPyP-dT30 ternary complex formation. Upon addition of Hg2+ to the solution of TMPyP-dC30, the ternary complex of Hg-TMPyP-dC30 was also formed, as evidenced by the quenching of the fluorescence of TMPyP-dC30 by Hg2+ (Figure 4D). Considering the relatively lower affinity between Hg2+ and dC30 than that between Hg2+ and TMPyP [26,30], the coordination of Hg2+ to TMPyP was essential for the formation of the Hg-TMPyP-dC30 complex. The quenching of the fluorescence of TMPyP-dT30 by Hg2+ provided the possibility for a Hg2+ assay.

3.3. Calibration Curve of The Hg2+ Assay

The fluorescence intensity of TMPyP-dT30 at 660 nm gradually decreased with an increased Hg2+ concentration (Figure 5A). The dependence of (F0 − F)/F0 on the concentration of Hg2+ was shown in Figure 5B, where F0 and F represented the fluorescence intensities in the absence and presence of Hg2+, respectively. The inset of Figure 5B depicted the linear portion of the curve with Hg2+ concentrations ranging from 5 nM to 100 nM and the linear regression equation was presented as (F0 − F)/F0 = 3.22 [Hg2+] (μM) + 0.05 (R = 0.9605). The detection limit was estimated to be 1.3 nM, being much lower than those by the 8-amino BODIPY-based fluorescence assay (49 nM) [31], Raman spectroscopic method (10 nM) [32], colorimetric assay employing plasmonic gold nanoparticles (50 nM [33] and 17.3 nM [34]), colorimetric assay based on Cu2-xSe nanoparticles (2.7nM) [35] and the fluorescence polarization assay based on CdTe/CdS quantum dots (8.6 nM) [36]. Such a concentration level was also comparable with those by fluorescent assay based on phosphorothioate RNA modifications (1.7 nM) [37]. The comparison of the proposed sensor with other methods is shown in Table 1. Because the maximum permissible level of Hg2+ in drinking water and food, set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and World Health Organization, is at 2 ppb (10 nM) [38], the sensing protocol serves as a viable alternative for a practical Hg2+ assay.
Figure 5

(A) Fluorescence spectra of TMPyP-dT30 in the presence of Hg2+ with various concentrations: 0, 0.025, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 μM (from a to h). (B) Calibration curve for Hg2+ assay. F0 and F represent the fluorescence intensities in the absence and presence of Hg2+, respectively. The inset shows the linear portion of the curve with Hg2+ concentrations ranging from 5 nM to 100 nM. The vertical bars designate the standard deviation for the mean of three replicate measurements.

Table 1

A comparison of the proposed sensor with other detection methods.

MethodToolLinear RangeLODTimeReal SampleRef.
colorimetricplatinum nanoparticles0.01–4 nM0.0085 nM10 mintap water[18]
colorimetricgold nanoparticles25–750 nM50 nM40 minpond and river water[33]
colorimetricCu2-xSe nanoparticles0–800 nM2.7 nM10 mintap, pond and river water[35]
colorimetricgold nanoparticles and aptamer10–1000 nM17.3 nM20 mintap, rivers, lakes and ocean water[34]
Raman spectroscopysilver nanoparticles1–1000 μM10 nM30 mindrinking mineral water[32]
fluorescencePhosphorothioate RNA Modifications0–50 nM1.7 nM20 minlake water[37]
fluorescenceMoS2 nanosheet/DNA/carbon dot0–10 nM1.02 nM15 mintap and lake water[19]
fluorescencefluorescent 8-aminoBODIPY-based probe0.5–5 μM49 nM50 minSMMC-7721 cells[31]
fluorescence polarizationCdTe/CdS QDs10–800 nM8.6 nM2.0 hlake and spikedlake water[36]
fluorescencepolyT-TMPyP5–100 nM1.3 nM60 sTap and river waterthis work

3.4. Selectivity of the Assay

The selectivity of the method was evaluated by the addition of various metal ions of 4.0 µM (Figure 6). Hg2+ quenched about 90% of the fluorescence intensity of the TMPyP-dT30 complex at 660 nm. However, other metal ions, such as Cu2+, Fe3+, Fe2+, Cd2+, Cr3+, Mg2+, Mn2+ and Ni2+ exerted negligible influence on the fluorescence intensity of TMPyP-dT30. Pb2+ caused 30% quenching of the fluorescence intensity due to the formation of the unstable Pb2+-TMPyP-dT30 [39]. The proposed fluorescence method possessed good selectivity toward Hg2+ determination.
Figure 6

Selectivity of the fluorescence assay of Hg2+. The fluorescence intensity of TMPyP-dT30 was attained in the absence (Blank) and presence of 4.0 μM of Hg2+, Pb2+, Cu2+, Fe3+, Fe2+, Cd2+, Cr3+, Mg2+, Mn2+ or Ni2+. The vertical bars designate the standard deviation of the mean of three replicate measurements.

3.5. Practical Samples for the Hg2+ Assay

The practical application of this method for Hg2+ determination was evaluated by the standard addition method through adding different concentration of Hg2+ in tap water and river water. As shown in Table 2, the recoveries were between 96–105%. The recovery suggested that the method was largely free from the matrix effect of the complex real water samples and could be served for Hg2+ determination in tap water and river water.
Table 2

Determination of Hg2+ in water samples with the proposed method.

SampleAdded (nM)Measured (nM) aRecovery (%)
tap water2.02.1 ± 0.17105 ± 0.085
5.04.9 ± 0.3298 ± 0.064
10.09.6 ± 0.6296 ± 0.062
river water2.02.1 ± 0.11105 ± 0.055
5.05.1 ± 0.43102 ± 0.086
10.09.7 ± 0.6597 ± 0.065

Mean values and standard deviations were obtained from three independent experiments.

4. Conclusions

The fluorescence quenching capability of Hg2+ on the TMPyP-dT30 has been proposed, enabling a sensitive and selective Hg2+ assay. The formation of the Hg-TMPyP-dT30 ternary complex was characterized by various techniques. The mechanism inherent in the fluorescence quenching of TMPyP-dT30 by Hg2+ involved a synergistic effect. The detection limit of the proposed method was obtained as 1.3 nM. Experiments for tap water and river water demonstrated that the detection method was applicable for Hg2+ determination in real samples. The Hg2+ sensor based on oligonucleotide dT30-enhanced TMPyP fluorescence was fast and low-cost, presenting a promising platform for practical Hg2+ determination. In addition, this is the first time dT30 enhanced TMPyP fluorescence intensity was used for Hg2+ determination. The sensing protocol may provide useful information on the interaction among porphyrins, DNA and heavy metal ions.
  30 in total

1.  Porphyrin assembly on beta-cyclodextrin for selective sensing and detection of a zinc ion based on the dual emission fluorescence ratio.

Authors:  Ronghua Yang; Ke'an Li; Kemin Wang; Fenglin Zhao; Na Li; Feng Liu
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Binding of 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(N-methylpyridinium-4-yl)-21H,23H-porphyrin to an AT-rich region of a duplex DNA.

Authors:  Takako Ohyama; Hajime Mita; Yasuhiko Yamamoto
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  Porphyrins in analytical chemistry. A review.

Authors:  M Biesaga; K Pyrzyńska; M Trojanowicz
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2000-02-07       Impact factor: 6.057

4.  Citrate-capped platinum nanoparticle as a smart probe for ultrasensitive mercury sensing.

Authors:  Gang-Wei Wu; Shao-Bin He; Hua-Ping Peng; Hao-Hua Deng; Ai-Lin Liu; Xin-Hua Lin; Xing-Hua Xia; Wei Chen
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  A dual-mode turn-on fluorescent BODIPY-based probe for visualization of mercury ions in living cells.

Authors:  Yue Wang; Fuchao Pan; Yuanlin Zhang; Fangfang Peng; Zhentao Huang; Weijuan Zhang; Weili Zhao
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.616

6.  A porphyrin photosensitized metal-organic framework for cancer cell apoptosis and caspase responsive theranostics.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Jianping Lei; Fengjiao Ma; Pinghua Ling; Jintong Liu; Huangxian Ju
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  Highly sensitive and selective spectroscopic detection of mercury(II) in water by using pyridylporphyrin-DNA conjugates.

Authors:  Jung Kyu Choi; Gevorg Sargsyan; Amanda M Olive; Milan Balaz
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 5.236

8.  Molecular complexes of nucleosides and nucleotides with a monomeric cationic porphyrin and some of its metal derivatives.

Authors:  R F Pasternack; E J Gibbs; A Gaudemer; A Antebi; S Bassner; L De Poy; D H Turner; A Williams; F Laplace; M H Lansard; C Merienne; M Perree-Fauvet
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Vibrational and electronic circular dichroism study of the interactions of cationic porphyrins with (dG-dC)10 and (dA-dT)10.

Authors:  Jakub Nový; Marie Urbanová
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.505

10.  Internal versus external binding of cationic porphyrins to single-stranded DNA.

Authors:  Abby J Gaier; Srijana Ghimire; Sarah E Fix; David R McMillin
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 5.165

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Fluorescent Sensors for the Detection of Heavy Metal Ions in Aqueous Media.

Authors:  Nerea De Acha; César Elosúa; Jesús M Corres; Francisco J Arregui
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Photodynamic Inactivation of Bacteria with Porphyrin Derivatives: Effect of Charge, Lipophilicity, ROS Generation, and Cellular Uptake on Their Biological Activity In Vitro.

Authors:  Adam Sułek; Barbara Pucelik; Marcin Kobielusz; Agata Barzowska; Janusz M Dąbrowski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 5.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.