Literature DB >> 30453262

The human health risk estimation of inhaled oil spill emissions with and without adding dispersant.

Nima Afshar-Mohajer1, Mary A Fox2, Kirsten Koehler3.   

Abstract

Airborne toxic compounds emitted from polluted seawater polluted after an oil spill raise health concerns when inhaled by humans or other species. Inhalation of these toxic compounds as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or airborne fine particulate matter (PM) may cause serious pulmonary diseases, including lung cancer. Spraying chemical dispersants to enhance distribution of the crude oil into the water was employed extensively during the Deepwater Horizon spill. There is some evidence that dispersion of the crude oil decreased the emission rate of the VOCs but increased the emission rates of fine PM that may carry toxic compounds. In this study, the cancer risks and non-cancer hazards of the detected VOCs and particulates for spill-response workers were estimated with and without use of dispersant under action of breaking waves. A subchronic exposure scenario was modeled to address the inhalation health threat during initial phases of an oil spill response. A dosimetry model was used to estimate regional deposition of PM. Use of dispersant reduced benzene cancer risks from 57 to 37 excess lifetime cancer cases per million for 1 h of daily exposure that continues for 3 months. Adding dispersant resulted in emissions reductions of the lighter VOCs (up to 30% lower). However, hazard quotients (HQs) of the non-carcinogenic VOCs even after dispersant addition were above 1 meaning there are serious concerns about exposure to these VOCs. Inhalation of airborne particles emitted from the slick containing dispersant increased the total mass of deposited particles in upper respiratory regions compared to the slick of crude oil only. This study showed the application of dispersant onto the pollution slick increased the total mass burden to the human respiratory system about 10 times, an exploratory HQ analysis is presented to evaluate the potential health risk.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COREXIT 9500A; Cancer; Crude oil; Dosimetry; Health risk assessment; Occupational health

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30453262     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Self-reported oil spill exposure and birth outcomes among southern Louisiana women at the time of the Gulf oil spill: The GROWH study.

Authors:  Emily W Harville; Arti Shankar; Pierre Buekens; Jeffrey K Wickliffe; Maureen Y Lichtveld
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 7.401

Review 2.  Concentrations of TENORMs in the petroleum industry and their environmental and health effects.

Authors:  Mohsen M M Ali; Hongtao Zhao; Zhongyu Li; Najeeb N M Maglas
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 3.  Oil Spills and Human Health: Contributions of the Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative.

Authors:  Ruth L Eklund; Landon C Knapp; Paul A Sandifer; Rita C Colwell
Journal:  Geohealth       Date:  2019-12-11

4.  Health risk assessment of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in a refinery in the southwest of Iran using SQRA method.

Authors:  Ladan Khajeh Hoseini; Reza Jalilzadeh Yengejeh; Maryam Mohammadi Rouzbehani; Sima Sabzalipour
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-09

5.  Incidence of chronic respiratory conditions among oil spill responders: Five years of follow-up in the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Coast Guard Cohort study.

Authors:  Jennifer A Rusiecki; Hristina Denic-Roberts; Dana L Thomas; Jacob Collen; John Barrett; Kate Christenbury; Lawrence S Engel
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 6.498

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.