Jennifer A Rusiecki1, Hristina Denic-Roberts2, Dana L Thomas3, Jacob Collen4, John Barrett5, Kate Christenbury6, Lawrence S Engel7. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: jennifer.rusiecki@usuhs.edu. 2. Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, MD, USA. 3. United States Coast Guard Headquarters, Directorate of Health, Safety, and Work Life, Washington, D.C., USA. 4. Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. 5. Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. 6. Social & Scientific Systems, a DLH Corporation Holding Company, Durham, NC, USA. 7. Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Over ten years after the Deepwater Horizon (DWH) oil spill, our understanding of long term respiratory health risks associated with oil spill response exposures is limited. We conducted a prospective analysis in a cohort of U.S. Coast Guard personnel with universal military healthcare. METHODS: For all active duty cohort members (N = 45,193) in the DWH Oil Spill Coast Guard Cohort Study we obtained medical encounter data from October 01, 2007 to September 30, 2015 (i.e., ~2.5 years pre-spill; ~5.5 years post-spill). We used Cox Proportional Hazards regressions to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (aHR), comparing risks for incident respiratory conditions/symptoms (2010-2015) for: responders vs. non-responders; responders reporting crude oil exposure, any inhalation of crude oil vapors, and being in the vicinity of burning crude oil versus responders without those exposures. We also evaluated self-reported crude oil and oil dispersant exposures, combined. Within-responder comparisons were adjusted for age, sex, and smoking. RESULTS: While elevated aHRs for responder/non-responder comparisons were generally weak, within-responder comparisons showed stronger risks with exposure to crude oil. Notably, for responders reporting exposure to crude oil via inhalation, there were elevated risks for allsinusitis (aHR = 1.48; 95%CI, 1.06-2.06), unspecified chronic sinusitis (aHR = 1.55; 95%CI, 1.08-2.22), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and other allied conditions (aHR = 1.43; 95%CI, 1.00-2.06), and dyspnea and respiratory abnormalities (aHR = 1.29; 95%CI, 1.00-1.67); there was a suggestion of elevated risk for diseases classified as asthma and reactive airway diseases (aHR = 1.18; 95%CI, 0.98-1.41), including the specific condition, asthma (aHR = 1.35; 95%CI, 0.80-2.27), the symptom, shortness of breath (aHR = 1.50; 95%CI, 0.89-2.54), and the overall classification of chronic respiratory conditions (aHR = 1.18; 95%CI, 0.98-1.43). Exposure to both crude oil and dispersant was positively associated with elevated risk for shortness of breath (HR = 2.24; 95%CI, 1.09-4.64). CONCLUSIONS: Among active duty Coast Guard personnel, oil spill clean-up exposures were associated with moderately increased risk for longer term respiratory conditions.
BACKGROUND: Over ten years after the Deepwater Horizon (DWH) oil spill, our understanding of long term respiratory health risks associated with oil spill response exposures is limited. We conducted a prospective analysis in a cohort of U.S. Coast Guard personnel with universal military healthcare. METHODS: For all active duty cohort members (N = 45,193) in the DWH Oil Spill Coast Guard Cohort Study we obtained medical encounter data from October 01, 2007 to September 30, 2015 (i.e., ~2.5 years pre-spill; ~5.5 years post-spill). We used Cox Proportional Hazards regressions to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (aHR), comparing risks for incident respiratory conditions/symptoms (2010-2015) for: responders vs. non-responders; responders reporting crude oil exposure, any inhalation of crude oil vapors, and being in the vicinity of burning crude oil versus responders without those exposures. We also evaluated self-reported crude oil and oil dispersant exposures, combined. Within-responder comparisons were adjusted for age, sex, and smoking. RESULTS: While elevated aHRs for responder/non-responder comparisons were generally weak, within-responder comparisons showed stronger risks with exposure to crude oil. Notably, for responders reporting exposure to crude oil via inhalation, there were elevated risks for allsinusitis (aHR = 1.48; 95%CI, 1.06-2.06), unspecified chronic sinusitis (aHR = 1.55; 95%CI, 1.08-2.22), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and other allied conditions (aHR = 1.43; 95%CI, 1.00-2.06), and dyspnea and respiratory abnormalities (aHR = 1.29; 95%CI, 1.00-1.67); there was a suggestion of elevated risk for diseases classified as asthma and reactive airway diseases (aHR = 1.18; 95%CI, 0.98-1.41), including the specific condition, asthma (aHR = 1.35; 95%CI, 0.80-2.27), the symptom, shortness of breath (aHR = 1.50; 95%CI, 0.89-2.54), and the overall classification of chronic respiratory conditions (aHR = 1.18; 95%CI, 0.98-1.43). Exposure to both crude oil and dispersant was positively associated with elevated risk for shortness of breath (HR = 2.24; 95%CI, 1.09-4.64). CONCLUSIONS: Among active duty Coast Guard personnel, oil spill clean-up exposures were associated with moderately increased risk for longer term respiratory conditions.
Authors: Sultan Ayoub Meo; Abdul Majeed Al-Drees; Shahzad Rasheed; Imran Mu Meo; Muhammad Mujahid Khan; Muslim M Al-Saadi; Jasem Ramadan Alkandari Journal: Int J Occup Med Environ Health Date: 2009 Impact factor: 1.843
Authors: Michael J Morris; Robert J Walter; Edward T McCann; John H Sherner; Christina G Murillo; Brian S Barber; John C Hunninghake; Aaron B Holley Journal: Chest Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Jan-Paul Zock; Gema Rodríguez-Trigo; Francisco Pozo-Rodríguez; Joan A Barberà; Laura Bouso; Yolanda Torralba; Josep M Antó; Federico P Gómez; Carme Fuster; Héctor Verea Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2007-06-07 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Kaitlyn B Gam; Richard K Kwok; Lawrence S Engel; Matthew D Curry; Patricia A Stewart; Mark R Stenzel; John A McGrath; W Braxton Jackson; Robert L Jensen; Alexander P Keil; Maureen Y Lichtveld; Aubrey K Miller; Dale P Sandler Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Óscar Amor-Carro; Kathryn M White; Rebeca Fraga-Iriso; Luis A Mariñas-Pardo; Laura Núñez-Naveira; Beatriz Lema-Costa; Marta Villarnovo; Héctor Verea-Hernando; David Ramos-Barbón Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2020-02-12 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Gulnara Batyrova; Zhenisgul Tlegenova; Victoria Kononets; Gulmira Umarova; Khatimya Kudabayeva; Yerlan Bazargaliyev; Ainur Amanzholkyzy; Yeskendir Umarov Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-06 Impact factor: 4.614