| Literature DB >> 30449280 |
Marco V José1, Juan R Bobadilla2, Norma Y Sánchez-Torres2, Juan Pedro Laclette3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Taenia solium is the aetiological agent of human taeniasis, pig cysticercosis and human neurocysticercosis, which are serious public health problems, especially in developing countries.Entities:
Keywords: Chemotherapeutic interventions; Mathematical model; Prevention and control; Susceptible-infected model; Taenia-cysticercosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30449280 PMCID: PMC6241031 DOI: 10.1186/s12976-018-0090-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theor Biol Med Model ISSN: 1742-4682 Impact factor: 2.432
Fig. 1Transmission dynamics of taenia-cysticercosis. Basic flowchart of the life cycle of the tapeworm Taenia solium
Fig. 2Relationship between the prevalence of infection (P), and the degree of worm aggregation (k) when the mean intensity (M) is equal to one in all individuals
Parameters of the Mathematical Model Of Taenia/Cysticercosis
| Parameter | Symbol | Estimate | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inverse measure of aggregation of |
| 0.02–0.2 | This work |
| Inverse measure of aggregation of cysticerci |
| 0.23–0.37 | [ |
| Rate of transmission of adult parasites |
| 0.1–0.36 | This work |
| Rate of transmission of larvae to pigs |
| 0.35–1 | This work |
| Rate of transmission of larvae to humans |
| 0.036–0.1 | This work |
| See text for definition |
| 0.9–1 | |
| See text for definition |
| 0.6–0.9 | |
| See text for definition |
| 0.9–1 | |
| See text for definition |
| 0.16–0.33 | [ |
| See text for definition |
| 0.208 | [ |
| See text for definition |
| 0.3–0.67 | |
| Density of humans with T. solium ( | 0.001–0.01 | [ | |
| Density of hosts with cysticerci (pigs) |
| 0.1–0.6 | [ |
| Rate of mortality of the definitive host |
| 0.016 | |
| Rate of mortality of the intermediate host |
| 0.8–1.5 | |
| Severity of density-dependent constraints (taenia) |
| 0.001–0.01 | This work |
| Severity of density-dependent constraints (pigs) |
| 0.01–0.6 | This work |
| Severity of density-dependent constraints (humans) |
| 0.001–0.1 | This work |
| Rate of fecundity |
| 1 × 106-1 × 107 | [ |
| Rate of mortality of the adult parasite |
| 0.33–1 | [ |
| Rate of egg mortality |
| 50 | [ |
| Rate of larvae mortality (pigs) |
| 0.5–2 | [ |
| Rate of larvae mortality (humans) |
| 0.14–0.33 | [ |
Meaning of Variables and Parameters
| Symbol | Variables | UNITS |
|---|---|---|
|
| Mean intensity of taeniasis in humans | |
|
| Mean intensity of cysticerci in the pigs | |
|
| Mean intensity of cysticerci in humans | |
|
| Prevalence of adult parasites (taenias) | |
|
| Prevalence of larval parasites (cysticerci in pigs) | |
|
| Prevalence of larval parasites (cysticerci in humans) | |
|
| Number of tapeworm eggs | |
| PARAMETERS | ||
|
| Inverse measure of aggregation of T. solium | |
|
| Inverse measure of aggregation of cysticerci | |
|
| Rate of transmission of adult parasites | |
|
| Rate of transmission of larvae to pigs | |
|
| Rate of transmission of larvae to humans | |
|
| Proportion of parasites acquired by the definitive host which survive to reach sexual maturity | |
|
| Proportion of parasites acquired by the intermediate host which survive to reach infectivity | |
|
| Proportion of parasites accidentally acquired by human host which survive to reach infectivity | |
|
| Time period from entry into the definitive host to reproductive maturity when worms begin egg production | year |
|
| Time period from entry into the intermediate host (pig) to the development of the infective stage | Year |
|
| Time period from entry into the human host to the development of the infective stage | year |
|
| Density of humans that can be infected with T. solium | |
|
| Density of pigs that can be infected with cysticerci | |
|
| Density of humans that can be infected with cysticerci | |
|
| Rate of mortality of the definitive host (humans) | year−1 |
|
| Rate of mortality of the intermediate host (pigs) | year−1 |
|
| Severity of density-dependent constraints (taenia) | year−1 |
|
| Severity of density-dependent constraints (pigs) | year−1 |
|
| Severity of density-dependent constraints (humans) | year−1 |
|
| Rate of fecundity | year−1 |
|
| Rate of mortality of the adult parasite | year−1 |
|
| Rate of egg mortality | year−1 |
|
| Rate of larvae mortality (pigs) | year−1 |
|
| Rate of larvae mortality (humans) | year−1 |
Fig. 3Bifurcation diagrams of the transmission coefficients (β1, β2, β3) and the severities of the density-dependent constraints (α1, α2, α3), as a function of their respective mean intensities (M1, M2, M3). The range of time is from 0 to 20 years with steps of 0.1. The values of the parameters are:β1 = 0.32 (except in A); β2 = 0.44 (except in B); β3 = 0.05 (except in C); D1 = 0.96; D2 = 0.79; D3 = 0.96; H1 = 0.001; H2 = 0.6; b1 = 0.016; b2 = 0.9; α1 = 0 : 001(except in D); α2 = 0.38 (except in E); α3 = 0.08 (except in F); μ1 = 1; μ2 = 50; μ3 = 1; μ4 = 0.33; k1 = 0.02; k2 = 0.3; λ = 1 × 107; c2 = 0; p2 = 0; N1(0) = 1000; N2(0) = 1000. The value of Ro is 5.49. In all figures the solid lines denote the parabolic boundaries of the trajectories (see text for explanation). For each diagram, the breakpoints (M), are marked as red dot. In D and F, there are multiple equilibria (marked in orange) until they reach a breakpoint. In D not all critical points are marked
Fig. 4Computer simulated curves of the age-mean intensity of: a human taeniasis (blue-solid), pig cysticercosis (black-dotted), and human cysticercosis (red-dashed) based upon Eqs. (4a), (4b), and (4c), respectively; b Phase spaces of the dynamics of: M2 versus M3 (solid), M1 versus M3 (dotted), and M1 versus M2 (dash-dotted). The values of the parameters are: β1 = 0.32; β2 = 0.44; β3 = 0.05; D1 = 0.96; D2 = 0.79; D3 = 0.96; H1 = 0.001; H2 = 0.6; b1 = 0.016; b2 = 0.9; α1 = 0.001; α2 = 0.38; α3 = 0.08; μ1 = 1; μ2 = 50; μ3 = 1; μ4 = 0.33; k1 = 0.02; k2 = 0.3; λ = 1 × 107; N1(0) = 1000; N2(0) = 1000. The value of Ro is 5.49
Fig. 5Chemotherapeutic interventions against pig cysticercosis: a from 1.2 to 2.4 months of age (first double arrow), no intervention during 1 month, intervention again but to pigs from 3.6 to 4.8 months (second double arrow), no intervention during 2 months, and intervention to pigs from 7.2 to 8.4 months of age (third double arrow), consecutively; b The treatment schedule is the same as that shown in (a), but after no intervention from 8.4 to 10.8 months, there is an additional treatment to pigs of 10.8 to 12 months of age (fourth double arrow). The values of the parameters are the same as those used in Fig. 4, and G2 = 0.99; C2 = 0.99.
Fig. 6Chemotherapeutic intervention against human taeniasis (blue-solid); pig cysticercosis (black-dotted); human cysticercosis (red-dashed). a Mean worm intensities (b) Age-susceptibles (c) Age-prevalence (d) Phase spaces of the dynamics: M3 versus M2 (red-dashed), M3 versus M1 (blue-dotted), and M2 versus M1 (black-solid). The values of the parameters are: β1 = 0.32; β2 = 0.44; β3 = 0.05; D1 = 0.96; D2 = 0.79; D3 = 0.96; H1 = 0.001; H2 = 0.6; H3 = 0.001; b1 = 0.016; b2 = 0.9; α1 = 0.001; α2 = 0.38; α3 = 0.08; μ1 = 1; μ2 = 50; μ3 = 1; μ4 = 0.33; k1 = 0.02; k2 = 0.3; λ = 1 × 107; G1 = 0.9; C1 = 0.9; N1(0) = 1000; N2(0) = 1000. The value of Ro is 5.49