Literature DB >> 30449234

AR101 Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy.

Brian P Vickery, Andrea Vereda, Thomas B Casale, Kirsten Beyer, George du Toit, Jonathan O Hourihane, Stacie M Jones, Wayne G Shreffler, Annette Marcantonio, Rezi Zawadzki, Lawrence Sher, Warner W Carr, Stanley Fineman, Leon Greos, Rima Rachid, M Dolores Ibáñez, Stephen Tilles, Amal H Assa’ad, Caroline Nilsson, Ned Rupp, Michael J Welch, Gordon Sussman, Sharon Chinthrajah, Katharina Blumchen, Ellen Sher, Jonathan M Spergel, Frederick E Leickly, Stefan Zielen, Julie Wang, Georgiana M Sanders, Robert A Wood, Amarjit Cheema, Carsten Bindslev-Jensen, Stephanie Leonard, Rita Kachru, Douglas T Johnston, Frank C Hampel, Edwin H Kim, Aikaterini Anagnostou, Jacqueline A Pongracic, Moshe Ben-Shoshan, Hemant P Sharma, Allan Stillerman, Hugh H Windom, William H Yang, Antonella Muraro, José M Zubeldia, Vibha Sharma, Morna J Dorsey, Hey J Chong, Jason Ohayon, J Andrew Bird, Tara F Carr, Dareen Siri, Montserrat Fernández-Rivas, David K Jeong, David M Fleischer, Jay A Lieberman, Anthony E J Dubois, Marina Tsoumani, Christina E Ciaccio, Jay M Portnoy, Lyndon E Mansfield, Stephen B Fritz, Bruce J Lanser, Jonathan Matz, Hanneke N G Oude Elberink, Pooja Varshney, Stephen G Dilly, Daniel C Adelman, A Wesley Burks.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peanut allergy, for which there are no approved treatment options, affects patients who are at risk for unpredictable and occasionally life-threatening allergic reactions.
METHODS: In a phase 3 trial, we screened participants 4 to 55 years of age with peanut allergy for allergic dose-limiting symptoms at a challenge dose of 100 mg or less of peanut protein (approximately one third of a peanut kernel) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge. Participants with an allergic response were randomly assigned, in a 3:1 ratio, to receive AR101 (a peanut-derived investigational biologic oral immunotherapy drug) or placebo in an escalating-dose program. Participants who completed the regimen (i.e., received 300 mg per day of the maintenance regimen for approximately 24 weeks) underwent a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge at trial exit. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of participants 4 to 17 years of age who could ingest a challenge dose of 600 mg or more, without dose-limiting symptoms.
RESULTS: Of the 551 participants who received AR101 or placebo, 496 were 4 to 17 years of age; of these, 250 of 372 participants (67.2%) who received active treatment, as compared with 5 of 124 participants (4.0%) who received placebo, were able to ingest a dose of 600 mg or more of peanut protein, without dose-limiting symptoms, at the exit food challenge (difference, 63.2 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 53.0 to 73.3; P<0.001). During the exit food challenge, the maximum severity of symptoms was moderate in 25% of the participants in the active-drug group and 59% of those in the placebo group and severe in 5% and 11%, respectively. Adverse events during the intervention period affected more than 95% of the participants 4 to 17 years of age. A total of 34.7% of the participants in the active-drug group had mild events, as compared with 50.0% of those in the placebo group; 59.7% and 44.4% of the participants, respectively, had events that were graded as moderate, and 4.3% and 0.8%, respectively, had events that were graded as severe. Efficacy was not shown in the participants 18 years of age or older.
CONCLUSIONS: In this phase 3 trial of oral immunotherapy in children and adolescents who were highly allergic to peanut, treatment with AR101 resulted in higher doses of peanut protein that could be ingested without dose-limiting symptoms and in lower symptom severity during peanut exposure at the exit food challenge than placebo. (Funded by Aimmune Therapeutics; PALISADE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02635776 .).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30449234     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  105 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of Immune Responses in Food Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Johanna M Smeekens; Michael D Kulis
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 2.  How to Incorporate Oral Immunotherapy into Your Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Elissa M Abrams; Stephanie C Erdle; Scott B Cameron; Lianne Soller; Edmond S Chan
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 3.  Food Allergy from Infancy Through Adulthood.

Authors:  Scott H Sicherer; Christopher M Warren; Christopher Dant; Ruchi S Gupta; Kari C Nadeau
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2020-06

4.  Weighing the benefits and risks of oral immunotherapy in clinical practice.

Authors:  Aikaterini Anagnostou
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Proc       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.587

5.  Sustained successful peanut oral immunotherapy associated with low basophil activation and peanut-specific IgE.

Authors:  Mindy Tsai; Kaori Mukai; R Sharon Chinthrajah; Kari C Nadeau; Stephen J Galli
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 10.793

6.  Sublingual immunotherapy for food allergy and its future directions.

Authors:  Stephen A Schworer; Edwin H Kim
Journal:  Immunotherapy       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.196

Review 7.  Eosinophilic esophagitis during sublingual and oral allergen immunotherapy.

Authors:  Joseph Cafone; Peter Capucilli; David A Hill; Jonathan M Spergel
Journal:  Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2019-08

8.  Insights into how innocuous foods or proteins deserving of immune ignorance can become allergens.

Authors:  Larry Borish
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Changing Patient Mindsets about Non-Life-Threatening Symptoms During Oral Immunotherapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Lauren C Howe; Kari A Leibowitz; Margaret A Perry; Julie M Bitler; Whitney Block; Ted J Kaptchuk; Kari C Nadeau; Alia J Crum
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2019-01-23

10.  Long-term sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy in children: Clinical and immunologic evidence of desensitization.

Authors:  Edwin H Kim; Luanna Yang; Ping Ye; Rishu Guo; Quefeng Li; Michael D Kulis; A Wesley Burks
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 10.793

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.