Literature DB >> 12811263

A prospective, randomized, controlled cervical fusion study using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 with the CORNERSTONE-SR allograft ring and the ATLANTIS anterior cervical plate.

David S Baskin1, Patrick Ryan, Volker Sonntag, Richard Westmark, Marsha A Widmayer.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, pilot clinical trial compared recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) with iliac crest autograft bone for the treatment of human cervical disc disease.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the safety and effectiveness of using INFUSE Bone Graft (rhBMP-2 applied to an absorbable collagen sponge), as compared with an autogenous iliac crest bone graft placed inside the CORNERSTONE-SR fibular allograft, in anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 is an osteoinductive protein that induces a reliable fusion in the lumbar spine, but it has not been studied in patients with degenerative cervical disc disease.
METHODS: For this study, 33 patients with degenerative cervical disc disease were randomly assigned to investigational or control groups. The investigational group received a fibular allograft (CORNERSTONE-SR Allograft Ring) with an rhBMP-2-laden collagen carrier inside the graft along with an ATLANTIS anterior cervical plate. The control group received a fibular allograft with cancellous iliac crest autograft placed inside it, along with an ATLANTIS anterior cervical plate. The patients underwent plain radiographs at 6 weeks, then at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, and CT scans at 3 and 6 months after surgery. They also completed general health profiles and self-evaluation scales. Adverse events were evaluated for severity, duration, association with the implant, and the need for a second surgical procedure.
RESULTS: All the patients evaluated had solid fusions 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. There were no device-related adverse events. At 24 months, the investigational group had mean improvement superior to that of the control group in neck disability and arm pain scores (P < 0.03 each).
CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of using rhBMP-2 safely and effectively in the cervical spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12811263     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000065486.22141.CA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  65 in total

Review 1.  [Regenerative medicine and plastic surgery].

Authors:  H-G Machens; P Mailänder
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Targeting polymer therapeutics to bone.

Authors:  Stewart A Low; Jindřich Kopeček
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 15.470

3.  [Anterior cervical fusion in the lower cervical spine. Locked vs nonlocked screw plate, pure cancellous bone vs tricortical strut].

Authors:  L Sándor; P Barzo; A Kuncz; P Elek
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  An update on bone substitutes for spinal fusion.

Authors:  Masashi Miyazaki; Hiroshi Tsumura; Jeffrey C Wang; Ahmet Alanay
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Current status of bone graft options for anterior interbody fusion of the cervical and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Anthony Minh Tien Chau; Lileane Liang Xu; Johnny Ho-Yin Wong; Ralph Jasper Mobbs
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Geographic variation in the surgical treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease: American Board of Orthopedic Surgery Quality Improvement Initiative; part II candidates.

Authors:  Kevin J McGuire; John Harrast; Harry Herkowitz; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Complications, revision fusions, readmissions, and utilization over a 1-year period after bone morphogenetic protein use during primary cervical spine fusions.

Authors:  Adam P Goode; William J Richardson; Robin M Schectman; Timothy S Carey
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  mTOR inhibition and BMP signaling act synergistically to reduce muscle fibrosis and improve myofiber regeneration.

Authors:  Shailesh Agarwal; David Cholok; Shawn Loder; John Li; Christopher Breuler; Michael T Chung; Hsiao Hsin Sung; Kavitha Ranganathan; Joe Habbouche; James Drake; Joshua Peterson; Caitlin Priest; Shuli Li; Yuji Mishina; Benjamin Levi
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2016-12-08

9.  Bone morphogenetic protein in complex cervical spine surgery: A safe biologic adjunct?

Authors:  Darren R Lebl
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2013-04-18

10.  Diagnosing cervical fusion: a comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  Nanin Sethi; James Devney; Holly L Steiner; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2008-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.