Literature DB >> 30448863

Russeting partially restores apple skin permeability to water vapour.

Bishnu P Khanal1, Godfrey M Ikigu1, Moritz Knoche2.   

Abstract

MAIN
CONCLUSION: The higher water loss of russeted fruit results from the higher permeance of the periderm of the russeted skin as compared to that of the intact cuticle and epidermis. Apple fruit surfaces are often in-parallel composites, comprising areas of intact cuticle (atop a healthy epidermis) adjacent to areas covered by periderm (so-called russet). The occurrence of non-russeting and russeting genotypes makes this species an ideal model to study the barrier properties of its composite skin. The objective was to quantify the water vapour permeances of non-russeted ([Formula: see text]) and russeted fruit skins ([Formula: see text]). Rates of water loss from whole fruit ([Formula: see text]) and excised epidermal skin segments (ES) or peridermal skin segments (PS) were quantified gravimetrically. The [Formula: see text] was larger in russeting than in non-russeting genotypes because [Formula: see text] exceeded [Formula: see text] by about twofold. Also, the [Formula: see text] of russeting genotypes was larger than that of non-russeting genotypes. Generally, [Formula: see text] was more variable than [Formula: see text]. These differences were consistent across seasons and genotypes. The lower [Formula: see text] as compared to [Formula: see text] resulted primarily from the higher wax content of the cuticle of the [Formula: see text]. For non-russeted genotypes, the value of [Formula: see text] was significantly related to the permeance determined on the same intact fruit ([Formula: see text]). Close relationships were also found between the [Formula: see text] calculated from [Formula: see text] determined on the same fruit and the measured [Formula: see text]. For russeting genotypes, the [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text] were not correlated with [Formula: see text]. The [Formula: see text] calculated from [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] (all determined on an individual-fruit basis) was significantly correlated with the measured [Formula: see text]. Our results demonstrate that the periderm permeance exceeds the cuticle permeance and that permeances of non-russeted surfaces of russeting genotypes exceed those of non-russeting genotypes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cork; Cuticle; Microcrack; Periderm; Wax

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30448863     DOI: 10.1007/s00425-018-3044-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Planta        ISSN: 0032-0935            Impact factor:   4.116


  7 in total

1.  The Isolation of Plant Cuticle with Pectic Enzymes.

Authors:  W H Orgell
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1955-01       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Apple russeting as seen through the RNA-seq lens: strong alterations in the exocarp cell wall.

Authors:  Sylvain Legay; Gea Guerriero; Amélie Deleruelle; Marc Lateur; Danièle Evers; Christelle M André; Jean-Francois Hausman
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Studies on water transport through the sweet cherry fruit surface: characterizing conductance of the cuticular membrane using pericarp segments.

Authors:  M Knoche; S Peschel; M Hinz; M J Bukovac
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.116

4.  Water and oxygen permeance of phellems isolated from trees: the role of waxes and lenticels.

Authors:  Beate Groh; Carin Hübner; Klaus J Lendzian
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  Ultrastructural observations reveal the presence of channels between cork cells.

Authors:  Rita Teresa Teixeira; Helena Pereira
Journal:  Microsc Microanal       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 4.127

6.  Patterns of microcracking in apple fruit skin reflect those of the cuticular ridges and of the epidermal cell walls.

Authors:  Moritz Knoche; Bishnu P Khanal; Martin Brüggenwirth; Sarada Thapa
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 4.116

7.  The structure of the fruit peel in two varieties of Malus domestica Borkh. (Rosaceae) before and after storage.

Authors:  Agata Konarska
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.356

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Proteome and transcriptome profile analysis reveals regulatory and stress-responsive networks in the russet fruit skin of sand pear.

Authors:  Yuezhi Wang; Meisong Dai; Danying Cai; Zebin Shi
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 6.793

2.  Functional copy number variation of CsSHINE1 is associated with fruit skin netting intensity in cucumber, Cucumis sativus.

Authors:  Huijun Zhang; Yuhui Wang; Junyi Tan; Yiqun Weng
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Proteome and transcriptome profile analysis reveals regulatory and stress-responsive networks in the russet fruit skin of sand pear.

Authors:  Yuezhi Wang; Meisong Dai; Danying Cai; Zebin Shi
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 6.793

4.  Differential regulation of triterpene biosynthesis induced by an early failure in cuticle formation in apple.

Authors:  Luigi Falginella; Christelle M Andre; Sylvain Legay; Kui Lin-Wang; Andrew P Dare; Cecilia Deng; Ria Rebstock; Blue J Plunkett; Lindy Guo; Guido Cipriani; Richard V Espley
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 6.793

5.  Apple fruit periderms (russeting) induced by wounding or by moisture have the same histologies, chemistries and gene expressions.

Authors:  Yun-Hao Chen; Jannis Straube; Bishnu P Khanal; Viktoria Zeisler-Diehl; Kiran Suresh; Lukas Schreiber; Thomas Debener; Moritz Knoche
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.