Literature DB >> 30448044

Patient-led decision making: Measuring autonomy and respect in Canadian maternity care.

Saraswathi Vedam1, Kathrin Stoll2, Daphne N McRae3, Mo Korchinski4, Raquel Velasquez2, Jessie Wang2, Sarah Partridge2, Lorna McRae5, Ruth Elwood Martin4, Ganga Jolicoeur6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Changing Childbirth in British Columbia study explored women's preferences and experiences of maternity care, including women's role in decision-making.
METHODS: Following content validation by community members, we administered a cross-sectional online survey exploring novel topics, including drivers for interventions, and experiences of autonomy, respect, or mistreatment during maternity care. Using the Mothers Autonomy in Decision-Making (MADM) scale as an outcome measure in a mixed-effects analysis, we examined differential experiences by socio-demographic and prenatal risk profile, type of care provider, interventions received, and nature of communication with care providers.
RESULTS: A geographically representative sample of Canadian women (n = 2051) reported on 3400 pregnancies. Most women (95.2%) preferred to be the lead decision-maker during care. Patients of physicians had significantly lower autonomy (MADM) scores than midwifery clients as did women who felt pressured to accept interventions. Women who had a difference in opinion with their provider, and those who felt their provider seemed rushed reported the lowest MADM scores.
CONCLUSION: Women's autonomy is significantly altered by model of maternity care, the nature of interactions with care providers, and women's ability for self-determination. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: If health professionals acquire skills in person-centred decision-making experience of autonomy among pregnant women may improve.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autonomy; Childbirth; Decision-making; Participatory research; Patient-oriented; Person-centered; Pregnancy; Quality measure; Respectful maternity care

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30448044     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  14 in total

1.  A direct comparison of patient-reported outcomes and experiences in alternative models of maternity care in Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  Yvette D Miller; Jessica Tone; Sutapa Talukdar; Elizabeth Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Women's view on shared decision making and autonomy in childbirth: cohort study of Belgian women.

Authors:  Elke Deherder; Ilse Delbaere; Adriana Macedo; Marianne J Nieuwenhuijze; Sven Van Laere; Katrien Beeckman
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.105

3.  The Impact of Culturally-Centered Care on Peripartum Experiences of Autonomy and Respect in Community Birth Centers: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Rachel R Hardeman; Saraswathi Vedam; Jennifer I Almanza; J 'Mag Karbeah; Katelyn M Tessier; Carrie Neerland; Kathrin Stoll
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-11-24

4.  Women's experiences of planning a vaginal birth after caesarean in different models of maternity care in Australia.

Authors:  Hazel Keedle; Lilian Peters; Virginia Schmied; Elaine Burns; Warren Keedle; Hannah Grace Dahlen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  I felt so much conflict instead of joy: an analysis of open-ended comments from people in British Columbia who declined care recommendations during pregnancy and childbirth.

Authors:  Kathrin Stoll; Jessie J Wang; Paulomi Niles; Lindsay Wells; Saraswathi Vedam
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.223

6.  Maternity Care Preferences for Future Pregnancies Among United States Childbearers: The Impacts of COVID-19.

Authors:  Theresa E Gildner; Zaneta M Thayer
Journal:  Front Sociol       Date:  2021-02-18

7.  Pregnancy During the Global COVID-19 Pandemic: Canadian Experiences of Care.

Authors:  Sarah Rudrum
Journal:  Front Sociol       Date:  2021-02-04

8.  Investigating trends in those who experience menstrual bleeding changes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Authors:  Katharine M N Lee; Eleanor J Junkins; Chongliang Luo; Urooba A Fatima; Maria L Cox; Kathryn B H Clancy
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 14.957

9.  Inequities in quality perinatal care in the United States during pregnancy and birth after cesarean.

Authors:  Bridget Basile Ibrahim; Saraswathi Vedam; Jessica Illuzzi; Melissa Cheyney; Holly Powell Kennedy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.752

10.  Global stakeholder perspectives of home birth: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Ginny Brunton; Samira Wahab; Hassan Sheikh; Beth Murray Davis
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.