| Literature DB >> 30447697 |
Yoshihiro Miyagawa1,2, Takuya Mori1,2, Kei Goto1, Isao Kawahara1,2, Rina Fujiwara-Tani1, Shingo Kishi1, Takamitsu Sasaki1, Kiyomu Fujii1, Hitoshi Ohmori1, Hiroki Kuniyasu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oral intake of medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs) reportedly suppresses the accumulation of visceral fat and has antitumor effects in tumor-bearing animals. MCFAs penetrate the mitochondrial membrane in a carnitine shuttle-independent manner and are metabolized more quickly than long-chain fatty acids. Based on these characteristics, MCFAs may have pronounced effects in mitochondria-rich tissues, such as the myocardium. We examined the effect of oral intake of MCFAs on the heart.Entities:
Keywords: Cachexia; Cardiac dysfunction; Medium-chain fatty acids; Oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30447697 PMCID: PMC6240279 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-018-0908-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1LAA intake mouse model. a Experimental protocol. b Body weight changes. The data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. c-e Food, LAA, and calorie intake. The daily intake per mouse was calculated from the total intake of 3 mice in each group. Con: control; LAA: lauric acid
The body, QFM and EAA weight of mouse at euthanasia in each groups
| Control | 2%LAA | 5%LAA | 10%LAA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 26.2±1.1* | 26.2±1.1 | 21.8±1.0** | 17.1±1.1*** |
| QFM weight (g) | 0.20±0.03 | 0.22±0.01 | 0.18±0.01 | 0.14±0.02** |
| EFP weight (g) | 0.25±0.04 | 0.22±0.01 | 0.10±0.03*** | 0.03±0.01*** |
*Data are expressed an mean ± standard deviation
**p < 0.01, vs the control group
***p < 0.001, vs the control group. QFM quadriceps femoris muscle; EFP epididymal fat pad
Fig. 2Influence of LAA intake on the heart. a Cardiac weight. b Cardiomyocyte cell area. Histopathological specimens were observed under a microscope. The number of cells per unit area was measured. c Expression of Myl1 in the excised myocardial tissue. Myl1 expression after LAA intake is presented relative to the expression in the control, which was set as 100%. The data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. *p < 0.05, vs the control group; **p < 0.01, vs the control group; ***p < 0.001, vs the control group. Con: control; LAA: lauric acid; Myl1: myosin light chain
Fig. 3Heart morphology and expression of oxidative stress- and mitochondria-related proteins in cardiomyocytes. a and b Low- and high-power images of H&E staining in histological specimens, respectively. c-f Immunohistochemical staining for oxidative stress in nuclei (c) and cytoplasm (e) and graphs of the numbers of positive cells (d and f). Arrow indicates positive nucleus (c). g and h Immunohistochemical staining for mitochondria with a Letm1 antibody (g) and Letm1 expression quantified by western blotting (h). These data are expressed relative to the control, which was set as 100%. The data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. **p < 0.01, vs the control group; ***p < 0.001, vs the control group. H&E: hematoxylin and eosin; 8-OHdG: 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine; 4-HNE: 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal; Con: control; Letm1: leucine zipper-EF-hand containing transmembrane protein 1