M Valenstein1, H Walters2, P N Pfeiffer3, D Ganoczy2, M Miller4, M Fiorillo5, R M Bossarte6. 1. VA Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America; University of Michigan Department of Psychiatry, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America. Electronic address: marciav@med.umich.edu. 2. VA Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America. 3. VA Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America; University of Michigan Department of Psychiatry, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America. 4. Department of Health Sciences, Northeastern University Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Boston, MA, United States of America. 5. University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America. 6. Injury Control Research Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States of America; Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, United States of America.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Veterans in mental health care have high rates of firearm-related suicide; reducing firearm access during high-risk periods could save lives. We assessed veteran patients' attitudes towards voluntary interventions to reduce access. METHODS: Descriptive data came from surveys mailed to random samples of veterans receiving mental health care in five geographically diverse VA facilities. Survey items inquired about the acceptability of seven voluntary health system interventions to address firearm access, ranging from lower-intensity interventions that addressed safety but might not reduce access (i.e., clinician screening; distribution of gunlocks) to interventions substantially limiting access (i.e., storage of firearms offsite; gun disposal). Mailings occurred between 5/11/15 and 10/19/15; 677 of 1354 veterans (50%) returned the surveys. RESULTS: 93.2% of respondents endorsed one or more health system interventions addressing firearm access; 75.0% endorsed interventions substantially limiting access. Although veterans with household firearms were less likely to endorse interventions, fully 50.4% would personally participate in at least one intervention that substantially limited access. DISCUSSION: A majority of veterans in VA mental health care endorse voluntary health system interventions addressing firearm access during high-risk periods for suicide. Approximately half of veterans with firearms would personally participate in an intervention that substantially limited firearm access. Published by Elsevier Inc.
OBJECTIVE: Veterans in mental health care have high rates of firearm-related suicide; reducing firearm access during high-risk periods could save lives. We assessed veteran patients' attitudes towards voluntary interventions to reduce access. METHODS: Descriptive data came from surveys mailed to random samples of veterans receiving mental health care in five geographically diverse VA facilities. Survey items inquired about the acceptability of seven voluntary health system interventions to address firearm access, ranging from lower-intensity interventions that addressed safety but might not reduce access (i.e., clinician screening; distribution of gunlocks) to interventions substantially limiting access (i.e., storage of firearms offsite; gun disposal). Mailings occurred between 5/11/15 and 10/19/15; 677 of 1354 veterans (50%) returned the surveys. RESULTS: 93.2% of respondents endorsed one or more health system interventions addressing firearm access; 75.0% endorsed interventions substantially limiting access. Although veterans with household firearms were less likely to endorse interventions, fully 50.4% would personally participate in at least one intervention that substantially limited access. DISCUSSION: A majority of veterans in VA mental health care endorse voluntary health system interventions addressing firearm access during high-risk periods for suicide. Approximately half of veterans with firearms would personally participate in an intervention that substantially limited firearm access. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Julie E Richards; Sarah D Hohl; Courtney D Segal; David C Grossman; Amy K Lee; Ursula Whiteside; Casey Luce; Evette J Ludman; Greg Simon; Robert B Penfold; Emily C Williams Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Steven K Dobscha; Khaya D Clark; Summer Newell; Emily A Kenyon; Elizabeth Karras; Joseph A Simonetti; Martha Gerrity Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-01-26 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Jennifer M Boggs; LeeAnn M Quintana; Arne Beck; Samuel Clinch; Laura Richardson; Amy Conley; Julie E Richards; Marian E Betz Journal: Front Digit Health Date: 2022-09-06
Authors: Joseph A Simonetti; Brooke Dorsey Holliman; Ryan Holiday; Lisa A Brenner; Lindsey L Monteith Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-03-10 Impact factor: 3.240