Steven K Dobscha1,2, Khaya D Clark3, Summer Newell3, Emily A Kenyon3, Elizabeth Karras4, Joseph A Simonetti5,6, Martha Gerrity7,8. 1. VA Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA. Steven.Dobscha@va.gov. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. Steven.Dobscha@va.gov. 3. VA Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA. 4. VA Center of Excellence for Suicide Prevention, Canandaigua, NY, USA. 5. Rocky Mountain Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC) for Suicide Prevention, VHA, Aurora, CO, USA. 6. Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VHA, Aurora, CO, USA. 7. Division of General Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. 8. Section of General Medicine, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Two-thirds of veteran suicides are attributable to firearm injury. Although half of veterans who die by suicide are seen in primary care settings in the month prior to death, little is known about how to promote firearm safety within primary care. OBJECTIVE: Describe veterans' perspectives on discussing firearms storage safety (FSS) during primary care visits, and identify key strategies for primary care teams to use in discussing FSS with veterans at elevated risk for suicide. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of transcripts and notes from four veteran focus groups and from individual semi-structured interviews with six veterans. PARTICIPANTS: Altogether, 68 veterans participated. Three of the groups were associated with one Veterans Health Administration facility. Groups were diverse in age, service era, and gender. APPROACH: The goals of the focus groups and interviews were to assess acceptance of FSS discussions during primary care visits, identify facilitators and barriers to conducting FSS discussions, and identify strategies for primary care teams to use to effectively conduct FSS discussions. Transcripts and meeting notes were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. KEY RESULTS: There was general acceptance of having FSS discussions in primary care. Yet, most veterans did not support direct questioning about firearm ownership, which may trigger fears of having firearms taken away or limit access to firearms. Participants recommended primary care teams provide rationale for FSS discussions and be prepared to provide information on legal consequences of disclosing firearm ownership. Strategies suggested for primary care staff also included using a personalized, caring, and conversational approach rather than highly scripted or checklist approach, engaging veterans in a non-judgmental manner, and conveying respect for veterans' knowledge of firearms. CONCLUSIONS: Discussing FSS with veterans in primary care settings is a promising upstream approach that can complement other suicide prevention efforts, but must be conducted in a veteran-centric manner.
BACKGROUND: Two-thirds of veteran suicides are attributable to firearm injury. Although half of veterans who die by suicide are seen in primary care settings in the month prior to death, little is known about how to promote firearm safety within primary care. OBJECTIVE: Describe veterans' perspectives on discussing firearms storage safety (FSS) during primary care visits, and identify key strategies for primary care teams to use in discussing FSS with veterans at elevated risk for suicide. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of transcripts and notes from four veteran focus groups and from individual semi-structured interviews with six veterans. PARTICIPANTS: Altogether, 68 veterans participated. Three of the groups were associated with one Veterans Health Administration facility. Groups were diverse in age, service era, and gender. APPROACH: The goals of the focus groups and interviews were to assess acceptance of FSS discussions during primary care visits, identify facilitators and barriers to conducting FSS discussions, and identify strategies for primary care teams to use to effectively conduct FSS discussions. Transcripts and meeting notes were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. KEY RESULTS: There was general acceptance of having FSS discussions in primary care. Yet, most veterans did not support direct questioning about firearm ownership, which may trigger fears of having firearms taken away or limit access to firearms. Participants recommended primary care teams provide rationale for FSS discussions and be prepared to provide information on legal consequences of disclosing firearm ownership. Strategies suggested for primary care staff also included using a personalized, caring, and conversational approach rather than highly scripted or checklist approach, engaging veterans in a non-judgmental manner, and conveying respect for veterans' knowledge of firearms. CONCLUSIONS: Discussing FSS with veterans in primary care settings is a promising upstream approach that can complement other suicide prevention efforts, but must be conducted in a veteran-centric manner.
Authors: Steven K Dobscha; Lauren M Denneson; Anne E Kovas; Kathryn Corson; Drew A Helmer; Matthew J Bair Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2013-12-04 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Yeates Conwell; Paul R Duberstein; Kenneth Connor; Shirley Eberly; Christopher Cox; Eric D Caine Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2002 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Edmond D Shenassa; Michelle L Rogers; Kirsten L Spalding; Mary B Roberts Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Joseph A Simonetti; Brooke Dorsey Holliman; Ryan Holiday; Lisa A Brenner; Lindsey L Monteith Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-03-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Steven K Dobscha; Khaya D Clark; Elizabeth Karras; Joseph A Simonetti; Summer Newell; Emily A Kenyon; Victoria Elliott; Jennie Boster; Martha Gerrity Journal: J Med Educ Curric Dev Date: 2022-02-14