Vasco Branco1, Cristina Carvalho2. 1. Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto, Lisboa 1649-003, Portugal. Electronic address: vasco.branco@ff.ulisboa.pt. 2. Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto, Lisboa 1649-003, Portugal. Electronic address: cristina.carvalho@ff.ulisboa.pt.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mercury interaction with selenium in vivo has been recognized for >50 years. Several researchers attempted to use selenium to mitigate the detrimental effects of mercurial compounds but the results were controversial. Selenium pools in living organisms are quite low and the high affinity of mercury to bind selenols pointed out selenoproteins as possible targets of toxicity. Such was the case of the selenoenzyme thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) which is an integrant part of the thioredoxin system. Given the important role of this redox system for cellular functioning and the high affinity of mercury for TrxR's active site, this interaction can be key to understand the mechanism by which Hg causes cell death. SCOPE OF THE REVIEW: This review discusses the current state of knowledge concerning the interaction between mercury compounds and the thioredoxin system, its implications for the development of toxicity and the effects of selenium co-exposure. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS: The mechanism of toxicity of mercurials is a complex chain of events starting with inhibition of the selenoenzyme, TrxR. Selenium supplementation protects TrxR from the toxicity of inorganic forms of mercury (i.e., Hg(II)) to a certain extent, but not from methylmercury. When TrxR is inhibited, thioredoxin is reduced by alternative mechanisms involving glutathione and glutaredoxin and only when this pathway is hampered does cell death occur. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: Understanding the molecular mechanism of mercury toxicity and the mechanisms of enzymatic compensation allows the design of mitigation strategies and, since TxrR and Trx exist in the plasma, puts forward the possibility for future use of changes in activity/expression of these enzymes as biomarkers of mercury toxicity, thus refining the risk assessment process.
BACKGROUND:Mercury interaction with selenium in vivo has been recognized for >50 years. Several researchers attempted to use selenium to mitigate the detrimental effects of mercurial compounds but the results were controversial. Selenium pools in living organisms are quite low and the high affinity of mercury to bind selenols pointed out selenoproteins as possible targets of toxicity. Such was the case of the selenoenzyme thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) which is an integrant part of the thioredoxin system. Given the important role of this redox system for cellular functioning and the high affinity of mercury for TrxR's active site, this interaction can be key to understand the mechanism by which Hg causes cell death. SCOPE OF THE REVIEW: This review discusses the current state of knowledge concerning the interaction between mercury compounds and the thioredoxin system, its implications for the development of toxicity and the effects of selenium co-exposure. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS: The mechanism of toxicity of mercurials is a complex chain of events starting with inhibition of the selenoenzyme, TrxR. Selenium supplementation protects TrxR from the toxicity of inorganic forms of mercury (i.e., Hg(II)) to a certain extent, but not from methylmercury. When TrxR is inhibited, thioredoxin is reduced by alternative mechanisms involving glutathione and glutaredoxin and only when this pathway is hampered does cell death occur. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: Understanding the molecular mechanism of mercury toxicity and the mechanisms of enzymatic compensation allows the design of mitigation strategies and, since TxrR and Trx exist in the plasma, puts forward the possibility for future use of changes in activity/expression of these enzymes as biomarkers of mercury toxicity, thus refining the risk assessment process.
Authors: Olga P Ajsuvakova; Alexey A Tinkov; Michael Aschner; João B T Rocha; Bernhard Michalke; Margarita G Skalnaya; Anatoly V Skalny; Monica Butnariu; Maryam Dadar; Ioan Sarac; Jan Aaseth; Geir Bjørklund Journal: Coord Chem Rev Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 22.315
Authors: Michael Aschner; Alexey A Tinkov; Anatoly V Skalny; Airton C Martins; Anton I Sinitskii; Marcelo Farina; Rongzhu Lu; Fernando Barbosa; Yordanka G Gluhcheva; Abel Santamaria Journal: Arch Toxicol Date: 2022-06-21 Impact factor: 6.168
Authors: Cláudia S Oliveira; Ana L A Segatto; Pablo A Nogara; Bruna C Piccoli; Élgion L S Loreto; Michael Aschner; João B T Rocha Journal: Front Genet Date: 2020-05-05 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Paula Nobre; Maria de Fátima Cabral; Judite Costa; Margarida Castro-Caldas; Cristina Carvalho; Vasco Branco Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-30 Impact factor: 3.390