| Literature DB >> 34331176 |
Marinelle Espino1,2, Harkaitz Eguiraun3,4, Oihane Diaz de Cerio3,5, José Antonio Carrero6, Nestor Etxebarria3,6, Iciar Martinez7,8,9,10.
Abstract
Feeding 3.9 and 6.7 mg Hg/kg (Se/Hg molar ratios of 0.8 and 0.4, respectively) for 14 days negatively affected Dicentrarchus labrax growth and total DNTB- and thioredoxin-reductase (TrxR) activities and the transcription of four redox genes (txn1, gpx1, txnrd3, and txnrd2) in the liver, but a diet with 0.5 mg Hg/kg (Se/Hg molar ratio 6.6) slightly increased both reductase activities and the transcription of txn1, gpx1, and txnrd2. Feeding 6.7 mg Hg/kg for 53 days downregulated the genes of the thioredoxin system (txn1, txnrd3, and txnrd2) but upregulated gpx1, confirming the previously proposed complementarity among the antioxidant systems. Substitution of 20% of the feed by thawed white fish (hake) slightly counteracted the negative effects of Hg. The effects were not statistically significant and were dependent, in a non-linear manner, on the Se/Hg molar ratio of the feed but not on its Hg concentration. These results stress the need to consider the Se/Hg molar ratio of the feed/food when evaluating the toxicity of Hg.Entities:
Keywords: Dicentrarchus labrax; Fish; Glutathione peroxidase; Mercury (Hg); Seafood; Selenium (Se); Selenogene transcription; Thioredoxin reductase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34331176 PMCID: PMC9023391 DOI: 10.1007/s12011-021-02835-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Trace Elem Res ISSN: 0163-4984 Impact factor: 4.081
Weight (g) of the fish at the beginning and at the end of the experiment, which was 14 days for groups A1–A4 and 53 days for B1–B3. Statistical differences were calculated using the Student’s t-test. Se/Hg, Se/Hg molar ratio in the feeds; %IW, % increased weight of the group; CF calculated Fulton’s condition factor (CF = (W/L3) × 100) for the fish at the end of the experimental phases. SGR, estimated specific growth gate (SGR = 100[(log final body weight − log initial body weight)/days]
| Group | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | 29.5 | 7 | 141.6 ± 19.2 | 185.5 ± 40.4*,a | 23.51 | 1.28 ± 0.12 | 0.79 ± 0.31a |
| A2 | 6.6 | 7 | 138.6 ± 34.9 | 180.2 ± 10.8*,a | 23.10 | 1.36 ± 0.08 | 0.89 ± 0.61a,c |
| A3 | 0.8 | 7 | 141.6 ± 18.2 | 144.2 ± 24.4b | 1.85 | 1.26 ± 0.15 | 0.03 ± 0.34b |
| A4 | 0.4 | 7 | 144.0 ± 22.5 | 162.9 ± 32.1*,a,b | 11.59 | 1.32 ± 0.08 | 0.40 ± 0.28b,c |
| B1 | 29.5 | 17 | 177 .1 ± 37.6 | 218.4 ± 49.4* | 22.98 | 1.32 ± 0.07 | 0.17 ± 0.03 |
| B2 | 0.4 | 17 | 180 .9 ± 30.1 | 226.0 ± 46.1* | 24.88 | 1.33 ± 0.11 | 0.18 ± 0.05 |
| B3 | 0.4 | 17 | 174 .7 ± 35.4 | 214.4 ± 39.3* | 20.32 | 1.30 ± 0.07 | 0.15 ± 0.04 |
*The fish were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) heavier at the end than at the beginning of the experiments
a,b,cDifferent superscripts in the column indicate significant differences
Primer design and SYBR Green qPCR parameters used to amplify target genes. The table indicates the ID of the sequences where the primers were designed; forward and reverse primer sequences (5′-3′sense); amplified amplicon size (bp); qPCR primer melting temperature (ºC); used primer concentration (µM); used cDNA dilution from the synthetized 2 µg in 20 µL; and the qPCR efficiency of each amplification reaction (%)
| Primer sequence (5′-3′) | Amplicon (bp) | Tm (°C) | Primer conc (µM) | cDNA dilutions | E (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FN566754 | Fw: CTGGTGGTGGTGGACTTCA Rv:CTCACATCCTCAGCCTCATCT | ||||||
| 140 | 58 | 6.25 | 1/400 | 91.78 | |||
| DT044993.1 | Fw: GCCCACCCTTTGTTTGTC Rv: GCACACTTTACTTGACCCTCTTG | ||||||
| 238 | 55 | 6.25 | 1/400 | 86.75 | |||
| GFJW01016941.1 | Fw: TCTGTGTTATGGGCAGTTGG Rv: CCCGTCTCCTTGTTGAGTTG | ||||||
| 247 | 55 | 3.125 | 1/5 | 132.78 | |||
| GFJX01019781.1 | Fw: CTCCGCAAATATGTCCCAGT Rv: GCACATTGGTCTGCTCTTCA | ||||||
| 86 | 57 | 6.25 | 1/5 | 120.71 | |||
Pearson’s correlation coefficients among all the variables measured in Phase A and Phase B, as indicated. Hg feed and Hg fillet are the concentrations in mg Hg/kg feed and fillet, respectively; Se/Hg is the Se/Hg molar ratio; W is the weight of the fish (g); CF is the Foulton’s condition factor; DNTB is the total DNTB-reductase activity; TrxR is the TrxR activity; and txn1, gpx, txnrd3, and txnrd2 are the transcription levels of the corresponding redox genes normalized with respect to the levels of A1 in Phase A and to the levels of B1 in Phase B. Cells in blue indicate positive correlations and in orange negative correlations. There were no significant differences among the parameters within each phase
Fig. 1Boxplot of the effect of different Hg concentrations on the total DNTB-reductase (upper plot) and TrxR (lower plot) activities in the liver of D. labrax exposed for a and b 14 days (Phase A, in green) and c and d 53 days (Phase B, in gray). The groups received the following Se/Hg molar ratios in their feeds: A1 and B1, 29.5; A2, 6.6; A3, 0.82; and A4, B2, and B3, 0.4, as indicated in the graphs. Groups B1 and B2 received 20% TH in their diet. The results are plotted as percentage activity (as change in OD412/min/mg protein) of the median of the controls A1 and B1 for Phases A and B, respectively, n = 4. The red line represents the average normalized value of the control groups
Results of the ICP-MS analyses and Se/Hg molar ratios in the samples. Average (Avg) ± standard deviation (std) values of the trace element concentrations in mg of element/kg dry matter
| Sample | mg Hg/kg dry matter | mg Se/kg dry matter | Se/Hg molar ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feed of A1 | 2 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 1.17 ± 0.15 | 29.51 ± 3.09 |
| Feed of A2 | 2 | 0.47 ± 0.03 | 1.22 ± 0.16 | 6.56 ± 0.49 |
| Feed of A3 | 2 | 3.91 ± 0.22 | 1.26 ± 0.03 | 0.82 ± 0.02 |
| Feed of A4 | 2 | 6.66 ± 1.06 | 1.08 ± 0.30 | 0.41 ± 0.05 |
| B1, muscle | 5 | 0.38 ± 0.01 | 1.04 ± 0.02 | 7.08 ± 0.36 |
| B2, muscle | 5 | 5.83 ± 1.32 | 0.87 ± 0.12 | 0.39 ± 0.11 |
| B3, muscle | 5 | 6.29 ± 0.54 | 0.91 ± 0.08 | 0.37 ± 0.04 |
| Hake, muscle | 4 | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 1.30 ± 0.10 | 12.17 ± 0.56 |
Fig. 2Boxplot of the effect of different Hg concentrations on the transcription levels of redox genes txn1 (upper left); gpx1 (upper right); txnrd3 (lower left); and txnrd2 (lower right) in the liver of D. labrax. Plots a, b, c, and d in green correspond to Phase A; plots e, f, g, and h in gray correspond to Phase B. The control for Phase A was A1, and the control for Phase B was B1. The groups received the following Se/Hg molar ratios in their feeds: A1 and B1, 29.5; A2, 6.6; A3, 0.82; and A4, B2, and B3, 0.4, as indicated in the graphs. Groups B1 and B2 received 20% TH in their diet. The results are plotted as fold change with respect to the median transcription values of the controls, n = 4. The red line represents the average normalized value of the control groups