Literature DB >> 30447040

Intravenous contrast-free standardized exercise perfusion imaging in diabetic feet with ulcers.

Masoud Edalati1, Mary K Hastings2, David Muccigrosso1, Christopher J Sorensen2, Charles Hildebolt1, Mohamed A Zayed3, Michael J Mueller2, Jie Zheng1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Impaired foot perfusion is a primary contributor to foot ulcer formation. There is no existing device nor method that can be used to measure local foot perfusion during standardized foot muscle exercise in an MRI environment.
PURPOSE: To develop a new MRI-compatible foot dynamometer and MRI methods to characterize local perfusion in diabetic feet with ulcers. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION/
SUBJECTS: Seven participants without diabetes and 10 participants with diabetic foot ulcers. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0T, arterial spin labeling (ASL). ASSESSMENTS: Using a new MRI-compatible foot dynamometer, all participants underwent MRI ASL perfusion assessment at rest and during a standardized toe-flexion exercise. The participants without diabetes were scanned twice to assess the reproducibility of perfusion measurements. The absolute perfusion and perfusion reserve values were compared between two groups and between regions near ulcers (peri-ulcer) and away from ulcers (away-ulcer). STATISTICAL TESTS: Bland-Altman methods for the calculation of coefficient of repeatability (CR) and two-sided and unpaired Student's t-test to compare multiple differences.
RESULTS: The perfusion reserves measured had the best reproducibility (CR in medial region: 1.6, lateral region: 0.9). The foot perfusion reserve was significantly lower in the participants with diabetes compared with the participants without diabetes (1.34 ± 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1, 1.58 vs. 1.76 ± 0.31, 95% CI: 1.53, 1.98, P = 0.02). Both peri-ulcer exercise perfusion (8.7 ± 3.9 ml/min/100g) and perfusion reserve (1.07 ± 0.39, 95% CI: 0.78, 1.35) were significantly lower than away-ulcer exercise perfusion (12.7 ± 3.8 ml/min/100g, P = 0.02) and perfusion reserve (1.39 ± 0.37, 95% CI: 1.11, 1.66, P = 0.03), respectively. DATA
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates intravenous contrast-free methods for local perfusion in feet with ulcers by standardized exercise-based MRI. Ischemia regions around foot ulcers can be quantitatively distinguished from normal perfused muscle regions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:474-480.
© 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diabetes mellitus; exercise; foot ulcer; magnetic resonance imaging; perfusion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30447040      PMCID: PMC6933046          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  22 in total

Review 1.  Diabetic foot ulcers: etiology, treatment, and prevention.

Authors:  C Grunfeld
Journal:  Adv Intern Med       Date:  1992

2.  Accurate myocardial T1 measurements: toward quantification of myocardial blood flow with arterial spin labeling.

Authors:  Haosen Zhang; Steve M Shea; Vivian Park; Debiao Li; Pamela K Woodard; Robert J Gropler; Jie Zheng
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  Diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Michael E Edmonds; A V M Foster
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-18

4.  In vivo quantitative mapping of cardiac perfusion in rats using a noninvasive MR spin-labeling method.

Authors:  V Belle; E Kahler; C Waller; E Rommel; S Voll; K H Hiller; W R Bauer; A Haase
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  'Real angiosome' assessment from peripheral tissue perfusion using tissue oxygen saturation foot-mapping in patients with critical limb ischemia.

Authors:  Y Kagaya; N Ohura; H Suga; H Eto; A Takushima; K Harii
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 7.069

Review 6.  International consensus and practical guidelines on the management and the prevention of the diabetic foot. International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot.

Authors:  J Apelqvist; K Bakker; W H van Houtum; M H Nabuurs-Franssen; N C Schaper
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.876

7.  The relationship between the mechanical properties of heel-pad and common clinical measures associated with foot ulcers in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Panagiotis E Chatzistergos; Roozbeh Naemi; Lakshmi Sundar; Ambadi Ramachandran; Nachiappan Chockalingam
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 2.852

Review 8.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of tests to predict wound healing in diabetic foot.

Authors:  Zhen Wang; Rim Hasan; Belal Firwana; Tarig Elraiyah; Apostolos Tsapas; Larry Prokop; Joseph L Mills; Mohammad Hassan Murad
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 9.  Performance of prognostic markers in the prediction of wound healing or amputation among patients with foot ulcers in diabetes: a systematic review.

Authors:  J R W Brownrigg; R J Hinchliffe; J Apelqvist; E J Boyko; R Fitridge; J L Mills; J Reekers; C P Shearman; R E Zierler; N C Schaper
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.876

10.  Utility of Toe-brachial Index for Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease.

Authors:  Seong Chul Park; Chang Yong Choi; Young In Ha; Hyung Eun Yang
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2012-05-10
View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of microvascular permeability of skeletal muscle and texture analysis based on DCE-MRI in alloxan-induced diabetic rabbits.

Authors:  Baiyu Liu; Lei Hu; Li Wang; Dong Xing; Lin Peng; Pianpian Chen; Feifei Zeng; Weiyin Vivian Liu; Huan Liu; Yunfei Zha
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Relationships within and between lower and upper extremity dysfunction in people with diabetes.

Authors:  Mary K Hastings; Hyo-Jung Jeong; Christopher J Sorensen; Jennifer A Zellers; Ling Chen; Kathryn L Bohnert; Darrah Snozek; Michael J Mueller
Journal:  Foot (Edinb)       Date:  2020-03-30

3.  Low frequency oscillations assessed by diffuse speckle contrast analysis for foot angiosome concept.

Authors:  Chaebeom Yeo; Hanbeen Jung; Kijoon Lee; Cheol Song
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Deteriorated regional calf microcirculation measured by contrast-free MRI in patients with diabetes mellitus and relation with physical activity.

Authors:  Jie Zheng; Christopher Sorensen; Ran Li; Hongyu An; Charles F Hildebolt; Mohamed A Zayed; Michael J Mueller; Mary K Hastings
Journal:  Diab Vasc Dis Res       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.541

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.