| Literature DB >> 30446720 |
M G Gorman1,2, A L Coleman3, R Briggs3,4, R S McWilliams3, D McGonegle5, C A Bolme6, A E Gleason6,7, E Galtier8, H J Lee8, E Granados8, M Śliwa5, C Sanloup9, S Rothman10, D E Fratanduono4, R F Smith4, G W Collins11, J H Eggert4, J S Wark5, M I McMahon3.
Abstract
Bismuth has long been a prototypical system for investigating phase transformations and melting at high pressure. Despite decades of experimental study, however, the lattice-level response of Bi to rapid (shock) compression and the relationship between structures occurring dynamically and those observed during slow (static) compression, are still not clearly understood. We have determined the structural response of shock-compressed Bi to 68 GPa using femtosecond X-ray diffraction, thereby revealing the phase transition sequence and equation-of-state in unprecedented detail for the first time. We show that shocked-Bi exhibits a marked departure from equilibrium behavior - the incommensurate Bi-III phase is not observed, but rather a new metastable phase, and the Bi-V phase is formed at significantly lower pressures compared to static compression studies. We also directly measure structural changes in a shocked liquid for the first time. These observations reveal new behaviour in the solid and liquid phases of a shocked material and give important insights into the validity of comparing static and dynamic datasets.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30446720 PMCID: PMC6240068 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35260-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Experimental Setup and 2D diffraction data. (a) CSPAD detectors were arranged in a transmission Debye-Scherrer geometry in the MEC vacuum chamber. Dual drive beams were incident on target at angle of 15° and the XFEL beam probed the target at 30° from the target normal. The VISAR laser probed normal to the rear surface of the target. (b) 2D raw diffraction images from three different solid phases of Bi obtained on compression (profiles (i–iii)) and the liquid phase (profiles (iv,v)). The initial microstructure of the Bi starting material is retained as the Bi-I phase is compressed, but it drastically changed through the reconstructive phase transitions (profiles (ii,iii)). The strongest diffraction peaks from the high-pressure phase are indicated with arrows. Diffraction peaks from uncompressed Bi-I were observed in all diffraction profiles obtained before the shock reached the target rear surface.
Figure 2Solid phases + liquid phase (L) of Bi on shock compression. (a) Bi-I (profile (i)) transforms to Bi-II (profile (ii)) at 2.5 GPa (upper tick marks) with compressed Bi-I also being observed (lower tick marks). A transformation to a metastable phase (Bi-M, and whose peaks are marked with asterisks) is observed at 3 GPa (profile (iii)) and is always accompanied by diffraction peaks from bcc Bi-V, the locations of which are indicated by tick marks. Above 4 GPa only peaks from Bi-V are observed (profiles (iv,v)). (b) The first liquid scattering appears at 19 GPa (profile (ii)). The liquid phase-fraction grows with increasing pressure (profiles (iii,iv)) until only diffraction from the liquid phase is observed above 27 GPa (profile (v)). Peaks from uncompressed Bi-I, the locations of which are shown using triangles below profile (a)(i), are observed at all pressures.
Figure 3Local Structure of Liquid-Bi on Shock Compression (profiles spaced in intensity for clarity). (a) Integrated diffraction profiles from liquid-Bi from 28–68 GPa (profiles (ii–vi)), and also at 0 GPa and ~1500 K (profile (i)). (b) The corresponding S(Q) data. The prominent shoulder on the high-Q side of the first liquid peak at 0 GPa suggest that the local structure of liquid-Bi at this pressure deviates from that of a simple liquid. At higher pressures (profiles (ii–vi)) this shoulder is not observed, demonstrating that liquid-Bi is more simple and close-packed at these pressures. (c) The corresponding g(r) data. The form of g(r) changes as a shoulder on the left-hand side of the second coordination maximum becomes more prominent with increasing pressure, indicating liquid-Bi goes through a subtle and smooth transition with pressure. The full and dotted profiles in (b,c) show the S(q) and g(r) results obtained using sample densities determined using two different methods. The ambient pressure S(q) and g(r) from Greenberg et al. are shown by dashed line in (b)(i) and (c)(i) for comparison[23].
Figure 4Multiphase Hugoniot of Bi. Compressibility data obtained in the current study are plotted using grey shaded symbols, and their phase is identified with red type. The peak sample pressure was determined using the U as measured by VISAR and the volumetric compression was determined by diffraction (see pressure determination). The shaded lozenge in the inset indicates the region of P − V space to which our data constrain the metastable Bi-M phase. Data from Bi-V which were obtained from diffraction profiles containing diffraction peaks from both Bi-V and Bi-M are indicated with shaded inverted triangles. Previous shock compression data (including the data of Romain et al. (grey open circles)[11]) are shown by open symbols (triangles[15], inverted triangles ([36], squares ([8], diamonds[9], plus signs[37], crosses[38], and asterisks (reanalysed from[36]). The room temperature EoSs obtained from static-compression studies (labelled in the inset) are shown with solid black lines, and their extrapolation to ambient pressure with dashed lines. The EoS for Bi-II is taken from the computational study of Hausserman et al.[39]. The theoretical Hugoniot of Pelissier et al.[14] (solid grey line) shows excellent agreement with our data throughout the entire pressure range studied. For tabular data see Table S1.